Goodbye to Gary Payton...

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Feb 22, 2006
511
0
0
40
#21
I think payton is better than pierce and allen easily, and garnett is better than payton, but because of his size garnett would score almost everytime on gary in o 1-1 game, but with his size comes disadvantage and he would probably foul payton everytime he had the ball because of his speed and smaller size. (this being in thier primes of course)
 
Sep 4, 2002
10,105
61
0
38
#24
So because KG is ''very good'' and ''huge''...he'd destroy him? How so?

If it's because of size...who's to say GP wouldn't just play the perimeter? He'd blow by KG. ROFL...you're trying to use ''because he's huge'' as an arguement, and call what I said ''just stupid'', and you use that as your reasoning?

Of course they're all ''different types of players''...

Payton is a slasher, passer, scorer...with great defensive skills

Garnet is a rebounder, with soft touch around the hoop, more of a 'finesse' player, IMO.

Pierce is a scorer; period. Uncanny knack for getting good shots off under duress.

Allen is a great shooter, with one of the best strokes I've ever seen.

Like I said...OVERALL, GP, in his prime, was the better player OVERALL. Also, like I said, I.M.O.

Agree or not, but at least come with something better than ''he's huge'' to call my arguement ''just stupid''...
are you trying to compare them as if they were playing one on one?