my cover revised a lil bit

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Oct 10, 2002
2,670
31
0
47
skichdesigns.com
#2
Not bad..I see big potentials.Put a lighter border around the text on the bottom so it doesn't camoflauge with the background....White wouldn't hurt as a border..1..When you add the pic I think its gonna make for a sicc ass cover...1
 
Sep 16, 2002
4,118
37
0
41
www.2coldgraphiks.com
#12
I think the first cover looks better than this one. There is really nothin that jumps to my attention on this one. And for God's sake change the background pic. You don't want it to look like yo city aint nothin but a big ass parkin lot with a couple of houses.
 
Apr 25, 2002
885
2
0
www.essqubed.com
#13
Dr. Luni said:
so dont be jumpin to conclusions
Folks...I'm Bay Area born & raised for 28 years in this savagery...I know wussup in Richmond so don't think I need Turf Education 101. I know wussup in this whole m.f. That don't change the fact that the flick you used is not worthy of a cover. If someone DIDN'T know the Rich & they seen that pick...that's what they might think. Period. That's the facts, you don't have to like'em, you just gotta choose wether you want to use the comments to piss you off or to help make it tighter.

Regards