*BREAKING!!*C-Murder Juror Admits To "Brutal Pressure" To Vote Guilty!

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jan 6, 2006
1,831
332
0
43
#1
looks like may be found INNOCENT of this trial after all... haters hurry up & attack.... FREE C!!! NOT GUILTY!!!!!!!!
"Calliope Click Vol.1" 9/29/09

http://allhiphop.com/stories/news/archive/2009/08/24/21909911.aspx


C-Murder Juror Admits To "Brutal Pressure" To Vote Guilty
Published Monday, August 24, 2009 10:20 PM

By Chris Richburg

“Brutal” pressure to deliver a guilty verdict for No Limit rapper Corey “C-Murder” Miller could possibly work in favor of the recently imprisoned entertainer.

Despite casting the deciding vote twice in Miller’s much publicized murder trial, Mary Jacob now admits that she was not entirely convinced the 38-year rapper was guilty of killing Steve Thomas in the now-closed Platinum Club on Jan. 12, 2002.

According to reports, Thomas, 16, was shot through his heart while being stomped by a group of men during an event at the nightspot. A 10-2 verdict, the minimum required by state law for a second-degree murder conviction, was delivered on August 12 to seal Miller’s fate.

The rapper was sentenced to serve a mandatory life sentence in prison on August 14. Jacob’s decision to change her vote from innocent to guilty came after witnessing the emotional breakdown of a young juror who she felt was pressured by other jurors to side with those who believed Miller was at fault.

"This thing had to come to an end for this girl's health, her sanity," Jacob told The Times-Picayune about the 20-year-old Xavier University student who voted for the rapper's innocence. "I believe what happened to Steve Thomas on the floor of the Platinum Club happened to her verbally. "I was more worried about this little girl than I was about Corey Miller," added Jacobs, who still believes that prosecutors did not prove their case "beyond a reasonable doubt."

"Corey Miller will survive whatever happens to him," she said.

As jurors deliberated over the case, Jacobs noticed the physical toll the situation took on the student. The group was firmly split 9-3 in favor of conviction on their second day of deliberation.

However, the student’s condition ultimately swayed Jacob’s opinion as she chose the quickest way to end the young woman’s ordeal.

"They literally made this 20-year-old girl so violently ill," Jacob said. "She was shaking so bad. She ran into the bathroom. She was throwing her guts up. She couldn't function anymore. That's when I decided, the judge don't want to listen to me, doesn't want to listen to us? I told them, 'You want him to be guilty? He's guilty, now let's get the hell out of here.'''

At this time, no comment was made by Miller's family, his former attorney, Ron Rakosky or the Jefferson Parish district attorney's office on Monday (Aug. 24) regarding the latest on the Miller/Thomas murder case.
 
May 2, 2002
9,580
17
0
43
#5
He killled a 16 year old, correct? I mean, there is video of this, right?

And yall talkin bout Free C-Murder? If hes truly innocent, then yeah, I guess this would be good news. But I think everyone knows hes guilty. Theres video.
Let him fry with all the other murderers and rapists. I'm suppose to fee bad for dude cuz he got caught for shooting a kid?
 
Jan 6, 2006
1,831
332
0
43
#6
He killled a 16 year old, correct? I mean, there is video of this, right?

And yall talkin bout Free C-Murder? If hes truly innocent, then yeah, I guess this would be good news. But I think everyone knows hes guilty. Theres video.
Let him fry with all the other murderers and rapists. I'm suppose to fee bad for dude cuz he got caught for shooting a kid?
FOR ignorant folks like YOU who have not read or followed this case, then YOU WOULD KNOW THAT THE VIDEO FOOTAGE OF HIM SHOOTING AT THE CLUB WAS FOR A DIFFERENT CASE THAT HE IS DOING TIME FOR, NOT FOR THIS CURRENT CASE WHERE HE IS ACCUSED OF KILLING A KID....
C WAS NEVER CAUGHT SHOOTING THIS KID. NO EVIDENCE/BALLISTICS LINKED C TO THE DEATH OF THIS KID. THIS HAS BEEN PROVEN.
FREE C!!!!! INNOCENT!!!!!!!!

Learn how to get your FACTS straight, and pay attention to this trial, because surely you haven't.
 
May 2, 2002
9,580
17
0
43
#8
FOR ignorant folks like YOU who have not read or followed this case, then YOU WOULD KNOW THAT THE VIDEO FOOTAGE OF HIM SHOOTING AT THE CLUB WAS FOR A DIFFERENT CASE THAT HE IS DOING TIME FOR, NOT FOR THIS CURRENT CASE WHERE HE IS ACCUSED OF KILLING A KID....
C WAS NEVER WAS CAUGHT SHOOTING THIS KID. NO EVIDENCE/BALLISTICS LINKED C TO THE DEATH OF THIS KID. THIS HAS BEEN PROVEN.
FREE C!!!!! INNOCENT!!!!!!!!

Learn how to get your FACTS straight, and pay attention to this trial, because surely you haven't.
First of all, calm the fuck down and unclench your sphincter.

Secondly, I really dont care, so no, I havent been following the case. But if hes been found guilty TWICE, Im thinking theres a pretty good chance he did it.

Third, if all that shit has been PROVEN, then I think he would have got let off the hook a while ago.
 
Sep 5, 2008
1,995
27
0
50
#10
yeah free the pussy thats too scared to face a man and has to wait till his back is turned to pull a gun...

FREE THAT MAN lol
 
Jan 6, 2006
1,831
332
0
43
#15
looks like its about to get more serious and better for C with the NAACP jumping in:

http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2009/08/la_naacp_wants_state_supreme_c.html

La. NAACP wants state Supreme Court to intervene in C-Murder case
by The Times-Picayune
Thursday August 27, 2009, 9:59 AM


Corey "C-Murder" MillerThe Louisiana NAACP has asked the state Supreme Court to intervene in the Corey "C-Murder'' Miller case after a juror said she changed her vote to guilty to end what she described as "brutal'' deliberations in a contentious 10-2 decision that sent the rapper to prison for life.

State NAACP President Ernest Johnson asked Chief Justice Catherine D. Kimble in a letter Tuesday for "a full investigation of this entire case, the immediate removal of the trial judge, the appointment of a new judge from outside of the 24th Judicial District to hear all post trial motions, and the immediate release of Mr. Miller from prison pending a review of this entire matter because justice delayed is justice denied.''

Miller was convicted Aug. 11 of second-degree murder in the death of 16-year-old Steve Thomas at a Harvey nightclub in January 2002. The Jefferson Parish jury, which decided his fate, voted 10-2 to convict, after one verdict was ruled by Judge Hans Liljeberg as invalid when one juror wrote that her vote was made under duress. Liljeberg sent the jury back for additional deliberations, which lasted another three hours, before the jury said it had reached a decision. The second vote was 10-2, and Liljeberg ruled that the verdict was valid.

This week, Mary Jacob of Metairie said in an interview that she changed her vote to end the deliberations, which she said had taken a toll on a 20-year-old Xavier University student, who believed Miller was not guilty. Jacob said jurors had verbally attacked the young woman, who had become ill and had vomited during deliberations.
 
Jan 6, 2006
1,831
332
0
43
#16
First of all, calm the fuck down and unclench your sphincter.

Secondly, I really dont care, so no, I havent been following the case. But if hes been found guilty TWICE, Im thinking theres a pretty good chance he did it.

Third, if all that shit has been PROVEN, then I think he would have got let off the hook a while ago.
the first trail was overturned because the DA did not give C's lawyers all the information on the witnesses. Info like who had pior charges and who was given deals by the DA to testify against C. By law, the DA have to turn all that info over to his lawyers.

*Notice how the witness went from 13 people to just 2 people this time, now that C-murder's lawyer had all the info.*

Next thing, there was a guy in jail now in GA, who was free at the time and at the club when this all went down who claims he did the shooting. But, the judge in C-murder case aint let that info be given to the jury.

* this is why the NAACP wants a new judge outside of that area to handle the case, so all the eviedance can be heard by the jury. Under La. law if another person say they did it the state cant go after anybody else unless they can prove the other person is lying. the state aint prove the guy was lying and the judge still aint let the info be heard by the jury*

plus you got the lady saying she changed her vote just to help out another young lady under so much pressure. So In my OPINION he aint get a fair trail either time. if he did it send his ass to jail, if not let the man go. But he do deserve a fair trail.....