Iran most likely to hit Israel

[Hemp]

also check this :

There has been a heated debate on the internet about whether the two Israeli soldiers kidnapped by Hizbullah that day were captured in Israel or in Lebanon, but it now seems pretty clear that they were seized in Israel. This is what the UN says, and even Hizbullah seems to have forgotten that they were supposed to have been found sneaking around the outskirts of the Lebanese village of Aita al-Shaab. Now it simply states that "the Islamic resistance captured two Israeli soldiers at the border with occupied Palestine". Three other Israeli soldiers were killed by the militants. There is also some dispute about when, on July 12, Hizbullah first fired its rockets; but Unifil makes it clear that the firing took place at the same time as the raid - 9am. Its purpose seems to have been to create a diversion. No one was hit.

obviously hes not sure and he wasnt there...

 

[ALL BOUT CHICKEN]

all i know, is fuck this war shit.

 

[Y-S]

all i know, is fuck this war shit.

ya same.....middle east that, middle east this, smh lol....oh well

 

[HERESY]

THANKS FOR PROVING WHAT I ALLREADY KNEW.

So, you are thanking this man for citing a single source that claims Israel intentions were to strike in the first place, but that the troops were captured in Israel?

LMAO! Thanks for making a claim and not being able to back it up. :dead:

 

[Solitary 1]

So, you are thanking this man for citing a single source that claims Israel intentions were to strike in the first place, but that the troops were captured in Israel?

LMAO! Thanks for making a claim and not being able to back it up. :dead:

YES, I AM. THE ARTCILE IS CORRECT IN THE CLAIM THAT ISRAEL WAS WAITING FOR PROVOCATION. THEY WERE.

AS FAR AS BACKING IT UP. LIKE I SAID.. I PROBABLY HAVE SAID ENOUGH ABOUT THE SUBJECT. "BACKING IT UP," IN YOUR EYES IS NOT SOMETHING I AM THE LEAST BIT CONCERNED WITH.

YOU ENJOY YOUR CRACKPOT, INTERNET NEWS SOURCES. THEY HAVE EDUCATED YOU WELL, INDEED.

:dead:

 

[HERESY]

YES, I AM. THE ARTCILE IS CORRECT IN THE CLAIM THAT ISRAEL WAS WAITING FOR PROVOCATION. THEY WERE.

The article also claims that the assualt had been "planned for months", and that ISRAEL was doing the planning.

The assault had been planned for months.

Israel's assault, then, was premeditated: it was simply waiting for an appropriate excuse. It was also unnecessary.

AS FAR AS BACKING IT UP. LIKE I SAID.. I PROBABLY HAVE SAID ENOUGH ABOUT THE SUBJECT.

So why are you still here posting? If you've said enough about the subject you wouldn't even reply.

"BACKING IT UP," IN YOUR EYES IS NOT SOMETHING I AM THE LEAST BIT CONCERNED WITH.

Oh wait!!! I get it now!!! Its for OTHER people to do and for you to CHEER LEAD when they do so!!!! Man, I FINALLY get it. YOU are concerned with making claims that you yourself have no evidence of, yet you want others to do the work for you and cite articles where the author doesn't provide proof to support the claim that the people were snatched in Israel!!!!!

YOU ENJOY YOUR CRACKPOT, INTERNET NEWS SOURCES.

What crackpot news sources? whatreallyhappened simply contains LINKS to the sources that said they were captured in Lebanon. The sources/articles/links cited are:

FORBES
YAHOO
ASIA TIMES
SF GATE
and CHINA BROADCAST

SINCE WHEN HAVE THESE SITES BECOME CRACKPOT INTERNET NEWS SOURCES? These are UNBIASED sources, so it was only fair for me to list them when I listed biased sources like antiwar.com

In the future, refrain from making unfounded claims, they do little to cast you in the light as a somewhat intelligent soul.

THEY HAVE EDUCATED YOU WELL, INDEED.

About as much as you have, I'd bet.

:dead: