Luke Ridnour>Steve Nash...

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Aug 20, 2004
5,174
5
0
#25
MrFedEx503 said:
says the person who's team who has a worse record
LOL, you wanna turn this into a Raider vs San Fran thing?All im sayin is, you have no room to talk with your horrid team. The Sonics and Blazers are seperated by 1 game. Cmon guy, get a clue.
 
Jun 27, 2005
5,207
0
0
#26
^^^No room to talk? Remember opening night in Seattle? See where Seattle is ranked? Thats room to talk. Oh yeah, and Jarrett Jack is as good or better in his 2nd year than Ridnour is in his fourth:

Year Team G GS MPG FG% 3p% FT% RPG APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG
06-07 POR 25 25 36.0 .467 .216 .895 2.8 6.0 1.3 0.1 2.40 2.80 13.2

Therefore Jarrett Jack > Steve Nash lol. Be serious.
 
Aug 20, 2004
5,174
5
0
#27
XxtraMannish said:
^^^No room to talk? Remember opening night in Seattle? See where Seattle is ranked? Thats room to talk. Oh yeah, and Jarrett Jack is as good or better in his 2nd year than Ridnour is in his fourth:

Year Team G GS MPG FG% 3p% FT% RPG APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG
06-07 POR 25 25 36.0 .467 .216 .895 2.8 6.0 1.3 0.1 2.40 2.80 13.2

Therefore Jarrett Jack > Steve Nash lol. Be serious.
Im very serious. And Portland fans still have no room to talk. Thanks for playing.
 
Sep 4, 2002
10,105
61
0
38
#32
Gringo Starr said:
LOL, you wanna turn this into a Raider vs San Fran thing?All im sayin is, you have no room to talk with your horrid team. The Sonics and Blazers are seperated by 1 game. Cmon guy, get a clue.
i got a clue, and a 5 game win streak.
 
Sep 4, 2002
10,105
61
0
38
#33
Gringo Starr said:
Im very serious. And Portland fans still have no room to talk. Thanks for playing.
and seattle fans do? you guys lost your fuckin team for shits sake. there will be no more seattle team, cuz the next expantion team will most likley be in vegas
 
Apr 25, 2002
3,970
15
38
42
#37
MrFedEx503 said:
^ lets get real here, YOU know deep down, its bound to happen
There is a strong possibility, no doubt.

Our only prayer is metro area size (we are #13, OKC is #45). Either Bellevue (a rich suburb for those who don't know) steps up, or they're gone.

**Edit: And certainly the way this year is going won't help. On a special promotion, I bought $250 worth of tickets for $40 outside a drugs store today, he was an official team rep, so obviously they are getting a little desperate.
 
May 10, 2002
4,203
7
38
48
#38
Gringo Starr said:
...in the 4th year of play. Side by side, Luke in his 4th year is better than Steve Nash in his 4th year. Check it out:

Steve Nash:

Year Team G GS MPG FG% 3p% FT% OFF DEF RPG APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG
99-00 DAL 56 27 27.4 .477 .403 .882 0.6 1.6 2.2 4.9 0.7 0.0 1.82 2.20 8.6



Luke Ridnour:

Year Team G GS MPG FG% 3p% FT% OFF DEF RPG APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG
06-07 SEA 26 26 34.5 .469 .414 .764 0.7 2.2 2.9 6.2 1.2 0.3 2.77 2.80 14.6



Why did I post this? It seems alot of people in Seattle DONT like him. I find it very funny that Luke, in his 4th year, is as good as Nash in his 4th year. But, what has Nash donw anyway????
I'm curious as to how you can make that statement when you're comparing 56 games worth of stats (Nash) to 26 games worth of stats (Ridnour).
 
Nov 16, 2004
849
26
0
#39
MrPeete said:
I'm curious as to how you can make that statement when you're comparing 56 games worth of stats (Nash) to 26 games worth of stats (Ridnour).
For real, stats don't tell everything. Luke in his 4th year has much more NBA playing time than Nash in his 4th year. Nash got limited minutes playing behind KJ at Phx. In his 3rd year he was injured and played only half the season in his first starting role. Luke became pretty much a starter in his 2nd year after old GP was traded so he has 2 years of starting PT under his belt as opposed to Nash's 1/2 a season...But there's no denying Luke's talent, especially after he continuously stabbed the Warriors in the heart at Seattle, buzzer beater after buzzer beater in the 4th, wow.

Oh yeah and by the way, Warriors > Sonics/Blazers