Niner News Thread

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

CNI

Sicc OG
Aug 8, 2007
662
0
0
49
Morgan quickly emerging as 49ers' go-to receiving target

SANTA CLARA, Calif. -- Josh Morgan is breaking out from the San Francisco 49ers' logjam at wide receiver.

The second-year pro continues to build on his promising rookie season and a standout spring. Now he's challenging not only for a starting position but also to be the 49ers' No. 1 passing target.

The 49ers haven't had a legitimate No. 1 receiver since Terrell Owens left after the 2003 season. Isaac Bruce has been the closest thing to it since then, leading the team with 61 receptions for 835 yards and seven touchdowns last season.

Bruce is back with the 49ers this year for his 16th NFL season and again figures to play a prominent role. But the team is grooming Morgan to make a bigger impact, particularly with first-round draft pick Michael Crabtree still unsigned and not yet in training camp.

The 49ers also have veterans Arnaz Battle, Jason Hill and Dominique Zeigler on the roster -- that trio combined for 59 receptions last year -- giving the team seven legitimate receivers competing in camp.

But Morgan is quickly emerging as a front-runner. One of the team's stars of spring workouts, Morgan has carried that over to the summer and has been shining on a daily basis in camp.

"For a big-bodied guy his size, for a big receiver, he has excellent explosion," new 49ers offensive coordinator Jimmy Raye said. "He doesn't look like he would have that kind of explosion, but he's an explosive guy and a great leaper. His circumference range, because of his arms, is very good. He can get to some balls with extension that some guys can't. So his progress has been good, and he's doing a good job."

The 219-pound Morgan's combination of size, strength, speed and sticky hands was on display Sunday when he hauled in a deep pass from quarterback Alex Smith. Morgan got behind safety Dashon Goldson, who interfered with him as the ball arrived. But Morgan still was able to make the grab with one hand, then used his thick legs to break Goldson's tackle attempt and streak away for a touchdown.

It's the kind of thing that Morgan has been doing since he arrived in San Francisco last year as an unheralded sixth-round draft pick from Virginia Tech. Morgan broke into the 49ers' starting lineup during the exhibition season and quickly established himself as a playmaker before a staph infection and groin tear limited his playing time and forced him to miss four games.

Morgan averaged 16.0 yards on his 20 receptions, and each of his three touchdown catches went for 30 yards or longer. He made several of San Francisco's most spectacular catches.
 

CNI

Sicc OG
Aug 8, 2007
662
0
0
49
Super, ESPN is reporting Crabtree is prepared to sit out the season.
He sits out this year, he`s retarded. Won`t get any better $$$ next year than what he can get right now.

Someone please get this dude a copy of Too $horts: Gettin It.

"Now let me holler at ya partner, spit this game
in you ear for a minute, quit complaining
Bout how you can't spend it cause you ain't got it
You got what it takes but not enough to get started"


 
Aug 7, 2003
6,046
1
0
I was biased that draft. Let me clear that statement up right now. I`m a Cal Bears fan sir, so I was saying Rodgers from the gate.

What do you say is the reason he fell to 23?

GB was blessed that draft with Rodgers as the 49ers were with Crabtree at 10. Yes, he didn`t fall as far, but it happens all the time.

Prime example:Michael Oher #23 Ravens
He was slated as a top 5 pick.

Interested to hear your theory.
michael oher was never considered a top 5 pick. many mocks had him at 49ers at 10 and were saying that was a reach for the 49ers there. the only reason he would go there at that pick was if all the o-line men for already gone so they niners would reach for him to get a oline man.

there is no theory for rodgers he fell to 23 becuase 22 other teams didnt feel he was good enough to take. doesnt mean hes bad or whatever just not as good as everyone thought.

now imagine the 49ers taking rodgers and him starting his first year with that garbage ass team the 49ers had at the point. 4 different offensive coordinators in 4 years, weak oline/wr's, etc. put anyone in that situation that alex smith was in and i doubt many succeed.
 

CNI

Sicc OG
Aug 8, 2007
662
0
0
49
now imagine the 49ers taking rodgers and him starting his first year with that garbage ass team the 49ers had at the point. 4 different offensive coordinators in 4 years, weak oline/wr's, etc. put anyone in that situation that alex smith was in and i doubt many succeed.
If you go back a few posts, you`ll see I said basically the same thing about Smith. His hs coach and Urban Meyer both said coming out that Smith has a wide learning curve, but once he gets it, he gets it. Have 4 new OC doesn`t help someone like that with new shit to learn year in and year out. Norv Turner was his best tutor of the game, and should he have stayed, this very well could be a totally different convo all together about Smith. The jury isn`t out for me on the kid, although I stand pat with saying they should have grabbed Rodgers anyway.

But, in an ideal situation, if the 49ers had time to groom either one of these QB`s, Rodgers was in a nfl style offense in college, and had good stats. QB`s coming from the spread in college haven`t equaled being good QB`s in the nfl. That equation equals Rodgers being the better pick, regardless of where he actually ended up at 23.

That same argument in draft order should also mean Brady is garbage, Rice is garbage, ect, ect. That`s all I`m saying. Teams get gems in all rounds of the draft sometimes.
 
May 15, 2002
5,879
8
0
49
i think you forgot alex smith went undefeated in his final year and threw almost 50 td's. something rodgers never did.
Akex smith was a system qb. Urban meyers offense made him look good and there was no way he was going to run an option like offense in the NFL.

Rodgers rep got hurt from people saying tedford was a system type offense. They cited such failures as akili smith and joey harrington as proof but it was preety much bullshit.
 

CNI

Sicc OG
Aug 8, 2007
662
0
0
49
i think you forgot alex smith went undefeated in his final year and threw almost 50 td's. something rodgers never did.
But you keep ignoring that he came from a spread offense in college, which has not translated into a good pro. This argument has become pretty much common knowledge in the nfl sports world.
(That year for him in college is what I hold out hope for, but I`m also not holding my breath knowing the system he came from in college.)

This was also a main reason Tebow has returned to Florida for another year, and the OC is implementing new schemes to help prove Tebow`s worth in the nfl at the QB position. There has been major discussions about his draft stock, what actual position would he play in the nfl, since no one from the nfl has ever considered him as a pro QB.

BTW, Tebow plays for the same Urban Meyer that Smith did, in the same spread offense. Tebow is a Heisman winner and a college national champion, but still wasn`t slated to go in the 1st round.

Another Example: Graham Harrell. Groomed since a kid to be a pro QB, he put up astounding stats in the "spread" offense. His stats last year are similar to those of Smith his last yr at Utah.

11-1 Record
5,111 yds
45 Td`s

NEVER DRAFTED but was slated as a possible 1st or 2nd rounder early on. He`s now in the CFL.