Wikileaks wins again. Loser? = Obama

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
LONDON

LONDON

Sicc OG
#201
Aug 5, 2009
1,094
37
48
46
#201
LONDON said:
if you had read my post properly you would have known that i broke down already that he was drunk and could have been making it all up, i never said i took his shit for gospel, i was just adding that it was interesting that i had heard some crazy shit which was in relation to this proven crazy shit thats been posted from the national mainstream western media via wikileaks, read the post before you type nerd
Click to expand...
it turns out that idiot on the bus talking about how when us soldiers get killed or injured in roadside bombs they then go kill everything in that area, village or whatever, kids, woman whoever is moving, it turns out like he was telling the truth

because i saw on a news channel over here in the uk called rt news on sattelite(cable) tv last night exposing the fact through a trial that went on in the us three years ago about these type of killings, to the point were, they even had two whistle blowers that were involved in these type of operations from the US army, exposing the fact that it was US army policy to kill 'everyone' no matter what age, but to kill everyone in the vicinity or nearest village if one of there soldiers gets killed or injured in a roadside bombing and that its was a general practice

so that drunk on the bus was making it up, no he wasn't, research this stuff on the web for further proof if no on here believes it
 
Sydal

Sydal

Sicc OG
#204
Apr 25, 2002
7,232
170
63
43
www.idealsentertainment.com
#204
bay2mi said:
which was never the argument.



lol
Click to expand...
You forgot to quote what you can't argue with, dipshit.

Sydal said:
I've been saying the same shit the entire time, you're just too stupid to understand it. Can you not fuckin' read? And I didn't say I had a perfect college GPA, go read that line again. Proof that you can't read.

Let me put it for you another way, maybe you will understand. A business spends $1 Million. Their business plans include more spending, let's say $4 Million. That business can't spend that $5 Million because it is already spoken for...even if the $4 Million check has not been written yet. That amount is written in and it's as good as gone. Obama has spent $2.6 Trillion, with an additional $6.7 Trillion on its way. Now, even though that is over the next 9 years or so, that money is already going out the door...which means he has, in fact, SPENT more than Bush (in 20 months). Just because that number has not been added to the debt yet (it will finalize when it's all paid out), doesn't mean that debt does not exist.

In another, more understandable term for the average joe...If I buy a house, I'm in debt $550K...even though I haven't paid that money out yet, and won't spend the entire amount for 30 YEARS, I'm still in debt $550K...even though my debt sheet does not say $550K...it says something like $1200/mo. after the down and all that good shit.

It took Bush 2 years to spend $2 Trillion...it took Obama 461 days to spend the same amount. Obama spent more in one day than Bush did in 1 year (2007). And his current spending has $9.3 Trillion going out the door in the next 9 years. The government will not add that amount to the debt until it's spent in it's entirety....but the debt is still there...just like my mortgage.
Click to expand...
ALL DONE IN THE LAST 20 MONTHS! SO I was wrong...it wasn't a YEAR, it was a little over a YEAR AND A HALF! Big fuckin' difference.

If you like the facts so much, why do you quote one line from me and ignore the rest of the FACTS? Because you, like MANY of the people in this country, will only use what supports your argument....even if it's been shut down. You're more focused on the fact that I said ONE YEAR and arguing with that. And I've said it numerous times, it wasn't a year, it was 20 months...so sue me.

The simple fact is, in the less than 2 years he has been in Office, Obama has spewed out more $$ than Bush did in 8 years. That is a fact, and if you don't know how debt works, go to school. Just because it's not on his score card YET, doesn't mean the debt is not there.

I bet if somebody told you they did something in an hour, and it took an hour and 15 minutes, you're one of the people that would argue with that all day...even if they were just rounding out the number.
 
Sydal

Sydal

Sicc OG
#205
Apr 25, 2002
7,232
170
63
43
www.idealsentertainment.com
#205
bay2mi said:
I didn't make that comparison, did I? I only pointed out the typical asinine stuff Sydal likes to post to back up my original comment about him.
Click to expand...
That I'm "stupid". Stupid people are incapable of making decisions that will put them in positions like the one I've put myself in. If you disagree with me you disagree with me, but there was never really any reason for you to attack my intelligence. You don't know me like that, dude...and if you did, "stupid" wouldn't be a word you'd use to describe me.

And again, what have you accomplished in your life?
 
Ne Obliviscaris

Ne Obliviscaris

RIP Cut-Throat and SoCo
#219
Dec 30, 2004
4,161
20,236
0
47
#219
This thread actually had potential, there are very solid arguments for both basically uniform protection for whistle blowers (the dude that leaked that stuff has been in the brig for a few months, and also for the government to be able to protect operationally sensitive material. It came out today that there is actually quite a but of identifying information for afghans cooperating with the military in the documents, and those cats are FUCKED.

Unfortunately, this is the siccness and we have 14 year old faggots who watch too much fox news and turn every even peripherally political discussion into demonstrations of how credulous they are when conservative pundits speak.

Timm, take your faggot ass back to the glen beck fan club and leave us grownups alone. Faggot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom