Brady Is No Montana!

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Chree

Medicated
Dec 7, 2005
32,404
13,935
113
40
#24
Well actually....... Brady has managed 1 feat that Joe Montana wasnt able to accomplish








































































Lose a Super Bowl...


lol i kid i kid
 
Apr 10, 2006
598
0
0
46
#25
I hope today's SuperBowl quiets all these dumbass comparisons. Brady is not on Montana's level. I don't give a damn if the stats are similar or if Brady almost has as many SuperBowl rings as Joe, he is not the best of all time and he is definately not better than Joe Cool. Montana has never lost the big one. Brady had an opportunity to come back and at least tie the game at the end, but did nothing. Those were the moments that Joe Montana shined.

@ Tony, you tried to say Brady doesn't get rattled.. I said that's because he never gets hit. Well, he got hit today and look what happened. He did nothing. He looked like an average QB. He looked like shit until the drive that ended with the Moss TD, and even on that drive he just threw short passes. He was getting hit, and he got rattled. Montana got hit all the damn time, but he found ways to win in the end.

The debate ends here. The Patriots of 2007 are NOT the best team of all time and Tom Brady is NOT the best QB of all time.


Montana lost the big game in 1991 against the NY Giants in the NFC game with th 49ers going for the 3rd Superbowl in SF and the Giants didn't even score a touchdown, so he HAS lost a big game.
 
Apr 10, 2006
598
0
0
46
#26
The only reason I say this is because the main argument for Brady is his SuperBowl wins. That's really the only thing they can bring up when comparing him to Joe Montana. Brady had EVERYTHING in place this season and couldn't get it done. Montana has NEVER had anything like that happen. All I heard for the past month is shit like "if Brady wins the SuperBowl he will be better than Montana." I never agreed with that, but now that it didn't happen the argument is out the window. The Patriots as a team are great, they are one of the best dynasties of all time, but Brady is NOT the best QB of all time. Sorry. He's not even the best QB currently playing.

I can come with a plethora of reasons as to why Montana is better than Brady, but those arguments have already been made all over the web so I'll leave that out. All I'm saying is today should end this debate, at least until Brady takes his team to two more SuperBowls (and WINS). That 16-0 season was blinding folks.


Montana had the BEST WIDE RECEIVER OF ALL TIME on his side, Brady can't say that.
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#27
Montana lost the big game in 1991 against the NY Giants in the NFC game with th 49ers going for the 3rd Superbowl in SF and the Giants didn't even score a touchdown, so he HAS lost a big game.
I didn't know the NFC CHampionship was as big as the SuperBowl.

The "big game" is the SuperBowl, not the conference championship. Brady has lost conference championships too, who gives a shit?
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#30
Yes, Brady won the Super Bowl 3 times with a cast of rejects at WR, while Montana still had Dwight Clark.
Yet this year he had the best WR corps in the league, and couldn't win it.

There were no "rejects" on the Patriot WR list. They were all formidable. Everyone tries to downlplay the receivers in order to up Tom Brady. Give me a fuckin break. They ran routes, got open and caught the fuckin ball. Clowns always try to act like they sucked ass. Give it a fuckin rest.
 
Nov 1, 2004
2,946
78
48
40
#31
^^^^not at all but u werent hating and u were saying congrats on ur team. i said congrats on ur team's season even though i'm not a dallas fan i just showed respect when it was due which i though you were doing.

it's like u guys are scared of a big bully at school and try to be his friend but once someone finally has there day and takes em out u kick em in the teeth. the pats bullied everyteam and y'all held it in until this and i dont get it.

with the exception of raider fans and the russain

so what your saying is the Pats are kinda like D-Bo from Friday?

edit: i have hated the Pats for years... since 2002 i think it was, as you can guess, im a Raiders fan.. hah
 
Jan 18, 2006
14,367
6,557
113
44
#35
Brady aint gonna be ahead of Peyton when its all said and done, it was the Patriots defense that won them there 3 superbowls, Yes had good drives in those wins but the defense got him in that position, they havent blown anybody out in a Superbowl and when he had his best offensive players this year he managed to only score 14 points when it mattered most
 
Jun 1, 2002
7,358
14
0
45
#36
HE'S CLOSE TO BUT NOT AS GOOD AS MONTANA. IF HE WOULD HAVE PULLED OFF A WIN TODAY HE'D BE MENTIONED WITH THE GREATS LIKE MONTANA AND BRADSHAW. SINCE HE BLEW IT HE'LL HAVE TO WIN ANOTHER SB TO PROVE HE'S IN THE SAME LEAGUE AS THOSE GUYS..
 

CZAR

Sicc OG
Aug 25, 2003
7,269
1,375
0
52
#38
Man Brady only been playin 7 years! He has hella years left! Let the man finish then decide where he ranks! Its a compliment in its own that there is a argument that he is better than Montana!! Most likely when Brady retires he will be considered the greatest of alltime!! I know after 7 years he is way better than Joe was!! So again let the man finish cause he has more shit to do trust me!! And ofcourse whiner fans are gonna say Montana regardless so why do yall argue with them?? Give it a few more years and this discussion will be cookies!! Got Em!!