AP: Clinton Adviser Probed in Terror Memos

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#1
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=sto...ap_on_re_us/sept__11_berger_probe_2&printer=1
AP: Clinton Adviser Probed in Terror Memos
By JOHN SOLOMON

WASHINGTON - President Clinton (news - web sites)'s national security adviser, Sandy Berger, is the focus of a criminal investigation after admitting he removed highly classified terrorism documents from a secure reading room during preparations for the Sept. 11 commission hearings, The Associated Press has learned.


Berger's home and office were searched earlier this year by FBI (news - web sites) agents armed with warrants. Some drafts of a sensitive after-action report on the Clinton administration's handling of al-Qaida terror threats during the December 1999 millennium celebration are still missing.


Berger and his lawyer said Monday night he knowingly removed handwritten notes he had taken from classified anti-terror documents he reviewed at the National Archives by sticking them in his jacket and pants. He also inadvertently took copies of actual classified documents in a leather portfolio, they said.


"I deeply regret the sloppiness involved, but I had no intention of withholding documents from the commission, and to the contrary, to my knowledge, every document requested by the commission from the Clinton administration was produced," Berger said in a statement to the AP.


Berger served as Clinton's national security adviser for all of the president's second term and most recently has been informally advising Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry (news - web sites). Clinton asked Berger last year to review and select the administration documents that would be turned over to the commission.


The FBI searched Berger's home and office with warrants earlier this year after employees of the National Archives told agents they believed they witnessed Berger put documents into his clothing while reviewing sensitive Clinton administration papers, officials said.


When asked, Berger said he returned some of the classified documents, which he found in his office, and all of the handwritten notes he had taken from the secure room, but said he could not locate two or three copies of the highly classified millennium terror report.


"In the course of reviewing over several days thousands of pages of documents on behalf of the Clinton administration in connection with requests by the Sept. 11 commission, I inadvertently took a few documents from the Archives," Berger said.


"When I was informed by the Archives that there were documents missing, I immediately returned everything I had except for a few document that I apparently had accidentally discarded," he said.


Lanny Breuer, one of Berger's attorneys, said his client has offered to cooperate fully with the investigation but has not been interviewed by the FBI or prosecutors. Berger has been told he is the subject of the investigation, Breuer said.


Government and congressional officials familiar with the investigation, who spoke only on condition of anonymity because the probe involves classified materials, said the investigation remains active and that no decision has been made on whether Berger should face criminal charges.


The officials said the missing documents were highly classified, and included critical assessments about the Clinton administration's handling of the millennium terror threats as well as identification of America's terror vulnerabilities at airports to sea ports.
 
Apr 25, 2002
2,856
0
0
40
www.Tadou.com
#2
Oh, come on now. This is all just an attempt by the Republicans and FNC and Rush Limbaugh and O'Reilly to take heat off of Bush for the [blah blah blah], [whining]. [complaint]. [Complaint]; [exaggeration]. [Rhetorical question]? Yeah right.

{Picture of a dancing penguin}
 
Dec 25, 2003
12,356
218
0
69
#3
Poor, poor tadou. Someone pissed in his shrimp top ramen today.

Relevance of "clinton aide" story: little to none, except for Spy vs. Spy Republicans who want to sock it to the Dems with a CLINTON AIDE investigated for something. SOCK IT TO EM HATCH...A "CLINTON AIDE" investigated...that SURE proves how fucked off left wing ideals are.
 
Jun 18, 2004
2,190
0
0
#4
I don't condone alot of things that the man did, but I look back at clintons terms of presidency, and I see: No war/ a budget surplus/ unemployment at an all time low/ cuts in defense spending/ an end to reganomics...Compared to today I would have to say that clinton was by far a superior pres. to bush.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
43
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#7
Bill Clinton was a piece of shit just like bush.He promised to create a universal health care system, protect workers and the environment from the effects of free trade policies, and defend women's abortion rights. He told his story of personally overcoming poverty and promised to help the average American and blah blah blah. What did he do when in office, none of these.

Instead, Clinton presided over the creation of NAFTA and the WTO, the expansion of the racist "war on drugs," a massive increase in spending on the police, a doubling of the prison population to 2 million, the bombing and sanctions on Iraq which killed 1 million Iraqis, and dismantling welfare. In fact, he initiated many of the policies Bush Jr. is following through on.

Clinton fucked healthcare, and bowed down to the pressure of health insurance companies. In fact, under Clinton the number of Americans without health insurance rose from 35 to 44 million.
 
Jun 18, 2004
2,190
0
0
#8
2-0-Sixx said:
Bill Clinton was a piece of shit just like bush.He promised to create a universal health care system, protect workers and the environment from the effects of free trade policies, and defend women's abortion rights. He told his story of personally overcoming poverty and promised to help the average American. Yet when he left office, he had delivered none of these.

Instead, Clinton presided over the creation of NAFTA and the WTO, the expansion of the racist "war on drugs," a massive increase in spending on the police, a doubling of the prison population to 2 million, the bombing and sanctions on Iraq which killed 1 million Iraqis, and dismantling welfare. In fact, he initiated many of the policies Bush Jr. is following through on.

Clinton fucked healthcare, and bowed down to the pressure of health insurance companies. In fact, under Clinton the number of Americans without health insurance rose from 35 to 44 million.
Wow...I had somewhat of an idea, but I did not know it was to that extent...good lookin out. I guess the current admin. just seems way more blatent to me. Thus my contempt.
 
Apr 25, 2002
2,856
0
0
40
www.Tadou.com
#10
1) I dont eat shrimp top ramen

2) You probably don't even know what top ramen tastes like, you spoiled, rebellious white boy. I bet you never even used food stamps or wore food bank clothes before
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#11
2-0-Sixx said:
Bill Clinton was a piece of shit just like bush.He promised to create a universal health care system, protect workers and the environment from the effects of free trade policies, and defend women's abortion rights. He told his story of personally overcoming poverty and promised to help the average American and blah blah blah. What did he do when in office, none of these.

Instead, Clinton presided over the creation of NAFTA and the WTO, the expansion of the racist "war on drugs," a massive increase in spending on the police, a doubling of the prison population to 2 million, the bombing and sanctions on Iraq which killed 1 million Iraqis, and dismantling welfare. In fact, he initiated many of the policies Bush Jr. is following through on.

Clinton fucked healthcare, and bowed down to the pressure of health insurance companies. In fact, under Clinton the number of Americans without health insurance rose from 35 to 44 million.
you forgot the sudan bombing of the pharmaceutical plant, which had no links to development of bio weapons. The bombing stopped millions from gettings medicine, killings thousands and thousands.
 
Jun 24, 2004
2,268
0
0
37
#13
2-0-Sixx said:
Bill Clinton was a piece of shit just like bush.He promised to create a universal health care system, protect workers and the environment from the effects of free trade policies, and defend women's abortion rights. He told his story of personally overcoming poverty and promised to help the average American and blah blah blah. What did he do when in office, none of these.

Instead, Clinton presided over the creation of NAFTA and the WTO, the expansion of the racist "war on drugs," a massive increase in spending on the police, a doubling of the prison population to 2 million, the bombing and sanctions on Iraq which killed 1 million Iraqis, and dismantling welfare. In fact, he initiated many of the policies Bush Jr. is following through on.

Clinton fucked healthcare, and bowed down to the pressure of health insurance companies. In fact, under Clinton the number of Americans without health insurance rose from 35 to 44 million.



And im sure comminusm would suit us better?
 
Dec 25, 2003
12,356
218
0
69
#14
tadou said:
1) I dont eat shrimp top ramen
I'll believe it when I see it.

2) You probably don't even know what top ramen tastes like, you spoiled, rebellious white boy. I bet you never even used food stamps or wore food bank clothes before
You half right...never used food stamps once. I've worn food bank clothes, and eaten food bank food. To this day my moms still hits up the resource center for bread....even though she denies it. And as for top ramen...I spent last december making spreads...and I grew up on that shit.
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#16
http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/?id=110005380
Berger on the 'Wall'
The election debate behind the documents-in-pants caper.

Wednesday, July 21, 2004 12:01 a.m. EDT

We'll grant that visions of a former National Security Adviser stuffing classified documents down his trousers or socks makes for good copy. But count us more interested in learning what's in the documents themselves than in where on his person Sandy Berger may have put them when he was sneaking them out of the National Archives.

For the evidence suggests that the missing material cuts to the heart of the choice offered in this election: Whether America treats terrorism as a problem of law enforcement or an act of war.

Mr. Berger admits to having deliberately taken handwritten notes he'd made out of the Archives reading room. On the more serious charges involving the removal (and subsequent discarding) of highly classified documents--including drafts of a key, after-action memo Mr. Berger had himself ordered on the U.S. response to al Qaeda threats in the run-up to the Millennium--he maintains he did so "inadvertently."

There's only one way to clear away the political smoke: Release all the drafts of the review Mr. Berger took from the room.

If it's all as innocent as Mr. Berger's friends are saying, there's no reason not to make them public. But there are good reasons for questioning Mr. Berger's dog-ate-my-homework explanation. To begin with, he was not simply preparing for his testimony before the 9/11 Commission. He was the point man for the Clinton Administration, reviewing and selecting the documents to be turned over to the Commission.

Written by Richard Clarke for the NSC, the key document was called the Millennium After-Action Review because it dealt with al Qaeda attacks timed for the eve of the Millennium celebrations. In his own 9/11 testimony, Mr. Berger described these al Qaeda plans as "the most serious threat spike of our time in government." He went on to say that they provoked "sustained attention and rigorous actions" from the Administration that ended up saving lives.

But Attorney General John Ashcroft, who has the advantage of having read the document in question, had a different take. In his own 9/11 testimony in April, Mr. Ashcroft recommended that the Commission "study carefully" the after-action memo. He described it as laying out vulnerabilities and calling for aggressive remedies of the type he and the Bush Administration have been criticized for. Mr. Ashcroft further noted that when he took office, this "highly classified review" was "not among" the items he was briefed on during the transition.

Maybe that is because of the potential for embarrassment at the mentality the memo reveals. Mr. Ashcroft testified that the Justice Department's "surveillance and FISA operations were specifically criticized for their glaring weaknesses." The most glaring, of course, were the restrictions on the sharing of critical information between intelligence and law enforcement--even within the FBI itself. This was the infamous "wall of separation" that Clinton Deputy AG Jamie Gorelick instructed the FBI director should "go beyond what is legally required."

From today's vantage we can see the consequences. Ahmed Ressam was one of the would-be Millennium bombers whom the French had identified to U.S. intelligence agencies as an al Qaeda operative planning to attack America. But the "wall of separation" meant that when an alert U.S. customs officer stopped Ressam as he tried to enter the country from Vancouver, the Justice Department had no idea who he was. This helps illuminate the claim made in the missing memo, according to Mr. Ashcroft's testimony, that our success in stopping these 1999 attacks was a result of sheer "luck."

Assuming Mr. Ashcroft's characterizations under oath are true, it would explain why Mr. Berger's "inadvertent" actions seemed to zero in on the various drafts of this review. Sources tell us that Archives staff noticed documents missing after one of Mr. Berger's visits. After gently raising the issue with him, they were shocked to have him return other documents they hadn't even noticed missing. The result was that the next time Mr. Berger went to the Archives, the documents he was given were all marked.

Mr. Berger attributes the disappearance of this classified information to the kind of "sloppiness" that comes from reviewing "thousands of pages of documents." But it strikes us as amazing that mere sloppiness could account for how Mr. Berger seized on the same memo during two different visits.


We're not interested in rehashing what the Clinton Administration or even Mr. Berger did or didn't do vis-a-vis the al Qaeda threat pre-9/11. Nor are we much interested about Mr. Berger's troubles with the law. What does interest us is what this memo might tell us about how America should respond to terror.

Given Mr. Berger's role (until he resigned yesterday) as a Kerry adviser, surely this is something worth debating. And if the missing memos say what Mr. Ashcroft has hinted they do, we can well understand why Mr. Berger would want to keep them in his trousers during a crucial election year.
 
May 29, 2002
4,310
3
0
40
#18
L Mac-a-docious said:
I don't condone alot of things that the man did, but I look back at clintons terms of presidency, and I see: No war/ a budget surplus/ unemployment at an all time low/ cuts in defense spending/ an end to reganomics...Compared to today I would have to say that clinton was by far a superior pres. to bush.
ok, let explain how what you wrote is complete bullshit:

no war? clinton used the military quite often and was responsible in sending our military into a country which bacame the worst military disaster in our countries history (did you see blackhawk down?)

budget surplus? caused by a pretend employment surplus which put us in the economic problems we have right now. the dot.com era gave a bunch of jobs for companies that had absolutley no income which inevitably caught up with us. most of the money came from possible future gains which never were really possible

low unemplyoment? see above
 
Jun 18, 2004
2,190
0
0
#20
bayGIANTS said:
ok, let explain how what you wrote is complete bullshit:

no war? clinton used the military quite often and was responsible in sending our military into a country which bacame the worst military disaster in our countries history (did you see blackhawk down?)

budget surplus? caused by a pretend employment surplus which put us in the economic problems we have right now. the dot.com era gave a bunch of jobs for companies that had absolutley no income which inevitably caught up with us. most of the money came from possible future gains which never were really possible

low unemplyoment? see above
Attack Clinton all you want...are you defending Bush?