Muslims, chill...
- Thread starter I. Cold
- Start date
i meant to say its a natural thing for humans to "learn" from previous experiences, such as no food = hunger, kick in throat = pain
one can see kick in throat hurts, and he can also see hurting is worse than feeling normal, therefore one wont do it.
i know you guys understand what i say u just love to argue.
edj will continue to ask me questions until i stumble and heresy will continue to point out every grammical error i wrote and question me on it.
im here to read other ppls ideas and share ideas, not to have a 101 discussion war, which is why i didnt and wont be replying to your page 5 heresy.
i already told u my attention span is really short and if i have to reply then my reply would be longer, then yours will be even longer than that, and this will end up turning into a EDJ vs dirty shoez type of thing , and i DO NOT want to be forced to continue replying to long ass posts so lets keep these short n quick.
ps. i looked up Syncretism, and im not really merging shit. i mostly took all the bullshit out of religion
@EDJ
my guess would be if the cannibals think eating other dead ppl is wrong then its wrong on their part.
people are born in different times with different standards, so it all goes back to what the person himself thinks of his action.
^EXACTLY AT YOUR LAST SENTENCE. AND LOL @YOUR WHOLE REPLY AND COP OUT.
SO HOW DO THE CANNIBALS FIgURE IT'S WRONg? AND THERE'S MANY THOUgHTS AND PERCEPTION ABOUT DIFFERENT SITUATIONS AND REACTIONS. SO WHO'S TO SAY IS RIgHT? IF I'M AN ATHEIST, WHAT gUIDELINES DO I gO BY FOR MY MORALITY VERSUS A BIBLE THUMPER WHO INTERPRETS A SCRIPTURE gUIDELINE DIFFERENT FROM THE NEXT MAN?
SO HOW DO THE CANNIBALS FIgURE IT'S WRONg? AND THERE'S MANY THOUgHTS AND PERCEPTION ABOUT DIFFERENT SITUATIONS AND REACTIONS. SO WHO'S TO SAY IS RIgHT? IF I'M AN ATHEIST, WHAT gUIDELINES DO I gO BY FOR MY MORALITY VERSUS A BIBLE THUMPER WHO INTERPRETS A SCRIPTURE gUIDELINE DIFFERENT FROM THE NEXT MAN?
as long as the cannibals dont think its wrong to eat other humans then they are NOT doing anything wrong
again, it all goes down to what the person himself knows the action is, either good or bad
plus with the common sense that come as his conscious mind matures, he shouldnt have any trouble figuring out if somethin is wrong or right
if you think about the simplest, youngest form of a civilization.
only thing that u can ever judge somebody by is if they do good or bad.
once humanity evolved and now we got all sorts new ways of thinking and THAT is what i think also helped religion evolve.
i dunno if im making sense, but again this is all comming from me
so it could be right n could be wrong. but to me it seems pretty fuckin logical.
again, it all goes down to what the person himself knows the action is, either good or bad
plus with the common sense that come as his conscious mind matures, he shouldnt have any trouble figuring out if somethin is wrong or right
if you think about the simplest, youngest form of a civilization.
only thing that u can ever judge somebody by is if they do good or bad.
once humanity evolved and now we got all sorts new ways of thinking and THAT is what i think also helped religion evolve.
i dunno if im making sense, but again this is all comming from me
so it could be right n could be wrong. but to me it seems pretty fuckin logical.
My patience with you is growing thin, and I say that with a straight face.
Why do people repeat the same thing over and over? That kick in the throat might not be so bad for a person involved in S&M activities. The no food thing might be a good thing for a model who wants to be 96 lbs soaking wet. Think about it.
See the above.
I don't understand that BULLSHIT you typed. Hell, YOU don't understand it which is why you opened your post with "i meant to say". Look man, STOP assuming people know what you are talking about. We are not inside of your head and its not on us to assume anything. It's on you to present the info in a logical manner. Once you do that its on us to accept or reject. If we decide to reject it, show you why it was rejected and ask you questions you should be able to answer. If you can't stand the heat stay the fuck out the kitchen. It is that simple.
Truth be told,I haven't pointed out ONE of your grammatical errors YET. I am less concerned about your grammatical errors and more concerned about you addressing questions, providing clarification and elaborating your position in a logical manner. So far you have proved incapable of doing any of them, and I am begining to think I am wasting my time even reading your posts.
You accussed me of hating muslims, I called you on it, yet you wont provide proof of your claim? You say I am brainwashed by the media, I called you on it, yet you fail to validate your claim? You say I am angry, I show you I am not, yet you still think it. Incredible.
And what did you do with the leftovers? I'll show you what you did. You start babbling about demon possessed girls, muslims, priests, buddhist monks and snowflakes. You ARE merging shit and the fact you say "im not really merging shit" is a strong indicator that you know what you are doing.
You are merging shit and EDJ saw it which is why he told you all roads don't lead to Rome.
In closing I am trying to spare you. I understand you have a short attention span, and I know english isn't your first language, but this bs needs to stop. The next time I feel you are slinging mud I'm taking off the gloves. You have been warned.
Why do people repeat the same thing over and over? That kick in the throat might not be so bad for a person involved in S&M activities. The no food thing might be a good thing for a model who wants to be 96 lbs soaking wet. Think about it.
See the above.
I don't understand that BULLSHIT you typed. Hell, YOU don't understand it which is why you opened your post with "i meant to say". Look man, STOP assuming people know what you are talking about. We are not inside of your head and its not on us to assume anything. It's on you to present the info in a logical manner. Once you do that its on us to accept or reject. If we decide to reject it, show you why it was rejected and ask you questions you should be able to answer. If you can't stand the heat stay the fuck out the kitchen. It is that simple.
Truth be told,I haven't pointed out ONE of your grammatical errors YET. I am less concerned about your grammatical errors and more concerned about you addressing questions, providing clarification and elaborating your position in a logical manner. So far you have proved incapable of doing any of them, and I am begining to think I am wasting my time even reading your posts.
You accussed me of hating muslims, I called you on it, yet you wont provide proof of your claim? You say I am brainwashed by the media, I called you on it, yet you fail to validate your claim? You say I am angry, I show you I am not, yet you still think it. Incredible.
And what did you do with the leftovers? I'll show you what you did. You start babbling about demon possessed girls, muslims, priests, buddhist monks and snowflakes. You ARE merging shit and the fact you say "im not really merging shit" is a strong indicator that you know what you are doing.
You are merging shit and EDJ saw it which is why he told you all roads don't lead to Rome.
In closing I am trying to spare you. I understand you have a short attention span, and I know english isn't your first language, but this bs needs to stop. The next time I feel you are slinging mud I'm taking off the gloves. You have been warned.
i dont know what S&M is but the way u use it in a sentence, its not good.
and why do u gotta take every word i say and apply it to everybody?
i said "no food = hunger" to the cave man that has no knowledge of ANYTHING.
he will LEARN by going thru experiences where he HASNT ATE, and BECAME HUNGRY.
once he ate, he REALIZED no food causes hunger.
that explains how the person will learn good from bad.
i did NOT say "you should always eat" for you to apply this to a MODEL.
again this was an EXAMPLE of how the learning process goes.
i wish u would stop payin attention to the way i word things and start payin attention to what i am sayin.
it seems like ur just lookin to exploit the ones with weak vocab/english, because me and you already know there is no battle between us, u already win in THIS type of thing.
if we were to ever discuss shit face to face we will make a whole lot more sense to each other.
i accused you of hating muslims because i have never seen u talk so much shit about muslims without being asked for your opinion. (as in you were already in a conversation somebody said well check out those crazy muslims)
i was seein it for the first time a while back, and it slowly progressed, and now after readin this thread u seem to be on the COMPLETE OPPOSITE SIDE of muslims, AFTER they began rioting.
again, AFTER they began rioting is when i was like "damn, heresy really hates those muslims. he cant even see that u CANNOT judge all muslims based on the ones that sell alcohol just like you CANNOT judge all white people as being racists because white people are known to be racist."
and pay attention that i said AFTER they were ALL OVER THE MEDIA,which is completely reasonable for me to assume that the media has added to your hate towards them. because a whole lot of people that never even mention anything about todays events, began talkin shit after the muslims were constantly being portrayed as crazy and never to be touched, IN THE MEDIA.
Thats where i decided to question you.
everything i call out is based on my observation, not just "you said this, so u mean that"
notice how i gotta explain myself so many times because i have trouble expressing my thoughts. so dont expect me to contantly be providing you proof of what i mean and the evidence to support it.
ok again you dont seem to look at the EXAMPLES i give as EXAMPLES.
when i "MERGED" demon possessed girls, muslim shiekhs, and priests and buddhist monks i was merely giving PROOF of what i see.
read the example again. and instead of looking at it from an opposing point of view, try to see what im explaining.
it COMPLETELY makes sense.
ill break it down for you if you want. shiekh makes demon exit girl, priest makes demon exit girl.
THAT ALONE PROVES that the shiekh didnt get his abilities from God for being so pious, because if islam is the true religion, God wouldnt have given the ability to the priest right?
this is where we can COMPARE the 2, hmm lets see they are both pious....
enough said.
so i am not merging all of the religions n picking and choosing whats right and whats wrong.
"In closing I am trying to spare you. I understand you have a short attention span, and I know english isn't your first language, but this bs needs to stop. The next time I feel you are slinging mud I'm taking off the gloves. You have been warned."
its good to see you are trying to spare me, and its good to see that you are understanding why its hard for me to explain what im sayin, but i hope u dont think im scared of your word play for you to WARN ME.
what are u gonna do? tear me apart on this forum?
damn i should be shittin my pants!
cant let you own me on this FORUM!! ITS MY LIFE!!
so kiss my ass with your "NOBODY CAN WIN A DEBATE AGAINST ME" ego
again, i come here to learn and contribute, not to start arguements and try my best to win them to withhold my status as debate king
and why do u gotta take every word i say and apply it to everybody?
i said "no food = hunger" to the cave man that has no knowledge of ANYTHING.
he will LEARN by going thru experiences where he HASNT ATE, and BECAME HUNGRY.
once he ate, he REALIZED no food causes hunger.
that explains how the person will learn good from bad.
i did NOT say "you should always eat" for you to apply this to a MODEL.
again this was an EXAMPLE of how the learning process goes.
i wish u would stop payin attention to the way i word things and start payin attention to what i am sayin.
it seems like ur just lookin to exploit the ones with weak vocab/english, because me and you already know there is no battle between us, u already win in THIS type of thing.
if we were to ever discuss shit face to face we will make a whole lot more sense to each other.
i accused you of hating muslims because i have never seen u talk so much shit about muslims without being asked for your opinion. (as in you were already in a conversation somebody said well check out those crazy muslims)
i was seein it for the first time a while back, and it slowly progressed, and now after readin this thread u seem to be on the COMPLETE OPPOSITE SIDE of muslims, AFTER they began rioting.
again, AFTER they began rioting is when i was like "damn, heresy really hates those muslims. he cant even see that u CANNOT judge all muslims based on the ones that sell alcohol just like you CANNOT judge all white people as being racists because white people are known to be racist."
and pay attention that i said AFTER they were ALL OVER THE MEDIA,which is completely reasonable for me to assume that the media has added to your hate towards them. because a whole lot of people that never even mention anything about todays events, began talkin shit after the muslims were constantly being portrayed as crazy and never to be touched, IN THE MEDIA.
Thats where i decided to question you.
everything i call out is based on my observation, not just "you said this, so u mean that"
notice how i gotta explain myself so many times because i have trouble expressing my thoughts. so dont expect me to contantly be providing you proof of what i mean and the evidence to support it.
ok again you dont seem to look at the EXAMPLES i give as EXAMPLES.
when i "MERGED" demon possessed girls, muslim shiekhs, and priests and buddhist monks i was merely giving PROOF of what i see.
read the example again. and instead of looking at it from an opposing point of view, try to see what im explaining.
it COMPLETELY makes sense.
ill break it down for you if you want. shiekh makes demon exit girl, priest makes demon exit girl.
THAT ALONE PROVES that the shiekh didnt get his abilities from God for being so pious, because if islam is the true religion, God wouldnt have given the ability to the priest right?
this is where we can COMPARE the 2, hmm lets see they are both pious....
enough said.
so i am not merging all of the religions n picking and choosing whats right and whats wrong.
"In closing I am trying to spare you. I understand you have a short attention span, and I know english isn't your first language, but this bs needs to stop. The next time I feel you are slinging mud I'm taking off the gloves. You have been warned."
its good to see you are trying to spare me, and its good to see that you are understanding why its hard for me to explain what im sayin, but i hope u dont think im scared of your word play for you to WARN ME.
what are u gonna do? tear me apart on this forum?
damn i should be shittin my pants!
cant let you own me on this FORUM!! ITS MY LIFE!!
so kiss my ass with your "NOBODY CAN WIN A DEBATE AGAINST ME" ego
again, i come here to learn and contribute, not to start arguements and try my best to win them to withhold my status as debate king
Children of such little faith....
That's what I tell my mother after the fifth our father prayer.
I tell her that if she had any real faith she would stop after the first prayer.
That's what I say to wolves in sheeps clothing (Pat Robertson, Bush, O'Reily) when they say they support the death penalty. If you had any faith, you would trust that God will punish the guilty....
Same with these Islamic hot heads (which yes are only a small percentage of those with Islamic faith). Society labels these people fundamentalists, extremists, and radicals. Yet they show very little faith by taking justice in their own hands. Do they not trust that Allah will do away with the blasphemous infidels?
Such little faith for a people who exalt themselves as the most devoted to their deity of choice
That's what I tell my mother after the fifth our father prayer.
I tell her that if she had any real faith she would stop after the first prayer.
That's what I say to wolves in sheeps clothing (Pat Robertson, Bush, O'Reily) when they say they support the death penalty. If you had any faith, you would trust that God will punish the guilty....
Same with these Islamic hot heads (which yes are only a small percentage of those with Islamic faith). Society labels these people fundamentalists, extremists, and radicals. Yet they show very little faith by taking justice in their own hands. Do they not trust that Allah will do away with the blasphemous infidels?
Such little faith for a people who exalt themselves as the most devoted to their deity of choice