Aliens
- Thread starter Y-S
- Start date
no its not because the only one that can answer your question would be an alien.
so you can either surf your alien websites and come up with your own conclusion, or dont start a new thread with a question like this.
at least have some link or paragraph with related thought provoking info.
all of our 2 cents will be nothing more than some uneducated guesses.
so you can either surf your alien websites and come up with your own conclusion, or dont start a new thread with a question like this.
at least have some link or paragraph with related thought provoking info.
all of our 2 cents will be nothing more than some uneducated guesses.
http://serpo.org/intro.asp
http://serpo.org/Serpo_releases_with_commentary.pdf
^^Very interesting stuff here, if you believe in Aliens (and that we've had contact with them) maybe this guy's postings can answer a lot of your questions. He claims to have been an ex government official and goes by "Anonymous", allowing himself to be subjected to open questioning, the PDF link follows the conversations.
The purpose of this site
This site is not authored by anyone with direct access to confidential information. Rather, its purpose is to present to the public information that has been released, and to examine that information in a clear, balanced and intelligent light.
The background of the information
The information began to be released on 2 November 2005 by a retired senior official within the US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) who calls himself "Anonymous". Until he chooses to make his name known, this is the way he will be represented here. Anonymous reports that he is not acting individually and is part of a group of six DIA personnel working together as an alliance: three current and three former employees. He is their chief spokesman.
Up to and including 21 December, the information was released in installments on a private UFO e-mail list moderated by Victor Martinez. The list at that time contained about a hundred and fifty people, including many extremely well-known names in UFO research and related or leading edge scientific fields. Until permissions are granted, their names will be withheld out of courtesy and to respect confidentiality.
Those on the list have differing views regarding the veracity of Anonymous’ claims. However, the pedigree of the list as a whole is important to emphasize. There has been a substantial amount of intelligent discussion about the revelations, and it is important to state that there are many senior people in the US Intelligence and Military community who are taking this information very seriously. It may now be time to release this information to a wider audience, in close approximation to the format in which it was originally made available.
After 21 December, there was a long gap in the postings and many concluded that Anonymous had gone to ground or stopped his disclosures completely. There was no communication from him of any kind. Finally, on 24 January, information was received by Bill Ryan, the author of this website, which was not initially sent to Victor Martinez. Subsequent information was also received by Bill Ryan and posted to this website accordingly.
When sending information to Victor Martinez, Anonymous wrote 85% of the material; another 13% came from another source directly connected with the project; and the final 1-2% came from a "ghost," who canceled his e-mail account as soon as he sent his information. It is not yet known whether this pattern will continue.
The contents of this site
1) Information released by Anonymous , exactly as originally posted. Some comments in [square brackets] were added by the moderator, Victor Martinez, and have been retained. One or two further comments, where clarification is helpful, have been added by this author. Uncorrected typos have also been retained. Martinez, however, corrected many typos and grammatical errors before posting, and states that he has done some "cutting and pasting" of the information supplied directly to him by Anonymous and the other sources; therefore the information is not exactly as originally written. Whenever more information becomes available, this section is fully updated. Nothing is omitted.
2) Comments on this information by others on the list. These have been edited and abbreviated, and at the time of writing are anonymous on this website unless permission to name the correspondent has been given. The purpose of these comments is to prompt independent thought. There is no purpose to highlight the views of any individual. This site is about data, not personalities.
3) Questions and answers . Some questions are presented which may not yet have full answers. As answers (or more questions) present themselves, this section will also be updated.
4) Consistencies : Circumstantial reasons why the released information may be true. Not proof, but reasons to support the account which some may consider to be compelling.
Logically there are four possibilities:
1) Anonymous is a prankster and the reported data is either all invented or culled from other sources and added to a wild novelistic story.
2) Anonymous is operating to a planned agenda and the information is deliberately distorted, but contains a core of extraordinary truth.
3) Anonymous is doing his best to report data from an indirect source (personal notes, his own short or long term memory, or another person), but accidental errors, omissions and additions have occurred.
4) Anonymous is reporting everything faithfully and accurately as best as he can present it.
Only possibility (1) means everything should be rejected. The other three necessarily mean that the reports deserve close attention.
http://serpo.org/Serpo_releases_with_commentary.pdf
^^Very interesting stuff here, if you believe in Aliens (and that we've had contact with them) maybe this guy's postings can answer a lot of your questions. He claims to have been an ex government official and goes by "Anonymous", allowing himself to be subjected to open questioning, the PDF link follows the conversations.
The purpose of this site
This site is not authored by anyone with direct access to confidential information. Rather, its purpose is to present to the public information that has been released, and to examine that information in a clear, balanced and intelligent light.
The background of the information
The information began to be released on 2 November 2005 by a retired senior official within the US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) who calls himself "Anonymous". Until he chooses to make his name known, this is the way he will be represented here. Anonymous reports that he is not acting individually and is part of a group of six DIA personnel working together as an alliance: three current and three former employees. He is their chief spokesman.
Up to and including 21 December, the information was released in installments on a private UFO e-mail list moderated by Victor Martinez. The list at that time contained about a hundred and fifty people, including many extremely well-known names in UFO research and related or leading edge scientific fields. Until permissions are granted, their names will be withheld out of courtesy and to respect confidentiality.
Those on the list have differing views regarding the veracity of Anonymous’ claims. However, the pedigree of the list as a whole is important to emphasize. There has been a substantial amount of intelligent discussion about the revelations, and it is important to state that there are many senior people in the US Intelligence and Military community who are taking this information very seriously. It may now be time to release this information to a wider audience, in close approximation to the format in which it was originally made available.
After 21 December, there was a long gap in the postings and many concluded that Anonymous had gone to ground or stopped his disclosures completely. There was no communication from him of any kind. Finally, on 24 January, information was received by Bill Ryan, the author of this website, which was not initially sent to Victor Martinez. Subsequent information was also received by Bill Ryan and posted to this website accordingly.
When sending information to Victor Martinez, Anonymous wrote 85% of the material; another 13% came from another source directly connected with the project; and the final 1-2% came from a "ghost," who canceled his e-mail account as soon as he sent his information. It is not yet known whether this pattern will continue.
The contents of this site
1) Information released by Anonymous , exactly as originally posted. Some comments in [square brackets] were added by the moderator, Victor Martinez, and have been retained. One or two further comments, where clarification is helpful, have been added by this author. Uncorrected typos have also been retained. Martinez, however, corrected many typos and grammatical errors before posting, and states that he has done some "cutting and pasting" of the information supplied directly to him by Anonymous and the other sources; therefore the information is not exactly as originally written. Whenever more information becomes available, this section is fully updated. Nothing is omitted.
2) Comments on this information by others on the list. These have been edited and abbreviated, and at the time of writing are anonymous on this website unless permission to name the correspondent has been given. The purpose of these comments is to prompt independent thought. There is no purpose to highlight the views of any individual. This site is about data, not personalities.
3) Questions and answers . Some questions are presented which may not yet have full answers. As answers (or more questions) present themselves, this section will also be updated.
4) Consistencies : Circumstantial reasons why the released information may be true. Not proof, but reasons to support the account which some may consider to be compelling.
Logically there are four possibilities:
1) Anonymous is a prankster and the reported data is either all invented or culled from other sources and added to a wild novelistic story.
2) Anonymous is operating to a planned agenda and the information is deliberately distorted, but contains a core of extraordinary truth.
3) Anonymous is doing his best to report data from an indirect source (personal notes, his own short or long term memory, or another person), but accidental errors, omissions and additions have occurred.
4) Anonymous is reporting everything faithfully and accurately as best as he can present it.
Only possibility (1) means everything should be rejected. The other three necessarily mean that the reports deserve close attention.
I don't think there is a way to stop ageing short of transferring your consciousness to a non-biological host (in which case, are you still actually alive?). If you live, you age - simple as that. The act of living always leads to death from old age, making the concept of eternal life utterly implausible.
If you ask me whether I believe there are aliens who regularly visit us, I don't know, maybe the asnwer is no
If you ask me whether there is life on other planets in the universe, I think this is 99.9999% sure, based on simple probabilistic calculations. And since our own planet is just 4.5 billions year old compared to the 13.7 By-old universe it is very likely that life and inteligence on at least some of these planets has reached just as or much more advanced stage as we have.
If you ask me whether there is life on other planets in the universe, I think this is 99.9999% sure, based on simple probabilistic calculations. And since our own planet is just 4.5 billions year old compared to the 13.7 By-old universe it is very likely that life and inteligence on at least some of these planets has reached just as or much more advanced stage as we have.
