Deion Branch To Seattle

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
#2
I still dont understand this move....but whatever...welcome Deion....

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2583149

Deion Branch might return as soon as Week 2, but it won't be with the Patriots.

New England traded the disgruntled wide receiver to the Seattle Seahawks for a 2007 first-round draft pick on Monday, ESPN.com's Michael A. Smith has confirmed.

Branch had filed a grievance against the Patriots, contending New England reneged on a verbal promise to trade him if he reached a contract agreement with another team, and that team made a fair trade proposal to the Patriots.

The Seahawks, along with the New York Jets, had fashioned a contract agreement with Branch before the season, agreeing to a six-year, $39 million deal that would have paid him $13 million in combined bonuses and about $23 million in the first three years of the contract. Neither team, however, could satisfy the demands of the Patriots, who were seeking first- and middle-round choices as compensation at the time, and the deadline set by New England passed without a trade.


However, ESPN's Chris Mortensen reported last week that arbitrator John Feerick of Fordham Law School had put his decision on hold.

Wide receiver Darrell Jackson, arguably the Seahawks' best receiver, has twice in the past year undergone surgery to his left knee. After missing 10 games in 2005, his durability has come into question.

Jackson caught five passes for 47 yards for Seattle against Detroit, but the Seahawks struggled on offense in a 9-6 Week 1 victory, failing to score a touchdown.

In addition, tight end Jerramy Stevens will probably miss the first month of the season because of a torn meniscus in his left knee. Stevens is an often-inconsistent pass-catcher, as evidenced in the Super Bowl, but he does provide Seattle with a big presence in the middle of the field. Wide receiver Nate Burleson, signed as a free agent in the spring, is still assimilating the offense, and is more of a deep threat who may not be the best fit in a West Coast-style passing game. Always-reliable wide receiver Bobby Engram, forced to play outside in 2005 because of injuries, is far more effective working out of the slot.

Burleson caught one pass for 36 yards on Sunday, while Engram gained 52 yards on five receptions.

Branch, whose obvious displeasure with his current New England contract has not overshadowed the fact that he is regarded as a solid locker room presence and hard worker, could be the prescription for what ails the Seahawks' passing game right now.
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
#4
We need O-Line help more than anything...cus they looked hurt in that game....

Alexander a product of his line???Guess we'll find out this year and see if im right in sayin he is "highly overrated"...

If Seattle cant run...that takes away ALOT from the offense....we are a BALANCED team...if we become one dimensional...than whats the use???
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#9
Edward Thizzerhands said:
We need O-Line help more than anything...cus they looked hurt in that game....
No doubt, that was the one thing that really concerned me after yesterdays game. Hopefully they'll get it together soon.

With that being said, anytime you can add a player like branch to your offense that is a huge plus.
 
Apr 14, 2003
6,415
154
63
37
#11
Edward Thizzerhands said:
We need O-Line help more than anything...cus they looked hurt in that game....

Alexander a product of his line???Guess we'll find out this year and see if im right in sayin he is "highly overrated"...

If Seattle cant run...that takes away ALOT from the offense....we are a BALANCED team...if we become one dimensional...than whats the use???
Yea yea...I mean come on now, the "best offense in the league" didnt even score a TD yesterday...And Shaun didnt do SHIT. weak ass She-Hawks