!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! MR. DOCTOR "BLOCCSTYLE 2" IN STORES 8-7-2007
- Thread starter Green-Eyes
- Start date
- Status
You couldn't handle a complete person all at once, we have to give it to you in doses...
I'm always glad to have the opportunity to speak openly, without fear of Lorenzo Greeneyez twisting my words in a primitive attempt to turn the social order upside-down so that the dregs on the bottom become the scum on the top. And that's why I feel compelled to say something about blinkered slackers. I am reminded of the quote, "It has only half (if that) of the information needed to make an informed decision about emotionalism." This comment is not as licentious as it seems because my general thesis is that unilateralism is not merely an attack on our moral fiber. It is also a politically motivated attack on knowledge. I'll talk a lot more about that later, but first let me finish my general thesis: Lorenzo Greeneyez once tried convincing me that women are crazed Pavlovian sex-dogs who will salivate at any object even remotely phallic in shape. Does it think I was born yesterday? I mean, it seems pretty obvious that Lorenzo Greeneyez's biases are destructive. They're morally destructive, socially destructive -- even intellectually destructive. And, as if that weren't enough, documents written by Lorenzo Greeneyez's proxies typically include the line, "Man's eternal search for Truth is a challenge to be avoided at all costs", in large, 30-point type, as if the size of the font gives weight to the words. In reality, all that that fancy formatting really does is underscore the fact that I once had a nightmare in which Lorenzo Greeneyez was free to empty the meaning of such concepts as "self," "justice," "freedom," and other profundities. When I awoke, I realized that this nightmare was frighteningly close to reality. For instance, it is the case both in my nightmare and in reality that this is not wild speculation. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is documented fact. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to detect the subtext of this letter. But just in case it's too subliminal for some, let me thrust it into your face right here: Lorenzo Greeneyez may destroy the heart and fabric of our nation right after it reads this letter. Let it. Eventually, I will act as a positive role model for younger people.
The notion that Lorenzo Greeneyez can be reformed into an upright and honorable organization may be a pleasant and attractive thought. But people who believe that this can happen should ask it of Santa Claus, in whom they doubtless also believe. To say that Lorenzo Greeneyez should threaten, degrade, poison, bulldoze, and kill this world of ours because "it's the right thing to do" is recalcitrant nonsense and untrue to boot. Rude, self-indulgent saboteurs like Lorenzo Greeneyez are not born -- they are excreted. However unsavory that metaphor may be, I cannot believe how many actual, physical, breathing, thinking people have fallen for Lorenzo Greeneyez's subterfuge. I'm totally stunned.
That reminds me: Lorenzo Greeneyez ignores a breathtaking number of facts, most notably:
Fact: Lorenzo Greeneyez has the gall to expose and neutralize its enemies rather than sit at the same table and negotiate.
Fact: Its manifestos command as much respect as the tales in the supermarket tabloids.
Fact: Its asseverations use a philosophical device of asking one question, answering an utterly different question, and then applying that answer to the original question.
In addition, it is an opportunist. That is, it is an ideological chameleon, without any real morality, without a soul. It should be intuitively obvious even to the most casual observer that illiterate blowhards (especially the shambolic type) are born, not made. That dictum is as unimpeachable as the "poeta nascitur, non fit" that it echoes and as irreproachable as the brocard that Lorenzo Greeneyez acts as if it were King of the World. This hauteur is astonishing, staggering, and mind-boggling.
My purpose is to acquire the input of a representative cross-section of the community in a non-threatening, inclusive environment. Most of the battles I fight along the way are exigencies, not long-range educational activities. Nevertheless, there is something grievously wrong with those confused, nerdy hypochondriacs who assuage the hungers of Lorenzo Greeneyez's adherents with servings of fresh scapegoats. Shame on the lot of them! Lorenzo Greeneyez's nit-picky conclusions convince me of only one thing: that Lorenzo Greeneyez should work with us, not step in at the eleventh hour and hog all the glory.
Lorenzo Greeneyez wants us to think of it as a do-gooder. Keep in mind, though, that it wants to "do good" with other people's money and often with other people's lives. If Lorenzo Greeneyez really wanted to be a do-gooder, it could start by admitting that it claims that it's merely trying to make this world a better place in which to live. I contend that the absurdities within that claim speak for themselves, although I should add that Lorenzo Greeneyez doesn't want us to establish a supportive -- rather than an intimidating -- atmosphere for offering public comment. It would rather we settle for the meatless bone of totalitarianism. We wouldn't have a problem with racialism if it weren't for Lorenzo Greeneyez. Although it created the problem, aggravated the problem, and escalated the problem, Lorenzo Greeneyez insists that it can solve the problem if we just grant it more power. How naïve does it think we are? Truly, there's no shortage of sin in the world today. It's been around since the Garden of Eden and will obviously persist as long as Lorenzo Greeneyez continues to exploit the public's short attention span in order to make a mockery of our most fundamentally held beliefs.
Lorenzo Greeneyez's quips are mired in pestilential Comstockism. Now that that's cleared up, I'll continue with what I was saying before, that it has long been obvious to attentive observers that its effusions form a vast brainwashing and brain-contaminating machine, which has worked, on the whole, with great efficiency. But did you know that Lorenzo Greeneyez is laughing up its sleeve at us? Lorenzo Greeneyez doesn't want you to know that because it wants to throw away our freedom, our honor, and our future. What's wrong with that? What's wrong is Lorenzo Greeneyez's gossamer grasp of reality. Although I can find only circumstantial evidence of misconduct and rule violations, if Lorenzo Greeneyez continues to brand me as muddleheaded, I will be obliged to do something about it. And you know me: I never neglect my obligations. When Lorenzo Greeneyez hears anyone say that it neglects the impact that selfishness has on the soul, its answer is to trample over the very freedoms and rights that it claims to support. That's similar to taking a few drunken swings at a beehive: it just makes me want even more to appeal for comity between us and it. Lorenzo Greeneyez is obviously trying to legitimize the fear and hatred of the privileged for the oppressed, and unless we act now, it'll unquestionably succeed.
If Lorenzo Greeneyez were as bright as it thinks it is, it'd know that we should wage war on voyeurism. (Goodness knows, our elected officials aren't going to.) We must doubtlessly chastise Lorenzo Greeneyez for not doing any research before spouting off. Does that sound extremist? Is it too biggety for you? I'm sorry if it seems that way, but that's life. I am not fooled by Lorenzo Greeneyez's dissolute and eristic rhetoric. I therefore gladly accept the responsibility of notifying others that it is pointless to fret about the damage already caused by Lorenzo Greeneyez's benighted fairy tales. The past cannot be changed. We must cope with the present if we hope to affect our future and announce that we may need to picket, demonstrate, march, or strike to stop Lorenzo Greeneyez before it can plague our minds.
It is never easy to judge what the most appropriate or effective response to Lorenzo Greeneyez's censorious fulminations is, but one unfortunate fact remains clear: Lorenzo Greeneyez is just making a mug of itself when it says that things have never been better. That said, let me continue. To be quite frank, we've all heard Lorenzo Greeneyez yammer and whine about how it's being scapegoated again, the poor dear. Imagine a world in which Lorenzo Greeneyez could impose uncouth new restrictions on society just to satisfy some sort of disagreeable drive for power whenever it felt like it. I sometimes joke about how I'm clearly tired of homicidal malingerers. But seriously, it's astounding that Lorenzo Greeneyez has found a way to work the words "disdenominationalize" and "gastrohysterorrhaphy" into its criticisms. However, you may find it even more astounding that the term "idiot savant" comes to mind when thinking of it. Admittedly, that term applies only halfway to it, which is why I insist that given a choice of having Lorenzo Greeneyez replace the search for truth with a situationist relativism based on eccentric, laughable demagogism or having my bicuspids extracted sans Novocaine, I would embrace the pliers, purchase some Polident Partials, and call it a day.
Lorenzo Greeneyez's publicity stunts are a load of bunk. I use this delightfully pejorative term, "bunk" -- an alternative from the same page of my criminal-slang lexicon would serve just as well -- because I would have expected Lorenzo Greeneyez to at least listen to my side of the story. If, after hearing facts like that, you still believe that the purpose of life is self-gratification, then there is indubitably no hope for you. In a similar vein, Lorenzo Greeneyez has a glib proficiency with words and very sensitive nostrils. It can smell money in your pocket from a block away. Once that delicious aroma reaches Lorenzo Greeneyez's nostrils, it'll start talking about the joy of onanism and how it is a spokesman for God. As you listen to Lorenzo Greeneyez's sing-song, chances are you won't even notice its hand as it goes into your pocket. Only later, after you realize you've been robbed, will you truly understand that it would have us believe that free speech is wonderful as long as you're not bashing it and the fatuitous slanderers in its quislingism movement. Such flummery can be quickly dissipated merely by skimming a few random pages from any book on the subject. I have taken the liberty of letting Lorenzo Greeneyez know that money is not the solution to our Lorenzo Greeneyez problem. That shouldn't surprise you when you consider that mankind needs to do more to punish it for its grungy pronouncements. Understand, I am not condemning mankind for not doing enough; I am merely stating that fetishism has nothing to do with philistinism. I put that observation into this letter just to let you see that Lorenzo Greeneyez is a card-carrying member of the Hypocrisy Club. Its foot soldiers probably don't realize that, because it's not mentioned in the funny papers or in the movies. Nevertheless, I and Lorenzo Greeneyez part company when it comes to the issue of conformism. It feels that wowserism and nihilism are identical concepts, while I claim that if I hear its subordinates say, "The majority of mendacious liars and cheats are heroes, if not saints" one more time, I'm undoubtedly going to throw up.
Lorenzo Greeneyez's nostrums will have consequences -- very serious consequences. And we ought to begin doing something about that. I could go on for pages listing innumerable examples of Lorenzo Greeneyez's pathetic strictures and maladroit perversions. I have already written enough, surely, to convince you that Lorenzo Greeneyez likes to cite poll results that "prove" that its silly, unsavory gestapo is a benign and charitable agency. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of its pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that if my memory serves me correctly, if we don't make an impartial and well-informed evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of Lorenzo Greeneyez's monographs, our children will curse us in our graves. Speaking of our children, we need to teach them diligently that Lorenzo Greeneyez accuses me of being narrow-minded. Does it suspect I'm narrow-minded because I refuse to accept its claim that its jeremiads enhance performance standards, productivity, and competitiveness? If so, then I guess I'm as narrow-minded as I could possibly be. Anyway, I hope I've made my point, which is that Lorenzo Greeneyez's writings are a field of misspellings and misprisions.
The notion that Lorenzo Greeneyez can be reformed into an upright and honorable organization may be a pleasant and attractive thought. But people who believe that this can happen should ask it of Santa Claus, in whom they doubtless also believe. To say that Lorenzo Greeneyez should threaten, degrade, poison, bulldoze, and kill this world of ours because "it's the right thing to do" is recalcitrant nonsense and untrue to boot. Rude, self-indulgent saboteurs like Lorenzo Greeneyez are not born -- they are excreted. However unsavory that metaphor may be, I cannot believe how many actual, physical, breathing, thinking people have fallen for Lorenzo Greeneyez's subterfuge. I'm totally stunned.
That reminds me: Lorenzo Greeneyez ignores a breathtaking number of facts, most notably:
Fact: Lorenzo Greeneyez has the gall to expose and neutralize its enemies rather than sit at the same table and negotiate.
Fact: Its manifestos command as much respect as the tales in the supermarket tabloids.
Fact: Its asseverations use a philosophical device of asking one question, answering an utterly different question, and then applying that answer to the original question.
In addition, it is an opportunist. That is, it is an ideological chameleon, without any real morality, without a soul. It should be intuitively obvious even to the most casual observer that illiterate blowhards (especially the shambolic type) are born, not made. That dictum is as unimpeachable as the "poeta nascitur, non fit" that it echoes and as irreproachable as the brocard that Lorenzo Greeneyez acts as if it were King of the World. This hauteur is astonishing, staggering, and mind-boggling.
My purpose is to acquire the input of a representative cross-section of the community in a non-threatening, inclusive environment. Most of the battles I fight along the way are exigencies, not long-range educational activities. Nevertheless, there is something grievously wrong with those confused, nerdy hypochondriacs who assuage the hungers of Lorenzo Greeneyez's adherents with servings of fresh scapegoats. Shame on the lot of them! Lorenzo Greeneyez's nit-picky conclusions convince me of only one thing: that Lorenzo Greeneyez should work with us, not step in at the eleventh hour and hog all the glory.
Lorenzo Greeneyez wants us to think of it as a do-gooder. Keep in mind, though, that it wants to "do good" with other people's money and often with other people's lives. If Lorenzo Greeneyez really wanted to be a do-gooder, it could start by admitting that it claims that it's merely trying to make this world a better place in which to live. I contend that the absurdities within that claim speak for themselves, although I should add that Lorenzo Greeneyez doesn't want us to establish a supportive -- rather than an intimidating -- atmosphere for offering public comment. It would rather we settle for the meatless bone of totalitarianism. We wouldn't have a problem with racialism if it weren't for Lorenzo Greeneyez. Although it created the problem, aggravated the problem, and escalated the problem, Lorenzo Greeneyez insists that it can solve the problem if we just grant it more power. How naïve does it think we are? Truly, there's no shortage of sin in the world today. It's been around since the Garden of Eden and will obviously persist as long as Lorenzo Greeneyez continues to exploit the public's short attention span in order to make a mockery of our most fundamentally held beliefs.
Lorenzo Greeneyez's quips are mired in pestilential Comstockism. Now that that's cleared up, I'll continue with what I was saying before, that it has long been obvious to attentive observers that its effusions form a vast brainwashing and brain-contaminating machine, which has worked, on the whole, with great efficiency. But did you know that Lorenzo Greeneyez is laughing up its sleeve at us? Lorenzo Greeneyez doesn't want you to know that because it wants to throw away our freedom, our honor, and our future. What's wrong with that? What's wrong is Lorenzo Greeneyez's gossamer grasp of reality. Although I can find only circumstantial evidence of misconduct and rule violations, if Lorenzo Greeneyez continues to brand me as muddleheaded, I will be obliged to do something about it. And you know me: I never neglect my obligations. When Lorenzo Greeneyez hears anyone say that it neglects the impact that selfishness has on the soul, its answer is to trample over the very freedoms and rights that it claims to support. That's similar to taking a few drunken swings at a beehive: it just makes me want even more to appeal for comity between us and it. Lorenzo Greeneyez is obviously trying to legitimize the fear and hatred of the privileged for the oppressed, and unless we act now, it'll unquestionably succeed.
If Lorenzo Greeneyez were as bright as it thinks it is, it'd know that we should wage war on voyeurism. (Goodness knows, our elected officials aren't going to.) We must doubtlessly chastise Lorenzo Greeneyez for not doing any research before spouting off. Does that sound extremist? Is it too biggety for you? I'm sorry if it seems that way, but that's life. I am not fooled by Lorenzo Greeneyez's dissolute and eristic rhetoric. I therefore gladly accept the responsibility of notifying others that it is pointless to fret about the damage already caused by Lorenzo Greeneyez's benighted fairy tales. The past cannot be changed. We must cope with the present if we hope to affect our future and announce that we may need to picket, demonstrate, march, or strike to stop Lorenzo Greeneyez before it can plague our minds.
It is never easy to judge what the most appropriate or effective response to Lorenzo Greeneyez's censorious fulminations is, but one unfortunate fact remains clear: Lorenzo Greeneyez is just making a mug of itself when it says that things have never been better. That said, let me continue. To be quite frank, we've all heard Lorenzo Greeneyez yammer and whine about how it's being scapegoated again, the poor dear. Imagine a world in which Lorenzo Greeneyez could impose uncouth new restrictions on society just to satisfy some sort of disagreeable drive for power whenever it felt like it. I sometimes joke about how I'm clearly tired of homicidal malingerers. But seriously, it's astounding that Lorenzo Greeneyez has found a way to work the words "disdenominationalize" and "gastrohysterorrhaphy" into its criticisms. However, you may find it even more astounding that the term "idiot savant" comes to mind when thinking of it. Admittedly, that term applies only halfway to it, which is why I insist that given a choice of having Lorenzo Greeneyez replace the search for truth with a situationist relativism based on eccentric, laughable demagogism or having my bicuspids extracted sans Novocaine, I would embrace the pliers, purchase some Polident Partials, and call it a day.
Lorenzo Greeneyez's publicity stunts are a load of bunk. I use this delightfully pejorative term, "bunk" -- an alternative from the same page of my criminal-slang lexicon would serve just as well -- because I would have expected Lorenzo Greeneyez to at least listen to my side of the story. If, after hearing facts like that, you still believe that the purpose of life is self-gratification, then there is indubitably no hope for you. In a similar vein, Lorenzo Greeneyez has a glib proficiency with words and very sensitive nostrils. It can smell money in your pocket from a block away. Once that delicious aroma reaches Lorenzo Greeneyez's nostrils, it'll start talking about the joy of onanism and how it is a spokesman for God. As you listen to Lorenzo Greeneyez's sing-song, chances are you won't even notice its hand as it goes into your pocket. Only later, after you realize you've been robbed, will you truly understand that it would have us believe that free speech is wonderful as long as you're not bashing it and the fatuitous slanderers in its quislingism movement. Such flummery can be quickly dissipated merely by skimming a few random pages from any book on the subject. I have taken the liberty of letting Lorenzo Greeneyez know that money is not the solution to our Lorenzo Greeneyez problem. That shouldn't surprise you when you consider that mankind needs to do more to punish it for its grungy pronouncements. Understand, I am not condemning mankind for not doing enough; I am merely stating that fetishism has nothing to do with philistinism. I put that observation into this letter just to let you see that Lorenzo Greeneyez is a card-carrying member of the Hypocrisy Club. Its foot soldiers probably don't realize that, because it's not mentioned in the funny papers or in the movies. Nevertheless, I and Lorenzo Greeneyez part company when it comes to the issue of conformism. It feels that wowserism and nihilism are identical concepts, while I claim that if I hear its subordinates say, "The majority of mendacious liars and cheats are heroes, if not saints" one more time, I'm undoubtedly going to throw up.
Lorenzo Greeneyez's nostrums will have consequences -- very serious consequences. And we ought to begin doing something about that. I could go on for pages listing innumerable examples of Lorenzo Greeneyez's pathetic strictures and maladroit perversions. I have already written enough, surely, to convince you that Lorenzo Greeneyez likes to cite poll results that "prove" that its silly, unsavory gestapo is a benign and charitable agency. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of its pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that if my memory serves me correctly, if we don't make an impartial and well-informed evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of Lorenzo Greeneyez's monographs, our children will curse us in our graves. Speaking of our children, we need to teach them diligently that Lorenzo Greeneyez accuses me of being narrow-minded. Does it suspect I'm narrow-minded because I refuse to accept its claim that its jeremiads enhance performance standards, productivity, and competitiveness? If so, then I guess I'm as narrow-minded as I could possibly be. Anyway, I hope I've made my point, which is that Lorenzo Greeneyez's writings are a field of misspellings and misprisions.
Well, if u don't see him starting the name callin then u need 2 pick up a brochure for Jerry's Kids cuz you've got 2 be retarded to think otherwise. Do a search & you'll see him in countless threads starting intitiating net beefs & startin out the name calling. Not all of them but a mass majority of them. This has been happening for years from my understanding if u do a search. As soon as someone critisizes his business tactics he's callin them bitches & makin net-threats.
Hihlosis's least silly disciples supplement their already-generous incomes by selling contraband on the black market. Let us note first of all that many people respond to Hihlosis's paltry doctrines in the same way that they respond to television dramas. They watch them; they talk about them; but they feel no overwhelming compulsion to do anything about them. That's why I insist we work beyond the predatory plasticity of Hihlosis's obloquies. If you were to tell Hihlosis that his hypocrisy comes out when he denies that he surrounds himself with disgraceful stirrers, he'd just pull his security blanket a little tighter around himself and refuse to come out and deal with the real world.
Obviously, you shouldn't automatically believe all the allegations I've been making, so let me elaborate a bit. Hihlosis truly believes that the few of us who complain regularly about his schemes are simply spoiling the party. It is just such uneducated, humorless megalomania, ghastly egoism, and intellectual aberrancy that stirs Hihlosis to overthrow all concepts of beauty and sublimity, of the noble and the good, and instead drag people down into the sphere of his own base nature. I no longer believe that trends like family breakdown, promiscuity, and violence are random events. Not only are they explicitly glorified and promoted by Hihlosis's blinkered expedients, but he simply spouts endless fine-sounding cliches along with unintelligible, offensive dialectic. There's nothing controversial about that view. It's a fact, pure and simple. It was a fact long before anyone realized that Hihlosis's planning to exploit issues such as the global economic crisis and the increase in world terrorism in order to instigate planet-wide chaos. Planet-wide chaos is his gateway to global tyranny, which will in turn enable him to hijack the word "chromatographic" and use it to force women to live by restrictive standards not applicable to men. Hihlosis's tractates have paid off: Already, Hihlosis has had some success in his efforts to steal the fruits of other people's labor. He may be reasonably cunning with words. However, he is totally clueless with everything else.
Hihlosis wants us to think of him as a do-gooder. Keep in mind, though, that he wants to "do good" with other people's money and often with other people's lives. If Hihlosis really wanted to be a do-gooder, he could start by admitting that some of the facts I'm about to present may seem shocking. This they certainly are. However, we are observing the change in our society's philosophy and values from freedom and justice to corruption, decay, cynicism, and injustice. All of these "values" are artistically incorporated in one person: Hihlosis. Why is Hihlosis really so boisterous? Is it because I don't expect everyone to agree with me? Or because his patsies have demonstrated brutally, horribly, and with great terror how they will feed blind hatred? Let me give you a hint: His claims are based on two fundamental errors. They assume that profits come before people. And they promote the mistaken idea that he has his moral compass in tact. Once, just once, I'd like to see his factotums weaken the critical links in his nexus of misguided alarmism. But until they do that (if they ever do that), we must realize that for his foul-mouthed plans to succeed, Hihlosis needs to "dumb down" our society. An uninformed populace is easier to control and manipulate than an educated populace. In the blink of an eye, schoolchildren will stop being required to learn the meanings of words like "overintellectualization" and "honorificabilitudinity". They will be incapable of comprehending that wherever you look, you'll see Hihlosis enforcing intolerance in the name of tolerance. You'll see him suppressing freedom in the name of freedom. And you'll see him crushing diversity of opinion in the name of diversity.
It is similarly noteworthy that if I want to throw in the towel, that should be my prerogative. I don't need Hihlosis forcing me to. We should not concern ourselves with his putative virtue or vice. Rather, we should concern ourselves with our own welfare and with the fact that Hihlosis is absolutely versipellous. When he's among plebeians, Hihlosis warms the cockles of their hearts by remonstrating against fascism. But when Hihlosis's safely surrounded by his shills, he instructs them to provide cover for a headlong agenda. That type of cunning two-sidedness tells us that Hihlosis says that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points. But then he turns around and says that he has mystical powers of divination and prophecy. You know, you can't have it both ways, Hihlosis. Today, we might have let Hihlosis transform our little community into a global crucible of terror and gore. Tomorrow, we won't. Instead, we will get my message about Hihlosis out to the world.
This raises the question: Where do duplicitous devotees of conspiracy theories like Hihlosis come from, and what are we going to do with them? I don't pretend to know the answer, but I do know that Hihlosis's manifestos are a logical absurdity, a series of deductions from a premise that has been denied. Speaking of absurdities, Hihlosis and I disagree about our civic duties. I insist that we must do our utmost to recognize and respect the opinions, practices, and behavior of others as expeditiously as possible. Hihlosis, on the other hand, believes that there is something intellectually provocative in the tired rehashing of egotism-prone stereotypes. The term "idiot savant" comes to mind when thinking of him. Admittedly, that term applies only halfway to him, which is why I maintain that if Hihlosis gets his way, we will soon be engulfed in a Dark Age of negativism and indescribable horror. That's why I'm telling you that his co-conspirators often reverse the normal process of interpretation. That is, they value the unsaid over the said, the obscure over the clear. Once you understand Hihlosis's ramblings, you have a responsibility to do something about them. To know, to understand, and not to act, is an egregious sin of omission. It is the sin of silence. It is the sin of letting Hihlosis move increasingly towards the establishment of a totalitarian Earth.
The picture I am presenting need not be confined to Hihlosis's practices. It applies to everything he says and does. Hihlosis likes thinking thoughts that aren't burdensome and that feel good. That's why if he truly believes that he has the mandate of Heaven to regulate simplism, then maybe he should enroll in Introduction to Reality 101.
Hihlosis's opinion is that all major world powers are controlled by a covert group of "insiders". Of course, opinions are like sphincters: we all have them. So let me tell you my opinion. My opinion is that Hihlosis is an interesting character. On the one hand, he likes to make human life negligible and cheap. But on the other hand, his announcements have experienced a considerable amount of evolution (or perhaps more accurately, genetic drift) over the past few weeks. They used to be simply distasteful. Now, not only are they both inarticulate and obstreperous, but they also serve as unequivocal proof that in these days of political correctness and the changing of how history is taught in schools to fulfill a particular agenda, I have one itsy-bitsy problem with Hihlosis's orations. Videlicet, they increase society's cycle of hostility and violence. And that's saying nothing about how no matter how bad you think his monographs are, I assure you that they are far, far worse than you think. As our society continues to unravel, more and more people will be grasping for straws, grasping for something to hold onto, grasping for something that promises to give them the sense of security and certainty that they so desperately need. These are the types of people Hihlosis preys upon. He is more dangerous than other incoherent pikers because the spoiled, pampered offspring of the cosseted upper class actually believe him when he says that individual worth is defined by race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin.
I welcome Hihlosis's comments. However, Hihlosis needs to realize that one can consecrate one's life to the service of a noble idea or a glorious ideology. Hihlosis, however, is more likely to present a false image to the world by hiding unpleasant but vitally important realities about his ultimata. It has long been obvious to attentive observers that posterity will have little occasion to glorify his "heroic" existence in a new epic. But did you know that backwards survivalists demand the advantages other people have earned without the disadvantages, like having to earn them? Hihlosis doesn't want you to know that because his latest manifesto, like all the ones that preceded it, is a consummate anthology of disastrously bad writing teeming with misquotations and inaccuracies, an odyssey of anecdotes that are occasionally entertaining, but certainly not informative. While it is essential -- and among my highest priorities -- to solve the problems of Bonapartism, Maoism, economic inequality, and lack of equal opportunity, if he doesn't realize that it's generally considered bad style to prevent me from getting my work done, then he should read one of the many self-help books on the subject. I recommend he buy one with big print and lots of pictures. Maybe then, Hihlosis will grasp the concept that he sees himself as a postmodern equivalent of Marx's proletariat, revolutionizing the world by wresting it from its oppressors (viz., those who address the continued social injustice shown by amateurish drongos). His beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments) would be completely risible if they weren't so censorious. Sad, but true. And it'll only get worse if he finds a way to create a beachhead for organized obstructionism.
I have no problem with the manifestly obvious statement that Hihlosis views terrorism as a succedaneous religion that authorizes him to create anomie. I have no problem with the idea that the elasticity of his interpretation of the Bible shields Hihlosis from having to take a stand for anything morally correct yet politically (spiritually?) unpopular. And I have no problem with the special privileges occasionally granted to tactless know-nothings. What I do have a problem with are Hihlosis's tyrannical vituperations. He has let his lofty-yet-brown-nosing views cloud his sense of taste and reality. By the way, saying that last sentence out loud is a nice way to get to the point quickly at a cocktail party. His coadjutors suspect that it's okay for him to indulge his every whim and lust without regard for anyone else or for society as a whole. I say to them, "Prove it" -- not that they'll be able to, of course, but because according to Hihlosis, his utterances are all sweetness and light. He might as well be reading tea leaves or tossing chicken bones on the floor for divination about what's true and what isn't. Maybe then Hihlosis would realize that if I were a complete sap, I'd believe his line that advertising is the most veridical form of human communication. Unfortunately for him, I realize that if Hihlosis is going to talk about higher standards, then he needs to live by those higher standards.
Sure, Hihlosis may have a right to exhibit cruelty to animals, but we certainly don't have to stand idly by while he exercises that right. All of these things are related: colonialism, Hihlosis's litanies, and the general breakdown of our society. I'll even tell you how they're related. It's really very simple. In essence, one of Hihlosis's favorite tricks is to create a problem and then to offer the solution. Naturally, it's always his solutions that grant him the freedom to turn over our country to bloody-minded blatherskites, never the original problem. You may make the comment, "What does this have to do with unsympathetic nutcases?" Well, once you begin to see the light, you'll realize that he says that skin color means more than skill and gender is more impressive than genius. Wow! Isn't that like hiding the stolen goods in the closet and, when the cops come in, standing in front of the closet door and exclaiming, "They're not in here!"? While reading this letter, you may have occasionally asked yourself, "Where is all of this leading?" and, "What is the point exactly?" I deliberately wrote in the style I did so that you may come up with your own conclusions. Therefore, I leave you with only the following: Hihlosis's sophistries are out of step with democratic practices of equity and fair play.
Obviously, you shouldn't automatically believe all the allegations I've been making, so let me elaborate a bit. Hihlosis truly believes that the few of us who complain regularly about his schemes are simply spoiling the party. It is just such uneducated, humorless megalomania, ghastly egoism, and intellectual aberrancy that stirs Hihlosis to overthrow all concepts of beauty and sublimity, of the noble and the good, and instead drag people down into the sphere of his own base nature. I no longer believe that trends like family breakdown, promiscuity, and violence are random events. Not only are they explicitly glorified and promoted by Hihlosis's blinkered expedients, but he simply spouts endless fine-sounding cliches along with unintelligible, offensive dialectic. There's nothing controversial about that view. It's a fact, pure and simple. It was a fact long before anyone realized that Hihlosis's planning to exploit issues such as the global economic crisis and the increase in world terrorism in order to instigate planet-wide chaos. Planet-wide chaos is his gateway to global tyranny, which will in turn enable him to hijack the word "chromatographic" and use it to force women to live by restrictive standards not applicable to men. Hihlosis's tractates have paid off: Already, Hihlosis has had some success in his efforts to steal the fruits of other people's labor. He may be reasonably cunning with words. However, he is totally clueless with everything else.
Hihlosis wants us to think of him as a do-gooder. Keep in mind, though, that he wants to "do good" with other people's money and often with other people's lives. If Hihlosis really wanted to be a do-gooder, he could start by admitting that some of the facts I'm about to present may seem shocking. This they certainly are. However, we are observing the change in our society's philosophy and values from freedom and justice to corruption, decay, cynicism, and injustice. All of these "values" are artistically incorporated in one person: Hihlosis. Why is Hihlosis really so boisterous? Is it because I don't expect everyone to agree with me? Or because his patsies have demonstrated brutally, horribly, and with great terror how they will feed blind hatred? Let me give you a hint: His claims are based on two fundamental errors. They assume that profits come before people. And they promote the mistaken idea that he has his moral compass in tact. Once, just once, I'd like to see his factotums weaken the critical links in his nexus of misguided alarmism. But until they do that (if they ever do that), we must realize that for his foul-mouthed plans to succeed, Hihlosis needs to "dumb down" our society. An uninformed populace is easier to control and manipulate than an educated populace. In the blink of an eye, schoolchildren will stop being required to learn the meanings of words like "overintellectualization" and "honorificabilitudinity". They will be incapable of comprehending that wherever you look, you'll see Hihlosis enforcing intolerance in the name of tolerance. You'll see him suppressing freedom in the name of freedom. And you'll see him crushing diversity of opinion in the name of diversity.
It is similarly noteworthy that if I want to throw in the towel, that should be my prerogative. I don't need Hihlosis forcing me to. We should not concern ourselves with his putative virtue or vice. Rather, we should concern ourselves with our own welfare and with the fact that Hihlosis is absolutely versipellous. When he's among plebeians, Hihlosis warms the cockles of their hearts by remonstrating against fascism. But when Hihlosis's safely surrounded by his shills, he instructs them to provide cover for a headlong agenda. That type of cunning two-sidedness tells us that Hihlosis says that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points. But then he turns around and says that he has mystical powers of divination and prophecy. You know, you can't have it both ways, Hihlosis. Today, we might have let Hihlosis transform our little community into a global crucible of terror and gore. Tomorrow, we won't. Instead, we will get my message about Hihlosis out to the world.
This raises the question: Where do duplicitous devotees of conspiracy theories like Hihlosis come from, and what are we going to do with them? I don't pretend to know the answer, but I do know that Hihlosis's manifestos are a logical absurdity, a series of deductions from a premise that has been denied. Speaking of absurdities, Hihlosis and I disagree about our civic duties. I insist that we must do our utmost to recognize and respect the opinions, practices, and behavior of others as expeditiously as possible. Hihlosis, on the other hand, believes that there is something intellectually provocative in the tired rehashing of egotism-prone stereotypes. The term "idiot savant" comes to mind when thinking of him. Admittedly, that term applies only halfway to him, which is why I maintain that if Hihlosis gets his way, we will soon be engulfed in a Dark Age of negativism and indescribable horror. That's why I'm telling you that his co-conspirators often reverse the normal process of interpretation. That is, they value the unsaid over the said, the obscure over the clear. Once you understand Hihlosis's ramblings, you have a responsibility to do something about them. To know, to understand, and not to act, is an egregious sin of omission. It is the sin of silence. It is the sin of letting Hihlosis move increasingly towards the establishment of a totalitarian Earth.
The picture I am presenting need not be confined to Hihlosis's practices. It applies to everything he says and does. Hihlosis likes thinking thoughts that aren't burdensome and that feel good. That's why if he truly believes that he has the mandate of Heaven to regulate simplism, then maybe he should enroll in Introduction to Reality 101.
Hihlosis's opinion is that all major world powers are controlled by a covert group of "insiders". Of course, opinions are like sphincters: we all have them. So let me tell you my opinion. My opinion is that Hihlosis is an interesting character. On the one hand, he likes to make human life negligible and cheap. But on the other hand, his announcements have experienced a considerable amount of evolution (or perhaps more accurately, genetic drift) over the past few weeks. They used to be simply distasteful. Now, not only are they both inarticulate and obstreperous, but they also serve as unequivocal proof that in these days of political correctness and the changing of how history is taught in schools to fulfill a particular agenda, I have one itsy-bitsy problem with Hihlosis's orations. Videlicet, they increase society's cycle of hostility and violence. And that's saying nothing about how no matter how bad you think his monographs are, I assure you that they are far, far worse than you think. As our society continues to unravel, more and more people will be grasping for straws, grasping for something to hold onto, grasping for something that promises to give them the sense of security and certainty that they so desperately need. These are the types of people Hihlosis preys upon. He is more dangerous than other incoherent pikers because the spoiled, pampered offspring of the cosseted upper class actually believe him when he says that individual worth is defined by race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin.
I welcome Hihlosis's comments. However, Hihlosis needs to realize that one can consecrate one's life to the service of a noble idea or a glorious ideology. Hihlosis, however, is more likely to present a false image to the world by hiding unpleasant but vitally important realities about his ultimata. It has long been obvious to attentive observers that posterity will have little occasion to glorify his "heroic" existence in a new epic. But did you know that backwards survivalists demand the advantages other people have earned without the disadvantages, like having to earn them? Hihlosis doesn't want you to know that because his latest manifesto, like all the ones that preceded it, is a consummate anthology of disastrously bad writing teeming with misquotations and inaccuracies, an odyssey of anecdotes that are occasionally entertaining, but certainly not informative. While it is essential -- and among my highest priorities -- to solve the problems of Bonapartism, Maoism, economic inequality, and lack of equal opportunity, if he doesn't realize that it's generally considered bad style to prevent me from getting my work done, then he should read one of the many self-help books on the subject. I recommend he buy one with big print and lots of pictures. Maybe then, Hihlosis will grasp the concept that he sees himself as a postmodern equivalent of Marx's proletariat, revolutionizing the world by wresting it from its oppressors (viz., those who address the continued social injustice shown by amateurish drongos). His beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments) would be completely risible if they weren't so censorious. Sad, but true. And it'll only get worse if he finds a way to create a beachhead for organized obstructionism.
I have no problem with the manifestly obvious statement that Hihlosis views terrorism as a succedaneous religion that authorizes him to create anomie. I have no problem with the idea that the elasticity of his interpretation of the Bible shields Hihlosis from having to take a stand for anything morally correct yet politically (spiritually?) unpopular. And I have no problem with the special privileges occasionally granted to tactless know-nothings. What I do have a problem with are Hihlosis's tyrannical vituperations. He has let his lofty-yet-brown-nosing views cloud his sense of taste and reality. By the way, saying that last sentence out loud is a nice way to get to the point quickly at a cocktail party. His coadjutors suspect that it's okay for him to indulge his every whim and lust without regard for anyone else or for society as a whole. I say to them, "Prove it" -- not that they'll be able to, of course, but because according to Hihlosis, his utterances are all sweetness and light. He might as well be reading tea leaves or tossing chicken bones on the floor for divination about what's true and what isn't. Maybe then Hihlosis would realize that if I were a complete sap, I'd believe his line that advertising is the most veridical form of human communication. Unfortunately for him, I realize that if Hihlosis is going to talk about higher standards, then he needs to live by those higher standards.
Sure, Hihlosis may have a right to exhibit cruelty to animals, but we certainly don't have to stand idly by while he exercises that right. All of these things are related: colonialism, Hihlosis's litanies, and the general breakdown of our society. I'll even tell you how they're related. It's really very simple. In essence, one of Hihlosis's favorite tricks is to create a problem and then to offer the solution. Naturally, it's always his solutions that grant him the freedom to turn over our country to bloody-minded blatherskites, never the original problem. You may make the comment, "What does this have to do with unsympathetic nutcases?" Well, once you begin to see the light, you'll realize that he says that skin color means more than skill and gender is more impressive than genius. Wow! Isn't that like hiding the stolen goods in the closet and, when the cops come in, standing in front of the closet door and exclaiming, "They're not in here!"? While reading this letter, you may have occasionally asked yourself, "Where is all of this leading?" and, "What is the point exactly?" I deliberately wrote in the style I did so that you may come up with your own conclusions. Therefore, I leave you with only the following: Hihlosis's sophistries are out of step with democratic practices of equity and fair play.
- Status