Jury debates over Scott Peterson’s fate…

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
K

kiyoung80

Fresh
#1
Nov 2, 2004
2
0
0
#1
So the trial for the “husband from hell” is just about over. With the closing arguments complete, now we all have to wait for the jury to deliberate.

How does everyone feel about this case? Do you think he’ll walk or get what he deserves? Also – I’ve been told that the judge is only going to give a 2-hour notice once the jury has reached its verdict. We do have a cable TV in the lounge area here at work, so I’ve been setting it to Court TV to try and keep up-to-date. I even noticed on their website that you can get the verdict sent to your cell phone, which is pretty crazy (though I’m the only one of my friends without one yet!)

Personally, there’s nothing I’d rather see than a death sentence for this disgusting human, though life in prison wouldn’t be a bad 2nd option either.

Kimberly
 
S

SoContajuS

Sicc OG
#3
Jul 26, 2002
410
1
0
#3
Deep down inside I believe he is Guilty.

But I don't think the prosecution has enough evidence against him to convict him of murder. He won't get the death penalty.
 
WT SAVAGE

WT SAVAGE

Sicc OG
#4
May 4, 2002
10,364
20,642
113
#4
i dunno if he did it or not, im leaning towards he didnt...... b/c i know how shady ass cops do things when they have no suspects, n want to pin shit on somebody.
 
T

Tony

Sicc OG
#5
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
48
#5
I think he did it because he didn't show any emotion for a man that's lost his pregnant wife, he never took a polygraph, and he didn't take the stand. He's a cheater, liar, etc... He didn't go the full level to prove his innocence. He was fishing in the same place the bodies washed ashore? Hmmmmm....
 
gimpypimp

gimpypimp

Sicc OG
#7
May 2, 2002
3,895
163
0
#7
Tony said:
I think he did it because he didn't show any emotion for a man that's lost his pregnant wife, he never took a polygraph, and he didn't take the stand. He's a cheater, liar, etc... He didn't go the full level to prove his innocence. He was fishing in the same place the bodies washed ashore? Hmmmmm....
Click to expand...
How are you supposed to act? Is there a rule that says you have to act a specific way? And they had video/audio of him crying. Could he be faking? Maybe.

Polygraphs are not 100% accurate. Why take one, tell the truth, and then have it come out that you lied. Either way, they are inadmissible.

Cheating, lying, showing no remorse...shit...he could have stomped on her grave. None of that proves he did anything.

I think he did it too, but from following the case...I don't think the prosecution proved a damn thing. No motive, murder weapon, eye witnesses...they have nothing.

We can all say hang the motherfucker...but what if he is innocent. He could be.
 
Jae iLL

Jae iLL

Sicc OG
#11
Jun 27, 2003
2,457
10
0
39
#11
nah.. but if he DIDNT do it, and he gets gassed, it aint gon give you no hope.. and for doode that said he didn't go to his fullest to PROVE his innocence? tha fuck? wha happened to innocent until proven guilty? aint that a muthafucka? Even if he DID do it, if the prosecution dont do it's job, he should walk. Cuz who's to say they won't present a strong case when it's ur turn to go on trial for some shit u aint do and u still get convicted...
 
T

Tony

Sicc OG
#12
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
48
#12
gimpypimp said:
How are you supposed to act? Is there a rule that says you have to act a specific way? And they had video/audio of him crying. Could he be faking? Maybe.

Polygraphs are not 100% accurate. Why take one, tell the truth, and then have it come out that you lied. Either way, they are inadmissible.

Cheating, lying, showing no remorse...shit...he could have stomped on her grave. None of that proves he did anything.

I think he did it too, but from following the case...I don't think the prosecution proved a damn thing. No motive, murder weapon, eye witnesses...they have nothing.

We can all say hang the motherfucker...but what if he is innocent. He could be.
Click to expand...
What do you mean how are you supposed to act? No there is not a rule how you're supposed to act if you did or didn't kill your pregnant wife... but common sense and human nature should tell you that you'd cry your ass off if your pregnant wife came up missing. By him not crying or showing any emotion tells me that he could probably care less. Where was the audio/video of him crying? When he was interviewed by channel 2 news it looked like to me that he was just trying his hardest to keep a straight face.

No polygraphs aren't 100% but his reason for not taking one is because he was afraid that the test would make him nervous. He's a liar so he knew he wouldn't pass. If he did take one and passed that would of helped his case very much. But no he didn't take one because deep down inside he knew he was going to fail. Guilty conscience!

Cheating and lying says one thing about a person... can't be trusted! He was lying to both women and living a double life. The prosecution don't have to prove that much. All they have to do is "prove beyond reasonable doubt"... Of course there's no evidence because of the decomposed body. Who says you need a murder weapon to kill someone? He could of poisoned her or something.

How did the bodies make it out to the water? The person responsible needed a boat right? Does Scott Peterson own a boat? Who was probably the last person to see Laci Peterson? Why was Scott near the Mexico border with his hair dyed a different color, with 15,000 in cash, and 4 cell phones? Scott thought he could get away if he got rid of the evidence. He's going to get convicted of second degree murder! He's done! There's not way he can get away.
 
T

Tony

Sicc OG
#13
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
48
#13
Jae iLL said:
nah.. but if he DIDNT do it, and he gets gassed, it aint gon give you no hope.. and for doode that said he didn't go to his fullest to PROVE his innocence? tha fuck? wha happened to innocent until proven guilty? aint that a muthafucka? Even if he DID do it, if the prosecution dont do it's job, he should walk. Cuz who's to say they won't present a strong case when it's ur turn to go on trial for some shit u aint do and u still get convicted...
Click to expand...
Ask yourself this... if your pregnant wife came up missing and the police were trying to accuse you, wouldn't you go the extra mile to prove your innocence so the police could remove the focus away from you?
 
28g w/o the bag

28g w/o the bag

politically incorrect
#14
Jan 18, 2003
21,687
6,965
113
metro's jurisdiction
siccness.net
#14
Jae iLL said:
nah.. but if he DIDNT do it, and he gets gassed, it aint gon give you no hope.. and for doode that said he didn't go to his fullest to PROVE his innocence? tha fuck? wha happened to innocent until proven guilty? aint that a muthafucka? Even if he DID do it, if the prosecution dont do it's job, he should walk. Cuz who's to say they won't present a strong case when it's ur turn to go on trial for some shit u aint do and u still get convicted...
Click to expand...
lol... i don't know... but if i was dude and i was innocent... and i received a 'guilty' verdict and the death penalty.... i'd be tossing chairs all over that courtroom........

fuck it, you might as well cut loose.... it doesn't get worse than a death penalty anyways
 
T

Tony

Sicc OG
#16
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
48
#16
That's true... there is no hard evidence because he got rid of the evidence. He did a good job. He's a sneaky dude... you see how Amber didn't even know he was a married man.
 
T

Tony

Sicc OG
#17
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
48
#17
Scott Peterson went fishing on the day his wife disappeared near the same place that his wife's and unborn child's bodies washed ashore.
 
S

SoContajuS

Sicc OG
#18
Jul 26, 2002
410
1
0
#18
I think Scott acted suspicious. Tony you forgot to mention he was caught with his brother's ID card as well when he was near the Mexican border in San Diego. This guy was trying to disappear, there's no question about that.
 
DubbC415

DubbC415

Mickey Fallon
#19
Sep 10, 2002
22,620
6,984
0
39
Tomato Alley
#19
he also had 10,000 cash in his pocket, and his hair dyed...i mean, honestly, its all too coincidental, all the things he did....i guess someone could make a case that maybe he got in a fight with his wife and decided to take off for a break, but WHO ELSE is going to murder someones wife in that fashion? personally, i think he might have paid someone off for it. however, again, theres not enough hard evidence to convict him.
 
S

SoContajuS

Sicc OG
#20
Jul 26, 2002
410
1
0
#20
I think the same way DubbC415 does. If Scott didn't do it, he paid someone to do it. Either way he is Guilty. He acted way to suspicious .... he is involved some way.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom