Comments are addressed in the order they where made.
#1 Take an upper level physics class or if your short on funds go to the library and read up on entropy. BTW allow me to reitorate increasing randomness is positive entropy.
#1' No i am saying that the above stated laws of physics are in direct opposition to the existance of an omnipotent being therefore either the given laws of physics do not exist or said omnipotent being does not exist.
#2 you are not required to and you cannot infact you cannot prove anything based on faith therefore you cannot employ the scientific method based on faith because the scientific method is designed to __________<-add irrational commentary here.
#3 A display of your misunderstanding of the scientific method.
Thank you for your faith btw I hypothesize that you are also not an idiot the evidence for this is embeded in this very thread. You are a practicioner of irrational rehtoric which requires the excellent verbal skills lacking in idiocy. Sadly you seem to lack the requisit conceptual understanding necessary for the pragmatic approach.
#4 Faith is not necessary as there is evidence to support this claim.
#5 Test this hypothesis and record your results publish a scientific paper and be riticuled btw the use of exclimation points is not evidence of emotion only evidence of emphasis.
Satan does exist (satan is an epithet denoting enemy) If i would have said hail lucifer I would have been referring to the immaginary being who's stance sits in direct opposition to your plea for perfect balance in all things -> (Hare Krisna)
#6 refer to 1'
#7 I said that its existance (as you define it) is disproven by laws of physics. There are many interpritations of god yours is disproven.
I can only defend one position at a time.
#8 what concepts am I not willing to accept? what beliefs do I hold?
The last part of your paragraph is just more worthless ontology.
#9 Prove to me that no one cares. Or is that comment based purely on faith?
#1 Take an upper level physics class or if your short on funds go to the library and read up on entropy. BTW allow me to reitorate increasing randomness is positive entropy.
#1' No i am saying that the above stated laws of physics are in direct opposition to the existance of an omnipotent being therefore either the given laws of physics do not exist or said omnipotent being does not exist.
#2 you are not required to and you cannot infact you cannot prove anything based on faith therefore you cannot employ the scientific method based on faith because the scientific method is designed to __________<-add irrational commentary here.
#3 A display of your misunderstanding of the scientific method.
Thank you for your faith btw I hypothesize that you are also not an idiot the evidence for this is embeded in this very thread. You are a practicioner of irrational rehtoric which requires the excellent verbal skills lacking in idiocy. Sadly you seem to lack the requisit conceptual understanding necessary for the pragmatic approach.
#4 Faith is not necessary as there is evidence to support this claim.
#5 Test this hypothesis and record your results publish a scientific paper and be riticuled btw the use of exclimation points is not evidence of emotion only evidence of emphasis.
Satan does exist (satan is an epithet denoting enemy) If i would have said hail lucifer I would have been referring to the immaginary being who's stance sits in direct opposition to your plea for perfect balance in all things -> (Hare Krisna)
#6 refer to 1'
#7 I said that its existance (as you define it) is disproven by laws of physics. There are many interpritations of god yours is disproven.
I can only defend one position at a time.
#8 what concepts am I not willing to accept? what beliefs do I hold?
The last part of your paragraph is just more worthless ontology.
#9 Prove to me that no one cares. Or is that comment based purely on faith?
