Best Rotation in Baseball?????????

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jan 5, 2006
13,536
3,427
0
37
#63
all it means is that the guys trying out for a spot on the team for the giants need to step it up.. and the guys making defensive mistakes need to work on it so they don't make those in the regular seaason. WE TALKIN' BOUT PRATICE MAN!
 
Mar 24, 2006
4,804
476
0
46
#64
im just sayin u cant say the royals are better than the giants cause they beat em in spring training...... thats rediculous
They just played 2 games against each other and the Royals beat them down both times. I think its safe to say the Royals were the "better" of the two teams then. Yes, It is only spring training I agree.... but that doesn't mean these games are pointless does it?
 
Mar 24, 2006
4,804
476
0
46
#66
Spring training games ARE indeed...NOT pointless

If they were they wouldn't even bother playing them now would they?

Baseball is like no other sport out there...162 games outside in the dead of summer most of the time, atleast 5 games a week, day after day, city to city. Spring training is indeed needed to prepare the players for the long season. Go ahead and ask any player or coach and they'll tell you the same thing.
 

DubbC415

Mickey Fallon
Sep 10, 2002
22,620
6,984
0
39
Tomato Alley
#68
They just played 2 games against each other and the Royals beat them down both times. I think its safe to say the Royals were the "better" of the two teams then. Yes, It is only spring training I agree.... but that doesn't mean these games are pointless does it?
They are pointless. Spring training games mean nothing. Theyre experimenting, winning is an afterthought. Fuck, i love the royals but if spring training meant anything theyd be a 100 game winner year after year.
 

Chree

Medicated
Dec 7, 2005
32,404
13,935
113
40
#69
we are dealing with arjewtin3 here,hes the jewest of the jews and the biggest crybaby nagger ever
 

Rossibreath

triple og from the sbp
Sep 1, 2005
12,968
15,466
113
50
Menasha
#70
spring games serve a purpose, shake off the rust. other than that 2 see what the youbgsters can do. starters play like 3 innings so no1 givs a shit if they win.
 

WXS STOMP3R

SENIOR GANG MEMBER
Feb 27, 2006
6,313
1,455
113
49
#71
ARGENTINE HIT THE NAIL ON THE HEAD. ANGELS HAVE PROBABLY ONE OF THE MOST SOLID PITCHING STAFFS. AND WITH SHIELDS AND ARREDONDO AS SET UPS AND FUENTES CLOSING. THEY'LL BE IN THE PLAYOFFS AGAIN.



















WHERE THEY'LL DUMP TRUCK AND LOSE TO THE BOSTON RED SOX FOR LIKE THE TENTH YEAR IN A ROW.
 
Sep 5, 2006
402
0
0
41
#73
damn not that much love for boston beckett, dice-k, lester, smoltz after the all star break...hopefully penny and masterson can get it together. yankees should be the most dominant but who knows.
 
Feb 21, 2006
2,181
10
0
41
#74
They just played 2 games against each other and the Royals beat them down both times. I think its safe to say the Royals were the "better" of the two teams then. Yes, It is only spring training I agree.... but that doesn't mean these games are pointless does it?
yes, when your starting pitchers go 2 innings, yes. its fucking tryouts for the youngsters and practice for the vets