!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! MR. DOCTOR "BLOCCSTYLE 2" IN STORES 8-7-2007

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jul 27, 2007
1,174
0
0
59
Bubble Hash said:
He posted this over 4 hours ago. The CD was probably so bad he shot himself in the head.
He probably just actually has a life and things to do rather than be here 24/7... Us grown folk do that, yah know.
 
May 30, 2006
7,310
71
0
48
Satingun said:
I've always held the belief that a punk resorts to name-calling and insults when he doesn't have a decent enough command of the English language to communicate in better dialogue, or he's simply unable to keep up with enough wit to keep it moving.
Isn't that what ur grandson Green Eyes iz doing? I haven't seen u qoute him one time but u get @ everyone else.
 
Mar 15, 2006
569
0
0
45
Satingun said:
He probably just actually has a life and things to do rather than be here 24/7... Us grown folk do that, yah know.
Yeah senior citizens have a bangin life right? Find a wrinkle and fuck it. I WORK on the Internet, what's your excuse? You're on here as much as I am...just like ol' Brown-Eye.
 

El D

Sicc OG
Mar 7, 2006
3,234
6
0
Green-Eyes's ploys are entirely disgusting -- so much so, that if there are any children or sensitive people reading this letter, I suggest that they stop now and not read what I am about to describe. Let me get to the crux of the matter: Green-Eyes's fantasy is to rip off everyone and his brother. He dreams of a world that grants him such a freedom with no strings attached. Welcome to the world of immoralism! In that nightmare world it has long since been forgotten that I like to speak of Green-Eyes as "obscene". That's a reasonable term to use, I assert, but let's now try to understand it a little better. For starters, there is an unpleasant fact, painful to the tender-minded, that one can deduce from the laws of nature. This fact is also conclusively established by direct observation. It is a fact so obvious that rational people have always known it and no one doubted it until Green-Eyes and his peons started trying to deny it. The fact to which I am referring states that Green-Eyes ignores the most basic ground rule of debate. In case you're not familiar with it, that rule is: attack the idea, not the person. The basal lie that underlies all of Green-Eyes's dangerous witticisms is that society is supposed to be lenient towards chthonic-to-the-core deviants. Translation: Green-Eyes's refrains are our final line of defense against tyrrany. I doubt you need any help from me to identify the supreme idiocy of those views, but you should nevertheless be aware that I wouldn't want to intensify or perpetuate anarchism. I would, on the other hand, love to oppose Green-Eyes and all he stands for. But, hey, I'm already doing that with this letter. So who's crazy? I, or all the truculent cowards who aver that the Eleventh Commandment is, "Thou shalt eavesdrop on all types of private conversations"? Before you answer, let me point out that at this point in the letter, I had planned to tell you that many of Green-Eyes's ruses have been criticized for being slanted in favor of a particular stance. However, one of my colleagues pointed out that his logodaedaly is frighteningly successful at convincing the worst sorts of abysmal, foolhardy despots there are that all it takes to solve our social woes are shotgun marriages, heavy-handed divorce laws, and a return to some mythical 1950s Shangri-la. Hence, I discarded the discourse I had previously prepared and substituted the following discussion, in which I argue that Green-Eyes's a pretty good liar most of the time. However, he tells so many lies, he's bound to trip himself up someday.

Green-Eyes can blame me for the influx of domineering profiteers if it makes him feel better, but it won't help his cause any. Griping about Green-Eyes will not make him stop trying to condone illegal activities. But even if it did, he would just find some other way to fleece us. There is absolutely nothing that birdbrained lounge lizards like him will not do to destroy their enemies. They will poke into the most secret family affairs and not rest until their truffle-searching instinct digs up some frowzy incident that is calculated to finish off their unfortunate victim.

There are two reasons which induce me to submit Green-Eyes's communications to a special examination: 1) I trust Green-Eyes about as far as I can throw him, and 2) it's time to put up or shut up. I must admit that the second point, in particular, sometimes fills me with anxious concern. His grunts want so much to champion censorship in the name of free speech, intolerance in the name of tolerance, and oppression in the name of freedom that the concept of right vs. wrong never comes up. Am I saying that the pragmatist position is that his modus operandi is to slander those who are most systematically undervalued, underpaid, underemployed, underfinanced, underinsured, underrated, and otherwise underserved and undermined as undeserving and underclass? Yes. That our real enemy is the inerudite system that made him as headlong as he is? Maybe. That his violations of the rules of decency are so brown-nosing they beggar belief? Definitely. The moral of the story: Giving Green-Eyes the means to organize a whispering campaign against me is like supplying the gun to your own robber
 
Apr 25, 2007
1,079
10
0
38
El D said:
Green-Eyes's ploys are entirely disgusting -- so much so, that if there are any children or sensitive people reading this letter, I suggest that they stop now and not read what I am about to describe. Let me get to the crux of the matter: Green-Eyes's fantasy is to rip off everyone and his brother. He dreams of a world that grants him such a freedom with no strings attached. Welcome to the world of immoralism! In that nightmare world it has long since been forgotten that I like to speak of Green-Eyes as "obscene". That's a reasonable term to use, I assert, but let's now try to understand it a little better. For starters, there is an unpleasant fact, painful to the tender-minded, that one can deduce from the laws of nature. This fact is also conclusively established by direct observation. It is a fact so obvious that rational people have always known it and no one doubted it until Green-Eyes and his peons started trying to deny it. The fact to which I am referring states that Green-Eyes ignores the most basic ground rule of debate. In case you're not familiar with it, that rule is: attack the idea, not the person. The basal lie that underlies all of Green-Eyes's dangerous witticisms is that society is supposed to be lenient towards chthonic-to-the-core deviants. Translation: Green-Eyes's refrains are our final line of defense against tyrrany. I doubt you need any help from me to identify the supreme idiocy of those views, but you should nevertheless be aware that I wouldn't want to intensify or perpetuate anarchism. I would, on the other hand, love to oppose Green-Eyes and all he stands for. But, hey, I'm already doing that with this letter. So who's crazy? I, or all the truculent cowards who aver that the Eleventh Commandment is, "Thou shalt eavesdrop on all types of private conversations"? Before you answer, let me point out that at this point in the letter, I had planned to tell you that many of Green-Eyes's ruses have been criticized for being slanted in favor of a particular stance. However, one of my colleagues pointed out that his logodaedaly is frighteningly successful at convincing the worst sorts of abysmal, foolhardy despots there are that all it takes to solve our social woes are shotgun marriages, heavy-handed divorce laws, and a return to some mythical 1950s Shangri-la. Hence, I discarded the discourse I had previously prepared and substituted the following discussion, in which I argue that Green-Eyes's a pretty good liar most of the time. However, he tells so many lies, he's bound to trip himself up someday.

Green-Eyes can blame me for the influx of domineering profiteers if it makes him feel better, but it won't help his cause any. Griping about Green-Eyes will not make him stop trying to condone illegal activities. But even if it did, he would just find some other way to fleece us. There is absolutely nothing that birdbrained lounge lizards like him will not do to destroy their enemies. They will poke into the most secret family affairs and not rest until their truffle-searching instinct digs up some frowzy incident that is calculated to finish off their unfortunate victim.

There are two reasons which induce me to submit Green-Eyes's communications to a special examination: 1) I trust Green-Eyes about as far as I can throw him, and 2) it's time to put up or shut up. I must admit that the second point, in particular, sometimes fills me with anxious concern. His grunts want so much to champion censorship in the name of free speech, intolerance in the name of tolerance, and oppression in the name of freedom that the concept of right vs. wrong never comes up. Am I saying that the pragmatist position is that his modus operandi is to slander those who are most systematically undervalued, underpaid, underemployed, underfinanced, underinsured, underrated, and otherwise underserved and undermined as undeserving and underclass? Yes. That our real enemy is the inerudite system that made him as headlong as he is? Maybe. That his violations of the rules of decency are so brown-nosing they beggar belief? Definitely. The moral of the story: Giving Green-Eyes the means to organize a whispering campaign against me is like supplying the gun to your own robber
wow that made absolutely no sense! congratulations!
 
Jun 5, 2004
21,357
22,474
0
38
El D said:
Green-Eyes's ploys are entirely disgusting -- so much so, that if there are any children or sensitive people reading this letter, I suggest that they stop now and not read what I am about to describe. Let me get to the crux of the matter: Green-Eyes's fantasy is to rip off everyone and his brother. He dreams of a world that grants him such a freedom with no strings attached. Welcome to the world of immoralism! In that nightmare world it has long since been forgotten that I like to speak of Green-Eyes as "obscene". That's a reasonable term to use, I assert, but let's now try to understand it a little better. For starters, there is an unpleasant fact, painful to the tender-minded, that one can deduce from the laws of nature. This fact is also conclusively established by direct observation. It is a fact so obvious that rational people have always known it and no one doubted it until Green-Eyes and his peons started trying to deny it. The fact to which I am referring states that Green-Eyes ignores the most basic ground rule of debate. In case you're not familiar with it, that rule is: attack the idea, not the person. The basal lie that underlies all of Green-Eyes's dangerous witticisms is that society is supposed to be lenient towards chthonic-to-the-core deviants. Translation: Green-Eyes's refrains are our final line of defense against tyrrany. I doubt you need any help from me to identify the supreme idiocy of those views, but you should nevertheless be aware that I wouldn't want to intensify or perpetuate anarchism. I would, on the other hand, love to oppose Green-Eyes and all he stands for. But, hey, I'm already doing that with this letter. So who's crazy? I, or all the truculent cowards who aver that the Eleventh Commandment is, "Thou shalt eavesdrop on all types of private conversations"? Before you answer, let me point out that at this point in the letter, I had planned to tell you that many of Green-Eyes's ruses have been criticized for being slanted in favor of a particular stance. However, one of my colleagues pointed out that his logodaedaly is frighteningly successful at convincing the worst sorts of abysmal, foolhardy despots there are that all it takes to solve our social woes are shotgun marriages, heavy-handed divorce laws, and a return to some mythical 1950s Shangri-la. Hence, I discarded the discourse I had previously prepared and substituted the following discussion, in which I argue that Green-Eyes's a pretty good liar most of the time. However, he tells so many lies, he's bound to trip himself up someday.

Green-Eyes can blame me for the influx of domineering profiteers if it makes him feel better, but it won't help his cause any. Griping about Green-Eyes will not make him stop trying to condone illegal activities. But even if it did, he would just find some other way to fleece us. There is absolutely nothing that birdbrained lounge lizards like him will not do to destroy their enemies. They will poke into the most secret family affairs and not rest until their truffle-searching instinct digs up some frowzy incident that is calculated to finish off their unfortunate victim.

There are two reasons which induce me to submit Green-Eyes's communications to a special examination: 1) I trust Green-Eyes about as far as I can throw him, and 2) it's time to put up or shut up. I must admit that the second point, in particular, sometimes fills me with anxious concern. His grunts want so much to champion censorship in the name of free speech, intolerance in the name of tolerance, and oppression in the name of freedom that the concept of right vs. wrong never comes up. Am I saying that the pragmatist position is that his modus operandi is to slander those who are most systematically undervalued, underpaid, underemployed, underfinanced, underinsured, underrated, and otherwise underserved and undermined as undeserving and underclass? Yes. That our real enemy is the inerudite system that made him as headlong as he is? Maybe. That his violations of the rules of decency are so brown-nosing they beggar belief? Definitely. The moral of the story: Giving Green-Eyes the means to organize a whispering campaign against me is like supplying the gun to your own robber
co-sign


lol
 
Mar 15, 2006
569
0
0
45
Soundscan numbers for Blocc St. Lye 2 - 4 units sold at the same store, from a man that goes out to his car, changes his clothes and personality, then comes in and buys another one.
 
May 30, 2006
7,310
71
0
48
Bubble Hash said:
Soundscan numbers for Blocc St. Lye 2 - 4 units sold at the same store, from a man that goes out to his car, changes his clothes and personality, then comes in and buys another one.
LMMFAO!!! Damn homie stop it. I'm dying over here.

Watch these fools log on in a couple of days lying about how their show was crackin blah blah blah
 
Mar 26, 2007
1,319
0
0
Satingun said:
He probably just actually has a life and things to do rather than be here 24/7... Us grown folk do that, yah know.

Exactly^^ I work on the net too but it doesnt mean I have to devote my self to it allday everyday like most of peeps do. The net can get boring for me real quik, unless I'm makin skrilla or obtaining value info, besides that I'm about buisness plain n simple.

The album is hard, I have to say Mr.Doctor came way better with this one then the last one, I'm not going to get all into it and have a 5 paragraph review I'm just speakin on the shit I liked which was most of the album, couple tracks he used other peeps beats but there gansta as fuck and he made em sound just as good. The line-up is not bad, I was expecting to hear some new foe loco and some new Oddysee type shit but its all gravy.

The hardest songs to my ears is "Thug In Me Ft. Black Rhino" and of course "Vibrations Ft. Adrain baker of beach boys"/ "fellas" which he talks about true shit about being in the game and how getting into the game.

album has alot of Gangsta then again it has some sentimental shit, a new path Doc took towards this album he changed up the stlye a lil bit but then again he still had the OG settrippin blockstlye persona, good features "Lo Cel", Ap.9's"D.C." Blach Rhino came hella grity with it but of course DOC came the best. Big Q, I havent really heard of him but his lyrics was knockin and him and Doc rap good together.

Good shit from Epedemic, everybody represented and there wasnt no faulty shit talkin in the album, its all about makin money, fuckin bitches, doin the gangsta shit niggaz do.

I've only bumped the whole cd once, but right now I'm slappin it and it gets better and better everytime I listen, the beats are nice and crisp, little bit of hyphy but moslty gangsta.

questions I have is what happend to Foe Loco?
 
Mar 15, 2006
569
0
0
45
gthug619 said:
Exactly^^ I work on the net too but it doesnt mean I have to devote my self to it allday everyday like most of peeps do. The net can get boring for me real quik, unless I'm makin skrilla or obtaining value info, besides that I'm about buisness plain n simple.
Nobody said you have to devote your life to it. That 50 year old grandmother of Brown-Eye is the one you're responding to. If you can't tell that the "he must have died" shit is just messin around, then that's on you. No need to go emo on us.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.