From Pro Football TalkPOSTED 7:30 p.m. EST, February 29, 2008
BROWNS COULD STILL TRADE ANDERSON
Throughout the afternoon, we were flooded with e-mails from folks peddling rumors that the Browns might have signed quarterback Derek Anderson to a three-year contract merely in advance of trading him.
Our first reaction was that the Browns wouldn't want to make a huge bonus payment to Anderson and then trade him and an incur a huge cap hit. But then it occurred to us that maybe the trigger date for the first payment is far enough into the future (for example, one or two weeks) to gives the Browns an opportunity to move him.
It wouldn't be definitive proof that there will be a trade; it would merely be evidence that a trade could happen. And we've learned that the first payment is due to Anderson . . . in April.
Again, this doesn't mean that he'll be traded. But unless and until that big payment is made there will be a window of opportunity for the Browns to move him. Stay tuned
BROWNS COULD STILL TRADE ANDERSON
Throughout the afternoon, we were flooded with e-mails from folks peddling rumors that the Browns might have signed quarterback Derek Anderson to a three-year contract merely in advance of trading him.
Our first reaction was that the Browns wouldn't want to make a huge bonus payment to Anderson and then trade him and an incur a huge cap hit. But then it occurred to us that maybe the trigger date for the first payment is far enough into the future (for example, one or two weeks) to gives the Browns an opportunity to move him.
It wouldn't be definitive proof that there will be a trade; it would merely be evidence that a trade could happen. And we've learned that the first payment is due to Anderson . . . in April.
Again, this doesn't mean that he'll be traded. But unless and until that big payment is made there will be a window of opportunity for the Browns to move him. Stay tuned