BREXIT

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 7, 2013
10,369
14,484
113
33°
www.hoescantstopme.biz
#1
Despite the Vote, the Odds Are Against Britain Leaving the EU

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts

The Brexit vote shows that a majority of the British voters understand that the UK government represents interests other than the interests of the British people. As difficult as the British know it is to hold their own government to account, they understand they have no prospect whatsoever of holding the EU government to account. During their time under the EU, the British have been reminded of historical times when law was the word of the sovereign.

The propagandists who comprise the Western political and media establishments succeeded in keeping the real issues out of public discussion and presenting the leave vote as racism. However, enough of the British people resisted the brainwashing and controlled debate to grasp the real issues: sovereignty, accountable government, financial independence, freedom from involvement in Washington’s wars and conflict with Russia.

The British people should not be so naive as to think that their vote settles the matter. The fight has only begun. Expect:

— The British government to come back to the people and say, look, the EU has given us a better deal. We can now afford to stay in.

— The Fed, ECB, BOJ, and NY hedge funds to pound the pound and to short British stocks in order to convince the British voters that their vote is sinking the economy.

— More emphasis on the vote’s weakening of Europe, leaving all to the mercy of “Russian aggression.”

— Hard to resist bribes (and threats) to prominent members of the leave majority and pressure on such leave leaders as Boris Johnson to be reasonable, concillatory and to maintain good relations with Washington and Europe, and to reach a compromise on remaining in the EU.

— Expect the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) to attribute the loss of British jobs and investment opportunities to the leave vote.

Once you learn to think about how things really are and not as the presstitutes present them,
you will be able to add to the list all by yourself.

Remember, the Irish voted against the EU and pressure was kept on them until they reversed their vote. This is the likely fate of the British.

------

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments.
 
May 7, 2013
10,369
14,484
113
33°
www.hoescantstopme.biz
#2
Brexit and Jewish Oligarchy

By Gilad Atzmon

Yesterday Britain voted to leave the EU. The causes of this result have been known for a while. More than half of the Brits are dismayed by the level of immigration, multiculturalism, lack of job opportunities, global capitalism, evaporation of manufacturing and a housing bubble that leaves most young Brits without the prospect of a decent future.

The Brexit was an outlet for these legitimate frustrations. Yet the problematic symptoms listed above have little to do with the EU or Brussels. Their root cause lies elsewhere.

Immigration and multiculturalism (that is; the ideology designed to suppress expression of chauvinism) are integral to cultural Marxist ideology. Britain, like the rest of the West, has been subject to an invasive and brutal paradigm designed to vitiate the working class. Flooding Britain with immigration was a conscious political act pushed by the Jewish left and the Jewish lobby. This is explainable. Jews have good reason to be fearful of the working classes. Historically, it has been the working classes that turned against the Jews. Breaking society into fragmented and diverse segments is transparently a Jewish left interest. When a society is broken into a manifold of tribes and identities, the Jews become merely one tribe amongst many.

I am an immigrant myself and not an anti immigration campaigner. However, at a certain stage in the early 2000s my eight piece Orient House Ensemble consisted of seven immigrants and one native Brit. We were Israelis, a Palestinian, a Romanian and a Moldovan. At the time our ensemble won every British musical award. We were a favourite of the BBC and the Guardian’s album of the year. We were heroes of multiculturalism and the symbol of a new ‘tolerant’ British society. The British Council sent us around the globe to promote those ideals. This didn’t last long. I quickly grasped the underlying agenda. As those who know me may expect, I didn’t keep my mouth shut.

Yesterday the Brits voted against immigration. But leaving the EU may not be the answer for their plight. Looking into the elements and ideologies that planted pro-immigration policies and multiculturalism may be the ultimate way forward.

The demography of the referendum suggests that it is primarily the British working people who want to leave the EU. In the last four decades they have watched manufacturing dying out. They saw an economic bubble that left many of them impoverished and off the property ladder. But it wasn’t really the EU that caused all of it and leaving the EU may not improve things. Milton Friedman, who taught ‘free market’ philosophy to Margaret Thatcher, never lived in Brussels. Friedman believed in the service economy. He also believed that capitalism wasn’t just a great idea, it was also very good for the Jews. Goldman Sachs, George Soros and others who fecklessly destroy one country after another are also not part of the Brussels Government.The British vote was actually a vote against Goldman Sachs, Soros, Friedman and cultural Marxism, but most of them do not know it yet.

Yesterday the Brits proved, once again, that they are a brave people. They made a decision that they understood could inflict some serious difficulties on their society. Knowing that, they marched into the Brexit with pride and I admire their courage. The Brits voted against immigration, banksters, the global economy, the City and the two parties that have facilitated this disaster for decades. However, the Brits failed to attack the root cause of the problem. Leaving the EU is not going to emancipate them. For Jewish oligarchy, the Brexit is a red alert. ‘Hands off’ would be the most clever strategy. Can they follow this humble advice? I doubt it.

Most British Jews have little to do with it. Liam Fox and Michael Gove who were amongst the leaders of the call to leave, are notorious for being dedicated servants of the Jewish lobbies. The Jewish press was pretty quiet on the Brexit. And crucially, if British Jews had identified that the call to leave the EU was somehow related to Jewish power, Jewish Banking or Jewish Left pro immigration we would have seen the rapid formation of a “Jews for Brexit campaign.” This is what Jews do when they detect dissent to their political power, they immediately form the bodies that control the opposition.

-----------

Gilad Atzmon (Hebrew: גלעד עצמון‎‎; born 9 June 1963) is an Israeli-born British jazz saxophonist, novelist, political activist and writer. Atzmon was born in a secular Jewish family in Tel Aviv, and trained at the Rubin Academy of Music in Jerusalem. He renounced his Israeli citizenship and defines himself as "a British, Hebrew Speaking Palestinian".

 
Last edited:
Jun 21, 2006
744
987
93
40
#5
Kind of discriminating they blame the Jews... The flooding of Britain (and the rest of the eu) with refugees is a direct result of USA starting wars in the Middle East and bombing civilians out of their homes.... Europe gets tired of having to clean up after USA and countries want to control their own borders rather then having some rich white guys in Brussels deceiding how many refugees a country should take in.

That gilad guy sounds like the type of muthafucka that's about to do a suicide bombing on a trainstation or something...
 
Jun 21, 2006
744
987
93
40
#7
Lol u serious?
You use a lot of fancy words, but you don't sound too smart. you do know you can't believe everything that's posted on the Internet, right?

And wtf is a 'historical agenda by Jewish elite' anywayz? Is that something like the illuminati?

I don't want to offend you or nothing, but I would encourage you to get some real education. You might learn something.
 
Apr 16, 2005
9,062
19,410
113
40
#8
rich white guys
?

deceiding how many refugees a country should take in.
Isn't that fair though? Germany has been taken most refugees in. If you are a part of the EU, you also have responsibilities. And England is not gonna have less immigrants because of this. Just a lot more racist fucks...
 
Jun 21, 2006
744
987
93
40
#9
?



Isn't that fair though? Germany has been taken most refugees in. If you are a part of the EU, you also have responsibilities. And England is not gonna have less immigrants because of this. Just a lot more racist fucks...
Actually, there are more racist (anti-minority) opinions in Germany now that they have been taking in so many refugees. The historical agenda of the elite racist movement in Germany hasn't been this big for many years....

I don't see why the brexit would lead to more racists in UK?? Care to explain?

Speaking of being fair: how many refugees from Syria and them other war countries are giving refuge in USA? considering USA plays a major role in starting these wars.....

I guess the world is not a fair place....
 
Jun 21, 2016
894
5,396
0
#10
Kind of discriminating they blame the Jews... The flooding of Britain (and the rest of the eu) with refugees is a direct result of USA starting wars in the Middle East and bombing civilians out of their homes.... Europe gets tired of having to clean up after USA and countries want to control their own borders rather then having some rich white guys in Brussels deceiding how many refugees a country should take in.

That gilad guy sounds like the type of muthafucka that's about to do a suicide bombing on a trainstation or something...
Lol u serious?
You use a lot of fancy words, but you don't sound too smart. you do know you can't believe everything that's posted on the Internet, right?

And wtf is a 'historical agenda by Jewish elite' anywayz? Is that something like the illuminati?

I don't want to offend you or nothing, but I would encourage you to get some real education. You might learn something.
Actually, there are more racist (anti-minority) opinions in Germany now that they have been taking in so many refugees. The historical agenda of the elite racist movement in Germany hasn't been this big for many years....

I don't see why the brexit would lead to more racists in UK?? Care to explain?

Speaking of being fair: how many refugees from Syria and them other war countries are giving refuge in USA? considering USA plays a major role in starting these wars.....

I guess the world is not a fair place....
The zionists control the USA and everybody else.
 
Jun 21, 2016
894
5,396
0
#17
I heard the zionists were the secret organisation to conspire the killing of JFK
Yea, I think those stupid zionists invented sarcasm....
A red herring is something that misleads or distracts from a relevant or important issue.[1] It may be either a logical fallacy or a literary device that leads readers or audiences towards a false conclusion. A red herring might be intentionally used, such as in mystery fiction or as part of rhetorical strategies (e.g. in politics), or it could be inadvertently used during argumentation.
The origin of the expression is not known. Conventional wisdom has long supposed it to be the use of a kipper (a strong-smelling smoked fish) to train hounds to follow a scent, or to divert them from the correct route when hunting; however, modern linguistic research suggests that the term was probably invented in 1807 by English polemicist William Cobbett, referring to one occasion on which he had supposedly used a kipper to divert hounds from chasing a hare, and was never an actual practice of hunters. The phrase was later borrowed to provide a formal name for the logical fallacy and literary device.


Let me know when you are ready for a debate, boyo. I will school you for free.
 
Jun 21, 2006
744
987
93
40
#18
A red herring is something that misleads or distracts from a relevant or important issue.[1] It may be either a logical fallacy or a literary device that leads readers or audiences towards a false conclusion. A red herring might be intentionally used, such as in mystery fiction or as part of rhetorical strategies (e.g. in politics), or it could be inadvertently used during argumentation.
The origin of the expression is not known. Conventional wisdom has long supposed it to be the use of a kipper (a strong-smelling smoked fish) to train hounds to follow a scent, or to divert them from the correct route when hunting; however, modern linguistic research suggests that the term was probably invented in 1807 by English polemicist William Cobbett, referring to one occasion on which he had supposedly used a kipper to divert hounds from chasing a hare, and was never an actual practice of hunters. The phrase was later borrowed to provide a formal name for the logical fallacy and literary device.


Let me know when you are ready for a debate, boyo. I will school you for free.
When you say debate, you mean I will post my opinion and you will respond with "no, the zionists are to blame" without explaining anything, right?

Btw, I like herrings. They are tasty fish!