Luke Ridnour>Steve Nash...

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Gringo Starr

Gringo Starr

Sicc OG
#1
Aug 20, 2004
5,174
5
0
#1
...in the 4th year of play. Side by side, Luke in his 4th year is better than Steve Nash in his 4th year. Check it out:

Steve Nash:

Year Team G GS MPG FG% 3p% FT% OFF DEF RPG APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG
99-00 DAL 56 27 27.4 .477 .403 .882 0.6 1.6 2.2 4.9 0.7 0.0 1.82 2.20 8.6


Luke Ridnour:

Year Team G GS MPG FG% 3p% FT% OFF DEF RPG APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG
06-07 SEA 26 26 34.5 .469 .414 .764 0.7 2.2 2.9 6.2 1.2 0.3 2.77 2.80 14.6


Why did I post this? It seems alot of people in Seattle DONT like him. I find it very funny that Luke, in his 4th year, is as good as Nash in his 4th year. But, what has Nash donw anyway????
 
xpanther206

xpanther206

Sicc OG
#10
Apr 25, 2002
3,970
15
38
40
#10
He's definitely exceeded my expectations this year, he's been a pleasant surprise.

I think the #1 reason why a lot of folks out here dislike him is that he plays zero defense, we grew accustomed to defense first GP at the point for all those years, now we've got a guy with a lot of offensive potential but can't keep somebody in front of him.
 
D'struction

D'struction

Sicc OG
#12
Apr 14, 2003
6,415
154
63
37
#12
im willin to put 100 G's on it that hes not a real mob anything too....haha

I was about to ask why people dont like him, I think he's a baller...one of my favs from the Chronics
 
MrFedEx503

MrFedEx503

Sicc OG
#13
Sep 4, 2002
10,105
61
0
37
#13
Gringo Starr said:
...in the 4th year of play. Side by side, Luke in his 4th year is better than Steve Nash in his 4th year. Check it out:

Steve Nash:

Year Team G GS MPG FG% 3p% FT% OFF DEF RPG APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG
99-00 DAL 56 27 27.4 .477 .403 .882 0.6 1.6 2.2 4.9 0.7 0.0 1.82 2.20 8.6


Luke Ridnour:

Year Team G GS MPG FG% 3p% FT% OFF DEF RPG APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG
06-07 SEA 26 26 34.5 .469 .414 .764 0.7 2.2 2.9 6.2 1.2 0.3 2.77 2.80 14.6


Why did I post this? It seems alot of people in Seattle DONT like him. I find it very funny that Luke, in his 4th year, is as good as Nash in his 4th year. But, what has Nash donw anyway????
Click to expand...

This in NO WAY SHAPE OR FORM, makes Luke better then steve nash... Was this supposed to be a joke?
 
MrFedEx503

MrFedEx503

Sicc OG
#15
Sep 4, 2002
10,105
61
0
37
#15
xpanther206 said:
He's definitely exceeded my expectations this year, he's been a pleasant surprise.

I think the #1 reason why a lot of folks out here dislike him is that he plays zero defense, we grew accustomed to defense first GP at the point for all those years, now we've got a guy with a lot of offensive potential but can't keep somebody in front of him.
Click to expand...
lol , then again no one on seattle plays D
 
MrFedEx503

MrFedEx503

Sicc OG
#20
Sep 4, 2002
10,105
61
0
37
#20
Gringo Starr said:
You act like i made those stats up. Personally, i could care less what YOU think of Luke.
Click to expand...
yeah but you did make up the fact that he's better at this point, which may be true it stat form. But you know Luke>Steve is bullshit
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom