E-mails reveal Sonics owners intended to bolt from Seattle

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jun 13, 2002
13,154
525
113
siccness.net
#61
Upcoming vote unlikely to settle Sonics' relocation saga
Associated Press
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3352121&campaign=rss&source=NBAHeadlines


SEATTLE -- The supposedly obsolete arena is dark. After enduring billionaire power plays, broken promises and the team's worst season ever, Seattle is on the brink of losing its first big-time sports franchise.

On Friday, NBA owners are set to approve the SuperSonics' move to Oklahoma City. The last two votes on moves -- the Hornets from Charlotte to New Orleans and the Grizzlies from Vancouver to Memphis -- passed by a combined vote of 59-1.

"I just want to know if we're going to leave or stay," rookie superstar Kevin Durant said Thursday as he cleaned out his locker after a dismal 20-62 season.

Sorry, Kevin. Friday's approval won't quite decide whether 41 years of NBA history in the city is over.

"I'm not so worried about the board of governors' vote, really," Seattle mayor Greg Nickels said Thursday. "We expect they are going to approve it ... convincingly. We're really focused on litigation."

Yes, this two-year saga will likely be settled in court. Or with Sonics owner and Oklahoma City tycoon Clay Bennett writing a huge check to avoid the courts, a windfall Seattle might not be able to refuse.

The city has already rejected Bennett's offer of $26 million to settle the lease agreement, which runs through 2010.

Nickels laughed and declined to directly answer three different questions on whether there is a price at which Seattle would agree to let Bennett take the Sonics to Oklahoma.

"We intend to have the Sonics be a part of our community for a long, long time" is all the mayor, who stood on the downtown sidewalks for the Sonics' parade after they won the NBA title in 1979, would say.

Seattle's best hope to at least delay the Sonics' flight to Oklahoma City is a three-pronged legal fight against Bennett and his partners:

• A trial, set to begin June 16, in which the city is trying to force the team to play out its KeyArena lease.

•A class-action lawsuit brought by season ticket-holders who say they were duped into buying tickets under the premise the Sonics wouldn't leave.

•Former team owner Howard Schultz's new plans to sue to get the team back.

The Smooth-talking Starbucks chairman -- widely considered the villain in this civic drama -- is citing new evidence indicating Bennett's group lied while promising to make a good-faith effort to keep the team in Seattle.

The federal judge hearing the city's lawsuit forced the team to give Seattle's lawyers damning e-mails between Bennett and his partners. The messages display their eagerness to move the team to Oklahoma City almost as soon as they bought it.

Even so, Schultz's lawsuit has provoked the same bitter laughter among Seattlites that greeted news of the sale, which he pitched then as a wake-up call to local officials.

"If the city didn't believe we'd potentially move the team, we obviously have a group now that does have an out," Schultz said in 2006.

Frustrated by state and local officials' unwillingness to foot the bill to renovate KeyArena, Schultz sold the team to Bennett for a profit of $69 million in 2006. Bennett, Schultz argued, had better leverage to negotiate for a new arena because he had his eager hometown with a six-year-old building waiting if he failed.

Instead, Bennett focused on relocating the Sonics to his hometown after his proposal for a new arena in the suburbs, which he bragged would be the most expensive arena ever built, died in the Legislature. Then lawmakers spurned Microsoft CEO Steve's Ballmer's 11th-hour offer of big bucks.

Bennett has defended his efforts to keep the team in Seattle. He cites his many trips here, the consultants he hired and the money he spent toward finding the Sonics a new home.

Last spring he proposed a $500 million palace in the suburb of Renton. He asked the state of Washington to authorize King County tax dollars to pay for $278 million of the building. Bennett offered $100 million.

But the Oklahoman stepped into a political climate tired of public handouts for sports stadiums after tax money was used to build Safeco Field for baseball's Mariners and Qwest Field for the NFL's Seahawks. Since those two landmarks rose at the south end of the city's skyline, the Washington Legislature has said no, no and no again.

No last year to a NASCAR track. No this year to the University of Washington's plan for a huge update of Husky Stadium for football. And no last month to an 11th-hour plan led by Ballmer to expand KeyArena, the league's smallest venue.

Ballmer, a basketball fan, was willing to put up some of his Microsoft millions for a $300 million KeyArena expansion that would have used far less tax money -- $75 million to $150 million -- than Bennett's arena.

Six weeks ago, Oklahoma City voters didn't hesitate to approve a sales tax extension to fund $121.6 million in improvements to a downtown arena and build a practice facility. Then Thursday, the Oklahoma House approved a tax incentive package designed to help lure the Sonics that was swiftly signed into law by Gov. Brad Henry.

Meanwhile, Washington Gov. Christine Gregoire and U.S. Senators Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell are asking the NBA to delay its decision amid the groundswell of nostalgia, sadness and anger in Seattle.

"We've had NBA basketball for 41 years," Mayor Nickels said. "This team means something to us."
 
Mar 24, 2006
4,804
476
0
46
#62
I dont want them in Oklahoma either....fuck that!

that makes it more difficult for KC to get a team now.


STAY IN SEATTLE!


i'll take the Grizzlies!
 
Jan 10, 2008
536
0
0
49
#63
This could very well just be a PR move by Howie...we all know he is one of the enemies in this whole fiasco. Maybe he is trying to save face. Why would he spend any more money on lawyers and what not if he sold the team in the first place? Why should he care? He obviously didnt care THAT much if he sold it to a group called "The Oklahoma Professional Basketball Association" or what the fuck Clay is calling his band of lyin cronies.

Ill believe it when i see it.
I agree he's just trying to save face. This will be hard to prove in court anyways.
 
Apr 25, 2002
3,970
15
38
42
#64
This could very well just be a PR move by Howie...we all know he is one of the enemies in this whole fiasco. Maybe he is trying to save face. Why would he spend any more money on lawyers and what not if he sold the team in the first place? Why should he care? He obviously didnt care THAT much if he sold it to a group called "The Oklahoma Professional Basketball Association" or what the fuck Clay is calling his band of lyin cronies.
pffffffffft. Howard Schultz is the faggot ass that got us in this mess in the first place. It's clearly a move to save face and to appear less faggoty in the eyes of the public. PR move.

Bingo, you guys both have it dead on. I'm glad he's doing it, it is just another ugly headline, and the uglier the better for our sake. But regardless of anything, he is a piece of shit.

Hey I think I'll take out a gun and shoot you in the neck, but then call 9-1-1 on my cell for you on my way out. That's what Howard's done here.
 
Apr 25, 2002
3,970
15
38
42
#65
Ive been thinking about this alot lately actually, and as a Warrior fan, i would be angered to see the Sonics leave Seattle, fuck oklahoma, I mean really tho, the sonics have a nice past, and Gary Payton and the rainman Shawn Kemp were some of my favorite players of all time, Fuck Clay Bennett!
Thank you for your support.
 
Jun 13, 2002
13,154
525
113
siccness.net
#66
NBA owners approve the Sonics' relocation

Associated Press

Updated: April 18, 2008, 2:34 PM EST

NBA owners have approved the Seattle SuperSonics' move to Oklahoma City for the 2008-09 season, pending the resolution of litigation between the team and the city of Seattle.

The Sonics could begin playing in owner Clay Bennett's hometown as early as next season if they can get out of the remaining two years of their lease at Key Arena.

Seattle has filed suit trying to force the Sonics to remain in the city until the lease expires in 2010, while Bennett wants to buy out the remainder. The city already has rejected Bennett's $26 million to settle the lease dispute. A trial is set to begin in federal court June 16.

"This team is destined to lose $30 million a year and is prepared to lose it for two more years, if that's what the city insists on exacting," NBA commissioner David Stern said.

Seattle hopes to keep the Sonics in town for what would appear to be two lame duck seasons, to buy time for a group led by Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer to find an arena solution and eventually purchase the team from Bennett to keep them in town.

Ballmer's group already has proposed paying for half of a $300 million expansion of KeyArena, with the other half coming from the city and from county tax revenues.


"We know the longer they are in the Seattle, the better the chance they will stay," Mayor Greg Nickels said Thursday of the Sonics.

"I think if we had a group the caliber of one led by Steve Ballmer and we had an arena pot with $300 million available in it, the NBA would have a hard time abandoning a city that's always had pro basketball — at least for the last 41 years," Nickels said. "They are already awful nomadic with teams like the Hornets and Grizzlies moving," in this decade.

"I think the Ballmer group stepping forward was a game-changer for us," Nickels said.

Bennett is also facing a class-action lawsuit brought by season-ticket holders who say they were duped into buying tickets under the premise the Sonics wouldn't leave.

And this week former team owner Howard Schultz announced plans to sue to get the team back, saying Bennett did not make a good-faith effort to secure a new arena deal as he promised when he bought the team in 2006.

"It really doesn't feel like it's over here yet," Sonics forward Nick Collison, who owns a home up the hill from KeyArena, said before the vote was taken. "There's still a lot of things to do."




Read this article at:
http://msn.foxsports.com/nba/story/8049250/NBA-owners-approve-the-Sonics'-relocation click to print this page


© 2008 Fox Sports Interactive
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,283
113
#67
NBA owners approve the Sonics' relocation

Associated Press

Updated: April 18, 2008, 2:34 PM EST

NBA owners have approved the Seattle SuperSonics' move to Oklahoma City for the 2008-09 season, pending the resolution of litigation between the team and the city of Seattle.

The Sonics could begin playing in owner Clay Bennett's hometown as early as next season if they can get out of the remaining two years of their lease at Key Arena.

Seattle has filed suit trying to force the Sonics to remain in the city until the lease expires in 2010, while Bennett wants to buy out the remainder. The city already has rejected Bennett's $26 million to settle the lease dispute. A trial is set to begin in federal court June 16.

"This team is destined to lose $30 million a year and is prepared to lose it for two more years, if that's what the city insists on exacting," NBA commissioner David Stern said.

Seattle hopes to keep the Sonics in town for what would appear to be two lame duck seasons, to buy time for a group led by Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer to find an arena solution and eventually purchase the team from Bennett to keep them in town.

Ballmer's group already has proposed paying for half of a $300 million expansion of KeyArena, with the other half coming from the city and from county tax revenues.


"We know the longer they are in the Seattle, the better the chance they will stay," Mayor Greg Nickels said Thursday of the Sonics.

"I think if we had a group the caliber of one led by Steve Ballmer and we had an arena pot with $300 million available in it, the NBA would have a hard time abandoning a city that's always had pro basketball — at least for the last 41 years," Nickels said. "They are already awful nomadic with teams like the Hornets and Grizzlies moving," in this decade.

"I think the Ballmer group stepping forward was a game-changer for us," Nickels said.

Bennett is also facing a class-action lawsuit brought by season-ticket holders who say they were duped into buying tickets under the premise the Sonics wouldn't leave.

And this week former team owner Howard Schultz announced plans to sue to get the team back, saying Bennett did not make a good-faith effort to secure a new arena deal as he promised when he bought the team in 2006.

"It really doesn't feel like it's over here yet," Sonics forward Nick Collison, who owns a home up the hill from KeyArena, said before the vote was taken. "There's still a lot of things to do."




Read this article at:
http://msn.foxsports.com/nba/story/8049250/NBA-owners-approve-the-Sonics'-relocation click to print this page


© 2008 Fox Sports Interactive
Only 2 people voted no: Cuban and Allen.

Funny thing is, appearntly, Paul Allen this morning on KJR said that he wasnt gonna vote AT ALL, becuase if anyone said "no", there would be "reprecuassions". Was Stern threatening the owners to move?

Stern is up to some realy shady shit as of late...fuckin piece of shit.
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,283
113
#69
Report: Sonics owner files his own suit

Posted: April 18, 2008
Sporting News staff reports


Seattle SuperSonics owner Clay Bennett has filed a federal-court motion accusing Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels of a "Machiavellian plan" to force Bennett and his fellow owners to sell the team back to Seattle investors led by Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, according to the Seattle Times.

The legal move comes after former Sonics owner Howard Schultz filed a lawsuit against Bennett earlier this week, in an attempt to rescind the 2006 sale of the team to Bennett. In the suit, Schultz accuses Bennett of failing to abide by a promise to make a good-faith effort to keep the team in Seattle.

NBA commissioner David Stern is expected to announce the NBA Board of Governors' decision on the Sonics' relocation to Oklahoma City this afternoon.
 
Jun 27, 2005
5,207
0
0
#70
Well it looks like theyre gone, but didn't you say the name and colors and all that stay with Seattle? Why don't some of these people trying to buy the team just establish an "expansion" team and call em the Sonics? lol
 
May 11, 2002
4,039
12
0
45
#71
Only 2 people voted no: Cuban and Allen.

Funny thing is, appearntly, Paul Allen this morning on KJR said that he wasnt gonna vote AT ALL, becuase if anyone said "no", there would be "reprecuassions". Was Stern threatening the owners to move?

Stern is up to some realy shady shit as of late...fuckin piece of shit.
Im glad Paul Allen voted no, of course he has the power to do so. I mean what is Stern going to do? kick Allen out of the league? Allen has the fincial backing to avoid any reprecuassions that Stern has any power of enforcing.

Fuck Stern.
 
Apr 25, 2002
3,970
15
38
42
#73
Today was just a formality, we didn't learn anything today.

The next step is hoping the city grows a pair and does not accept a settlement leading up to that June trial, that's what I'm afraid of.

I hope this gets uglier and uglier and uglier, that's our only hope.
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,283
113
#74
Well it looks like theyre gone, but didn't you say the name and colors and all that stay with Seattle? Why don't some of these people trying to buy the team just establish an "expansion" team and call em the Sonics? lol
David Stern SWORE that Seattle would NEVER get a team after this. The state legistlator's must have really pissed him off.

However, you cant ignore money. Memphis and even possibly NO will up for sale very soon.
 
Jan 10, 2008
536
0
0
49
#75
David Stern SWORE that Seattle would NEVER get a team after this. The state legistlator's must have really pissed him off.

However, you cant ignore money. Memphis and even possibly NO will up for sale very soon.
I believe that is the only hope. Make them stay for a couple years and lose a shitload of money. Then when another team becomes available maybe Bennet will give up on the Sonics.
 
Apr 25, 2002
3,970
15
38
42
#76
I believe that is the only hope. Make them stay for a couple years and lose a shitload of money. Then when another team becomes available maybe Bennet will give up on the Sonics.
I don't trust the NBA to give Seattle another team, so of course I want to see them stay 2 more years for 2 reasons:

2 more years of the Sonics

and

Yeah, make Bennett bleed, there's no shame in that like Stern tries to make you believe.

I hope he is in attendance at the UW vs. Oklahoma game on September 15, and somebody shoots him.
 
Jan 10, 2008
536
0
0
49
#77
I don't trust the NBA to give Seattle another team, so of course I want to see them stay 2 more years for 2 reasons:

2 more years of the Sonics

and

Yeah, make Bennett bleed, there's no shame in that like Stern tries to make you believe.

I hope he is in attendance at the UW vs. Oklahoma game on September 15, and somebody shoots him.
I agree 100%
 
Apr 25, 2002
3,970
15
38
42
#78
I'm not in town September 15th, maybe you can be the one to do it.

On a slightly less fucked up note, another more innocent idea I have is to simply gather a couple hundred Sonics bumper stickers, and then just hand them out to 4-5 friends, draw lines on a map, and have everybody go out (probably in the middle of the night) and just stamp them all over on every Starbucks in King County.

A little bit of very mild vandalism, it could potentially be a cute little news story, which would be good. Anything to bring attention to Howard, he's fuckwad #1 in this whole fiasco, we mustn't forget that.
 
May 5, 2006
138
28
0
42
#80
I never knew Bennett wanted to move the Spurs to Oklahoma City. The Oklahoma City Spurs? WTF???

How can Schultz not notice the attempt made by Bennett to move the Spurs? Fuckin idiots should of sold it to someone local in Seattle.
If the Spurs stayed in SA, then I doubt the Sonics will move

But Id be mad if someone tried to move the Lakers, thats like taking away part of my fuckin childhood from me. He'd get assassinated quickly.