it aint the same exact beat tho. not like DANKED OUT stole it from a producers page/site and used it without rights.
so yes, ERG would be the 1 to worry about any type of claim. but VINCE V would also have to put forth decent work to pursue that claim and have a case.
all in all, its not worth dudes time unless DANKED OUT sold over 50k singles of that 1 song.
then it'd be up to a judge if that beat is enough of a copy to earn rights.
I'm not saying Danked Out stole the beat. But he WOULD be the one responsible if Vince V decided to pursue legal action. It's been established that Vince V copyrights his beats. It's also true that ERG's beat is a blatant ripoff. The notes are exactly the same. Vince V would win in court if he filed a claim against whoever used his beat, or a beat that used his underlying work, in a commercial manner without his permission.
Consider a similar situation - Danked Out uses a beat that contains a well known sample and he doesn't clear it. Danked Out releases a commercial album using that beat. Who's responsible if the owner of that sample decides to pursue legal action? The producer or Danked Out? I know a music supervisor at MTV who unknowingly licensed and used a song for a show that contained elements from another song. The song didn't have permission to use those elements and the owners filed a claim. Guess who was responsible? MTV was.
So no, ERG wouldn't have to worry. Danked Out is the one would have to worry if Vince V decided to file a claim. I never touched on whether or not it was worth Vince V's time to file a claim or not - that's up to him. And whether or not 50,000 copies are sold is irrelevant. Danked Out doesn't need to sell 50,000 copies to catch Vince V's attention because Vince V posts right here on the Siccness. Vince V could also issue a cease-and-desist order to Danked Out if he felt like it, and it wouldn't necessarily cost him a dime.