I didn't read through all those posts because that's a bit too meticulous to warrant an online message board.
But as for the "Selling out/Showing up debate"
= The Steelers calculate their attendance and announce it during the 3rd quarter of the game. Their sell-out crowds are based on how many people actually show up to the game. If they 65,000 (the maximum) were in attendence, then it means 65,000 tickets were torn that day.
=We have a 65,000 capacity, but we sell standing room only tickets, so we constantly have way more than that.
=Pittsburgh is as poor, if not poorer, than Cleveland. We have a failing economy. You say its not that easy for a poor team to build a new stadium...but that's exactly what we do.
=We have tens of thousands of people outside the stadiums for games (even when we're 6-10).
So...selling out is the same as showing up here. I don't think that a mere technicality such as "how many tickets sold vs. how many people actually in attendance" is a big enough difference to start a worthwhile argument.
=The TV ratings in the city pretty much all go to the Steelers game. During a steelers game the city is a ghost town. Everybody wears black and gold all day long. Some major channels even blackout during a steeler game.
So those that didn't show up are still watching a game. The question that I pose to you, considering the Browns haven't been a good team in a long time, is how many women between the ages of 13-65 are die hard browns fans in your city? How many of them plan their day around the Browns schedule. In Pittsburgh its probably around 95%.