i dont know what S&M is but the way u use it in a sentence, its not good. and why do u gotta take every word i say and apply it to everybody?
i said "no food = hunger" to the cave man that has no knowledge of ANYTHING.he will LEARN by going thru experiences where he HASNT ATE, and BECAME HUNGRY. once he ate, he REALIZED no food causes hunger.
that explains how the person will learn good from bad.
that explains how the person will learn good from bad.
i did NOT say "you should always eat" for you to apply this to a MODEL.again this was an EXAMPLE of how the learning process goes.
i wish u would stop payin attention to the way i word things and start payin attention to what i am sayin.
it seems like ur just lookin to exploit the ones with weak vocab/english, because me and you already know there is no battle between us, u already win in THIS type of thing. if we were to ever discuss shit face to face we will make a whole lot more sense to each other.
i accused you of hating muslims because i have never seen u talk so much shit about muslims without being asked for your opinion. (as in you were already in a conversation somebody said well check out those crazy muslims)
i was seein it for the first time a while back, and it slowly progressed, and now after readin this thread u seem to be on the COMPLETE OPPOSITE SIDE of muslims, AFTER they began rioting.
again, AFTER they began rioting is when i was like "damn, heresy really hates those muslims. he cant even see that u CANNOT judge all muslims based on the ones that sell alcohol just like you CANNOT judge all white people as being racists because white people are known to be racist."
I did NOT judge all muslims based on the ones that sell alcohol. What I did was say "Muslims in america who own liquor stores = hypocrites." This statement LIMITS the scope to muslims to muslims in AMERICA who OWN liquor stores. I am beginging to think you have "issues" and I say that with a straight face.
and pay attention that i said AFTER they were ALL OVER THE MEDIA,which is completely reasonable for me to assume that the media has added to your hate towards them.
Thats where i decided to question you.everything i call out is based on my observation, not just "you said this, so u mean that"notice how i gotta explain myself so many times because i have trouble expressing my thoughts. so dont expect me to contantly be providing you proof of what i mean and the evidence to support it.
BEFORE YOU ATTEMPT TO EVALUATE THE THOUGHTS OF OTHERS, YOU YOURSELF SHOULD BE ABLE TO EXPRESS YOUR OWN THOUGHTS.
ok again you dont seem to look at the EXAMPLES i give as EXAMPLES.when i "MERGED" demon possessed girls, muslim shiekhs, and priests and buddhist monks i was merely giving PROOF of what i see. read the example again. and instead of looking at it from an opposing point of view, try to see what im explaining. it COMPLETELY makes sense. ill break it down for you if you want. shiekh makes demon exit girl, priest makes demon exit girl.THAT ALONE PROVES that the shiekh didnt get his abilities from God for being so pious, because if islam is the true religion, God wouldnt have given the ability to the priest right? this is where we can COMPARE the 2, hmm lets see they are both pious....enough said.
so i am not merging all of the religions n picking and choosing whats right and whats wrong.
its good to see you are trying to spare me, and its good to see that you are understanding why its hard for me to explain what im sayin, but i hope u dont think im scared of your word play for you to WARN ME.
what are u gonna do? tear me apart on this forum?
damn i should be shittin my pants! cant let you own me on this FORUM!! ITS MY LIFE!!
damn i should be shittin my pants! cant let you own me on this FORUM!! ITS MY LIFE!!
so kiss my ass with your "NOBODY CAN WIN A DEBATE AGAINST ME" ego
again, i come here to learn and contribute, not to start arguements and try my best to win them to withhold my status as debate king
http://www.english-at-home.com/