Between the guys we have been rumored to be looking at (Charles, AP, Lacy) I think I wanted Lacy the most out of the 3.
I think that the expectations for AP would just be way too high for a 32 year old coming off injury and everyone would expect him to ballout like 2012 and would get pissed and cause a bunch of drama when he did not (like Jimmy Graham x 2).
Charles just seems to be overcome with injuries and Lacy at 26 still has a lot of potential upside.
Lacy - Rawls - Prosise is a solid backfield IMO.
I think that the expectations for AP would just be way too high for a 32 year old coming off injury and everyone would expect him to ballout like 2012 and would get pissed and cause a bunch of drama when he did not (like Jimmy Graham x 2).
Charles just seems to be overcome with injuries and Lacy at 26 still has a lot of potential upside.
Lacy - Rawls - Prosise is a solid backfield IMO.
What's crazy is Lacy was selected as the 61st overall pick of the 2013 draft by the Packers. Seahawks selected Christine Michael 62nd. The word is Seahawks wanted Lacy as a replacement for Lynch but had to take Michael instead.
Michael is still with the Packers so it's essentially like we swapped our second round picks.
Packers got rid of Lacy because the money they would have paid him didn't make sense since the entire offense goes through Rogers. Whereas here Pete still wants to be a run first team. So the move makes sense for both teams even though the Packers lose talent. Plus they just signed Martellus Bennett from the Patriots, and paying him over $21 million for three years or something like that.