DJ Mark 7 said:
Any PURE BAY mix that you've ever seen me do, it was available for FREE on the net...I wasn't tryin to profit off it.
Right on... That's how I feel about the situation too. I'm a fan first and foremost anyway so I don't even think its my place to speak on it as a DJ, but if I do a mix, its for free... always.
I love Bay music and I deejay so putting down some mixes of what was crackin in the Bay was as I enjoy it (not everything is about scrill) and because I want to promote Bay music.
I can see how in the Bay with easy access to all these artists music it might seem like the artists being ripped off being on mixes, but I was trying to touch an audience of don't knows.
Being in Europe that's kind of easy because I'm peeping the mix to cats who never heard most of the artists. And I know people who've asked questions and peeped CD's as a result.
And off this site and others a lot of Bay cats have downloaded my mix too.. and I'm sure rather than being at the expense of buying an album, they went swooped CD's of artists I played.
That is promotion plain and simple so I would laugh at the idea I've taken bread off someone's table, I've done the opposite, and matter of fact it costs me money when I put mixes up.
I'm sure Mark, or the Siccness Radio cats will tell you. When you download it costs that site bandwidth. My last mix was 75MB and was downloaded 500-1000 times. I paid for that.
I'm not involved enough to speak on anyone else business and I'm not here to do that, but I will say that this is a nice thread, its a question which needed asking at the moment.
Unless I see an artist on a mixtape hosting that shit and making it official, I don't know where the selling bit comes from apart from someone getting their hustle on, since it ain't official.
But as far as putting it down free goes, in so far as what Mark does, and what I did a couple of times... does anyone affiliated with artists have a problem with that? Why would they?
I can't see it... Anyway we all got common sense and can tell the difference between some cat throwing half of someones new album on a so-called mixtape, and a real mix.
So to me Dana and Angie are right to ask that question, I ain't mad at it, matter of fact I'm interested myself - its a mixtape every minute at the moment and they all cost....
That's a lot of extra competition for a fans money, so it is some shit that will take food out the actual artists mouths. And to do that with their own material... that's an issue right there.
Interesting post nonetheless... I hope people who do it for free (and like Mark says, play a variety of artists, not just rip off a bunch of tracks) keep it moving, to me they promoting.
1