FUck the siccness

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

infinity

( o )( o )
May 4, 2005
16,188
64,830
113
39
UOENO, CA
#21
To delegitimize William206, we need to begin with a frank acknowledgment of the basic humanness of each of us. And we must acknowledge that there are other strains of parasitism active today, and the siren calls of those movements may mesmerize sophomoric barrators whose grotty behavior blinds them to historical lessons. Instead of focusing on why that's why I laugh when I hear William206's operatives go on and on about antipluralism, I would like to remind people that William206 had promised us liberty, equality, and fraternity. Instead, he gave us misoneism, anti-intellectualism, and cameralism. I suppose we should have seen that coming, especially since William206's disquisitions are a perfect example of overgeneralization and blatant interdenominationalism. It is no more complicated than that.

Even people who consider themselves tendentious charlatans generally agree that William206 argues that we should all bear the brunt of his actions. I wish I could suggest some incontrovertible chain of apodictic reasoning that would overcome this argument, but the best I can do is the following: He apparently believes that he is known for his sound judgment, unerring foresight, and sagacious adaptation of means to ends. You and I know better than that. You and I know that by promoting both emotionalism and McCarthyism, William206's communications are doubly contemptuous. The best example of this, culled from many, would have to be the time William206 tried to disguise the complexity of color, the brutality of class, and the importance of religion and sexual identity in the construction and practice of collectivism.

I, hardheaded cynic that I am, have a New Year's resolution for William206: He should pick up a book before he jumps to the pushy conclusion that 75 million years ago, a galactic tyrant named Xenu solved the overpopulation problem of his 76-planet federation by transporting the excess people to Earth, chaining them to volcanoes, and dropping H-bombs on them. Rude, impetuous wackos have no business here. If you find that fact distressing then you should help me provide an antidote to contemporary manifestations of dysfunctional phallocentrism. Either that, or you can crawl into a corner and lament that you got yourself born in the wrong universe. Don't expect your sobbing to do much good, however, because I am aware that many people may object to the severity of my language. But is there no cause for severity? Naturally, I contend that there is because feelings of inferiority are characteristic of petulant slumlords. In this case, one cannot help but recall that I challenge him to point out any text in this letter that proposes that war is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength. It isn't there. There's neither a hint nor a suggestion of such a thing. Now that this letter has come to an end, I hope you walk away from it realizing that I wish William206 would vanish into the same logistical nothingness that his arguments invariably lead to.
 
Jun 27, 2003
2,457
10
0
39
#23
To delegitimize William206, we need to begin with a frank acknowledgment of the basic humanness of each of us. And we must acknowledge that there are other strains of parasitism active today, and the siren calls of those movements may mesmerize sophomoric barrators whose grotty behavior blinds them to historical lessons. Instead of focusing on why that's why I laugh when I hear William206's operatives go on and on about antipluralism, I would like to remind people that William206 had promised us liberty, equality, and fraternity. Instead, he gave us misoneism, anti-intellectualism, and cameralism. I suppose we should have seen that coming, especially since William206's disquisitions are a perfect example of overgeneralization and blatant interdenominationalism. It is no more complicated than that.

Even people who consider themselves tendentious charlatans generally agree that William206 argues that we should all bear the brunt of his actions. I wish I could suggest some incontrovertible chain of apodictic reasoning that would overcome this argument, but the best I can do is the following: He apparently believes that he is known for his sound judgment, unerring foresight, and sagacious adaptation of means to ends. You and I know better than that. You and I know that by promoting both emotionalism and McCarthyism, William206's communications are doubly contemptuous. The best example of this, culled from many, would have to be the time William206 tried to disguise the complexity of color, the brutality of class, and the importance of religion and sexual identity in the construction and practice of collectivism.

I, hardheaded cynic that I am, have a New Year's resolution for William206: He should pick up a book before he jumps to the pushy conclusion that 75 million years ago, a galactic tyrant named Xenu solved the overpopulation problem of his 76-planet federation by transporting the excess people to Earth, chaining them to volcanoes, and dropping H-bombs on them. Rude, impetuous wackos have no business here. If you find that fact distressing then you should help me provide an antidote to contemporary manifestations of dysfunctional phallocentrism. Either that, or you can crawl into a corner and lament that you got yourself born in the wrong universe. Don't expect your sobbing to do much good, however, because I am aware that many people may object to the severity of my language. But is there no cause for severity? Naturally, I contend that there is because feelings of inferiority are characteristic of petulant slumlords. In this case, one cannot help but recall that I challenge him to point out any text in this letter that proposes that war is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength. It isn't there. There's neither a hint nor a suggestion of such a thing. Now that this letter has come to an end, I hope you walk away from it realizing that I wish William206 would vanish into the same logistical nothingness that his arguments invariably lead to.

yea, what homeboy said..
 
Mar 21, 2007
5,310
8
0
www.com
#25
oh yeah, it was Bigchill,

i remember that, he clowned the hell out of a bunch of them


i couldnt believe it at first, cause i heard these rappers from CD's me and my homies used to bump since middleschool

then i saw them get roasted on a message board, and i was like

"WTF?"
 
Apr 9, 2005
9,480
78
0
42
www.myspace.com
#27
To delegitimize William206, we need to begin with a frank acknowledgment of the basic humanness of each of us. And we must acknowledge that there are other strains of parasitism active today, and the siren calls of those movements may mesmerize sophomoric barrators whose grotty behavior blinds them to historical lessons. Instead of focusing on why that's why I laugh when I hear William206's operatives go on and on about antipluralism, I would like to remind people that William206 had promised us liberty, equality, and fraternity. Instead, he gave us misoneism, anti-intellectualism, and cameralism. I suppose we should have seen that coming, especially since William206's disquisitions are a perfect example of overgeneralization and blatant interdenominationalism. It is no more complicated than that.

Even people who consider themselves tendentious charlatans generally agree that William206 argues that we should all bear the brunt of his actions. I wish I could suggest some incontrovertible chain of apodictic reasoning that would overcome this argument, but the best I can do is the following: He apparently believes that he is known for his sound judgment, unerring foresight, and sagacious adaptation of means to ends. You and I know better than that. You and I know that by promoting both emotionalism and McCarthyism, William206's communications are doubly contemptuous. The best example of this, culled from many, would have to be the time William206 tried to disguise the complexity of color, the brutality of class, and the importance of religion and sexual identity in the construction and practice of collectivism.

I, hardheaded cynic that I am, have a New Year's resolution for William206: He should pick up a book before he jumps to the pushy conclusion that 75 million years ago, a galactic tyrant named Xenu solved the overpopulation problem of his 76-planet federation by transporting the excess people to Earth, chaining them to volcanoes, and dropping H-bombs on them. Rude, impetuous wackos have no business here. If you find that fact distressing then you should help me provide an antidote to contemporary manifestations of dysfunctional phallocentrism. Either that, or you can crawl into a corner and lament that you got yourself born in the wrong universe. Don't expect your sobbing to do much good, however, because I am aware that many people may object to the severity of my language. But is there no cause for severity? Naturally, I contend that there is because feelings of inferiority are characteristic of petulant slumlords. In this case, one cannot help but recall that I challenge him to point out any text in this letter that proposes that war is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength. It isn't there. There's neither a hint nor a suggestion of such a thing. Now that this letter has come to an end, I hope you walk away from it realizing that I wish William206 would vanish into the same logistical nothingness that his arguments invariably lead to.
lol thats just too long of a post to even read.
 
Aug 11, 2003
1,106
12
0
39
#32
To delegitimize William206, we need to begin with a frank acknowledgment of the basic humanness of each of us. And we must acknowledge that there are other strains of parasitism active today, and the siren calls of those movements may mesmerize sophomoric barrators whose grotty behavior blinds them to historical lessons. Instead of focusing on why that's why I laugh when I hear William206's operatives go on and on about antipluralism, I would like to remind people that William206 had promised us liberty, equality, and fraternity. Instead, he gave us misoneism, anti-intellectualism, and cameralism. I suppose we should have seen that coming, especially since William206's disquisitions are a perfect example of overgeneralization and blatant interdenominationalism. It is no more complicated than that.

Even people who consider themselves tendentious charlatans generally agree that William206 argues that we should all bear the brunt of his actions. I wish I could suggest some incontrovertible chain of apodictic reasoning that would overcome this argument, but the best I can do is the following: He apparently believes that he is known for his sound judgment, unerring foresight, and sagacious adaptation of means to ends. You and I know better than that. You and I know that by promoting both emotionalism and McCarthyism, William206's communications are doubly contemptuous. The best example of this, culled from many, would have to be the time William206 tried to disguise the complexity of color, the brutality of class, and the importance of religion and sexual identity in the construction and practice of collectivism.

I, hardheaded cynic that I am, have a New Year's resolution for William206: He should pick up a book before he jumps to the pushy conclusion that 75 million years ago, a galactic tyrant named Xenu solved the overpopulation problem of his 76-planet federation by transporting the excess people to Earth, chaining them to volcanoes, and dropping H-bombs on them. Rude, impetuous wackos have no business here. If you find that fact distressing then you should help me provide an antidote to contemporary manifestations of dysfunctional phallocentrism. Either that, or you can crawl into a corner and lament that you got yourself born in the wrong universe. Don't expect your sobbing to do much good, however, because I am aware that many people may object to the severity of my language. But is there no cause for severity? Naturally, I contend that there is because feelings of inferiority are characteristic of petulant slumlords. In this case, one cannot help but recall that I challenge him to point out any text in this letter that proposes that war is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength. It isn't there. There's neither a hint nor a suggestion of such a thing. Now that this letter has come to an end, I hope you walk away from it realizing that I wish William206 would vanish into the same logistical nothingness that his arguments invariably lead to.

some of it was funny.. but you made you point in the first 6 line you need to stop trying so hard
 

V

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
5,308
137
0
41
#37
  • V

    V

^^^everytime, i see someone actually take the time to read the whole thing...haha