Cryptozoology

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Aug 6, 2006
2,010
0
0
40
#1
Cryptozoology - the search for animals that are rumored to exist, but for which conclusive proof is missing.

Ok, just bored and wanted to make a thread on Cryptozoology.. I encourage you to post up some articles/pictures of hidden animals, yet to be classified scientifically or thought to have been extinct.

I'll start it off with two illusive creatures.

Mokele-mbembe

Mokèlé-mbèmbé is the name given to a large creature reported to live in the lakes and swamps of the Congo River basin. The term "Mokèlé-mbèmbé" comes from the Lingala language, and can be roughly translated as “one who stops the flow of rivers.” (Clark, 261)

The creature's very existence and identification have long been debated between mainstream scientists, local Pygmies, creationists and cryptozoologists. Most controversially, it has been suggested that the creature might be a relict sauropod which somehow survived extinction. This idea has seen very little attention or support from scientists, who tend to argue that the creature can be best explained as some combination of fraud, folklore and misidentification of other animals.
http://www.mokelembembe.com/

ChupaCabra

The chupacabra (or chupacabras) is a cryptid said to inhabit parts of Latin America. It is associated particularly with Puerto Rico (where it was first reported), Mexico, Chile, Brazil and the United States, especially in the latter's Latin American communities and Maine. The name translates literally from the Portuguese and Spanish as "goat sucker". It comes from the creature's reported habit of attacking and drinking the blood of livestock, especially goats. Physical descriptions of the creature vary. Sightings began in Puerto Rico in the early 1990s, and have since been reported as far north as Maine, and as far south as Chile. Though some argue that the chupacabras may be real creatures, mainstream scientists and experts generally contend that the chupacabra is a legendary creature, or a type of urban legend.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chupacabra

Picture:


^Looks like a Deer Dog mixed with 1/3 Wallabee, ugh, lol...
 
Sep 25, 2005
1,148
1,075
0
45
#5
My best friend growing up told me he saw a snake with batlike wings fighting a crow one time. He saw it with one of his other friends when they were 17 or so. He has since passed away, but he always swore to me that it was true. I talked to the other guy who saw it a couple years ago and he swore it was true too.
 
Aug 6, 2006
2,010
0
0
40
#6
|GOD|||ZILLA| said:
HA.. that was your link.. maybe i did somethin' wrong..

retarded kangaroo?
^Hahaha, that still is my link.. I'm trippin though too because I should of noticed that.



taetae said:
My best friend growing up told me he saw a snake with batlike wings fighting a crow one time. He saw it with one of his other friends when they were 17 or so. He has since passed away, but he always swore to me that it was true. I talked to the other guy who saw it a couple years ago and he swore it was true too.
I can believe that shit. There has to be plenty of animals out there that we haven't discovered yet, and they must look weird as hell to the common observer. Snakebat vs. a crow huh? That would of been cool to see.
 
Jan 30, 2007
846
0
0
41
#7
it could have been a Strange Music logo, the Snake and the Bat... :|
but is this like a liger? a mix between a tiger and lion? or loch ness monster? or something big like the thing between my legs?
 
Aug 6, 2006
2,010
0
0
40
#9
The Myakka "Skunk Ape" Photographs
By Loren Coleman

Two remarkable new photographs of what may be a Florida Skunk Ape have been discovered through an interesting chain of events by Sarasota resident and animal welfare specialist David Barkasy. Bigfoot! The True Story of Apes in America overviews how these photographs were taken, how this find surfaced, the first reactions and analyses, and some tentative conclusions. For the time being, certain supportive notes will remain, here, available and online

Here is the December 22, 2000, letter signed "God Bless. I prefer to remain anonymous" mailed to the Sarasota Sheriff's Department.

Newspapers in Florida, the Art Bell show, and other radio programs during mid-February, decided to talk about the Myakka photographs. The hope is that the woman photographer will be identified.

In the meantime, meaningful analyses of the eyeshine, the pupil diameter, the dentition, the tongue, hair color, and exhibited behavior of this apparent primate is taking place.

Link to pictures/article:
http://www.lorencoleman.com/myakka.html
 
Aug 6, 2006
2,010
0
0
40
#11
^^They're trying to say that it looks like an Orangutan, but I don't know. That thing is pretty big and to me, it actually seems slightly more ape-like than an Orangutan is..
 

ThaG

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2005
9,597
1,687
113
#12
ParkBoyz said:
I can believe that shit. There has to be plenty of animals out there that we haven't discovered yet, and they must look weird as hell to the common observer. Snakebat vs. a crow huh? That would of been cool to see.
there might be undiscovered apes and other large animals but they won't be anything radically different from the vertebrates we know now, we definitely won't find a "snakebat"

new animals are dicsovered all the time, including even new phylla, (some examples: Cycliophora (1995), Gnathostomulida (1956), Loricifera (1983), Micrognathozoa (2000), Xenoturbella (1949)) but they are all small
 
May 15, 2002
2,964
8
0
#13
ParkBoyz said:
^^They're trying to say that it looks like an Orangutan, but I don't know. That thing is pretty big and to me, it actually seems slightly more ape-like than an Orangutan is..
It looks more like a giant bonobo to me..if it really "is" anything.

BTW, an Orangutan is an ape.
 
Aug 6, 2006
2,010
0
0
40
#16
^^^Damn, some weird shit on there..

ThaG said:
there might be undiscovered apes and other large animals but they won't be anything radically different from the vertebrates we know now, we definitely won't find a "snakebat"

new animals are dicsovered all the time, including even new phylla, (some examples: Cycliophora (1995), Gnathostomulida (1956), Loricifera (1983), Micrognathozoa (2000), Xenoturbella (1949)) but they are all small
I'm in no way referring to little worms and other Microscopic animals.. I'm talking about complex life forms, such as a species of Mammal, Reptile, Amphibian, large Crustacean, and aquatic vertebrates.. Also bruh, you have no idea what we'd find and how it would look. If you believe in 530 million years of evolution after the "Cambrian explosion", then you especially can't put your self in the arrogant seat to really say that you'd recognize it as anything besides a vertebrate. Other than that, it might simply look weird as hell, because I know if they'd just discovered any Xenarthra like Armadillos or "Anteaters" tomorrow I'd be freaked the fuck out!
http://www.msu.edu/~nixonjos/armadillo/pics/giant_anteater.jpg

^^Doesn't look anything like me, I can say that much..
 
Aug 6, 2006
2,010
0
0
40
#19
Sea serpent? Plesiosaur? Name that Carcass!









"One of our readers, CryptoInformant, sent in a link to a website with photos that may, or may not, be an unexplained marine animal. The title of the page is "Sea Serpent? Plesiosaur?"

One day in June, about 1990, my friend Joanne Rauch and I hiked along the central Oregon coast at Cape Meares. We soon spotted a large object on the beach.

I took the pictures, but I can’t remember which camera I used at the time. I believe it was a Minolta 35mm point and shoot.

I paced the length of the "sea serpent" - 13 paces, approximately 33 feet since my pace at the time was a bit over 2.5 feet.

If the bent leg points to the head, the head was missing as far as I could tell, chewed or screwed off by a propeller, or perhaps rotted away.

Unfortunately, some liquid spilled on some of the pictures and efforts to clean them resulted in minimal damage. When that happened, I stopped my efforts to clean the photos. Somewhere in the house I have the negatives and when I get them, I’ll developed them and make better scans.

I called the Hatfield Marine Science center (Newport, OR) and described what we’d seen. Their best suggestion was that this is a gray whale, despite the tapering neck and tail. One woman suggested the bent flipper might be a grotesque penis. She didn’t see the pictures.

I’ve hiked the wilderness strip of the Olympic Peninsula in Washington, a couple of hundred miles north of Cape Mears, and seen 4 dead gray whales over the years. None looked remotely like this-the grays don’t taper nearly so much at the tail and don’t taper at all at the head. The heads are massive.

What the heck is this thing???"
 

ThaG

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2005
9,597
1,687
113
#20
ParkBoyz said:
^^^Damn, some weird shit on there..



I'm in no way referring to little worms and other Microscopic animals.. I'm talking about complex life forms, such as a species of Mammal, Reptile, Amphibian, large Crustacean, and aquatic vertebrates.. Also bruh, you have no idea what we'd find and how it would look. If you believe in 530 million years of evolution after the "Cambrian explosion", then you especially can't put your self in the arrogant seat to really say that you'd recognize it as anything besides a vertebrate. Other than that, it might simply look weird as hell, because I know if they'd just discovered any Xenarthra like Armadillos or "Anteaters" tomorrow I'd be freaked the fuck out!
http://www.msu.edu/~nixonjos/armadillo/pics/giant_anteater.jpg

^^Doesn't look anything like me, I can say that much..
evolution didn't started with the cambrian explosion, but we have a good reason to think that no new body plans have appeared after vertebrates

before and immediately after the cambrain explosion there were a lot of weird and very different body plans, things like Anomalocaris



but all the major phyla have been around at that time and nothing radically new has appeared after that

there are creatures that were initially legendary and were later discovered (Architheutis for examples) but it is very unlikely that a snake with wings will be ever found