Wikileaks wins again. Loser? = Obama

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
bay2mi

bay2mi

Sicc OG
#141
Sep 5, 2008
1,995
27
0
50
#141
Sydal said:
If you've ever read any of my "political" posts, you would know I didn't like Bush, either...and that I am, in fact, an independent.
Click to expand...
you can claim you're independent all you want, yet you only pop up in political threads trying to stop the gang-bang on republicans.

and I don't need an article Timm Sr., I have this:

http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=np

that's right, you can dial it right down to the day.
 
Sydal

Sydal

Sicc OG
#143
Apr 25, 2002
7,232
170
63
43
www.idealsentertainment.com
#143
bay2mi said:
That's the problem with you Timm Sr, you actually think I give a fuck about either party. Which further shows your true colors.


I'm going to post one thing, and one thing only




Republican facts:

2.6trillion > 4.9 trillion.
Click to expand...
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Obamas-trillions-dwarf-Bushs-dangerous-spending.html

http://online.wsj.com/article/NA_WSJ_PUB:SB10001424052748704320104575015072822042394.html

http://bsimmons.wordpress.com/2010/05/15/a-real-eye-opener-bush-debt-vs-obama-debt/

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aYgo3fufKIbI

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2010/feb/01/obama-budget-2011-deficit-spending-department

Do I need any more references?
 
Sydal

Sydal

Sicc OG
#144
Apr 25, 2002
7,232
170
63
43
www.idealsentertainment.com
#144
bay2mi said:
you can claim you're independent all you want, yet you only pop up in political threads trying to stop the gang-bang on republicans.

and I don't need an article Timm Sr., I have this:

http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=np

that's right, you can dial it right down to the day.
Click to expand...
So let me get this right. Bush went up about $5 Trillion in the national debt in 8 years. Obama is going after $3 Trillion in less than 2 years. How is that better?

And I haven't been defending ANY republicans OR democrats in any post. I've bashed Bush plenty of times. Yet you refuse to go back and read those posts...you pick the ones that support your little argument (or lack thereof).

And you still haven't responded to my post regarding my "stupidity". What has your wonderful brain helped you achieve in your time on this planet?
 
bay2mi

bay2mi

Sicc OG
#145
Sep 5, 2008
1,995
27
0
50
#145
Sydal said:
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Obamas-trillions-dwarf-Bushs-dangerous-spending.html

http://online.wsj.com/article/NA_WSJ_PUB:SB10001424052748704320104575015072822042394.html

http://bsimmons.wordpress.com/2010/05/15/a-real-eye-opener-bush-debt-vs-obama-debt/

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aYgo3fufKIbI

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2010/feb/01/obama-budget-2011-deficit-spending-department

Do I need any more references?
Click to expand...
References proving my point Timm Sr.?? Seriously?? Let me quote you again

The current administration has put us more into debt in ONE YEAR than Bush did in 8.
Click to expand...
Your own "references" prove this is a crock of shit, and yet you carry on.

Which brings me back to why I stopped reading your posts... because you're a typical neocon who won't even concede when its been proven what he said is a crock of shit.

but you baited me back. props. :knockout:
 
Sydal

Sydal

Sicc OG
#146
Apr 25, 2002
7,232
170
63
43
www.idealsentertainment.com
#146
He ALMOST matched the debt over the last 18 months. Remember, over $4 Trillion in debt over the next six years...you have to count that, junior. So by the end of this next year, he most likely will have DOUBLED Bush's debt in the same time frame.
 
bay2mi

bay2mi

Sicc OG
#147
Sep 5, 2008
1,995
27
0
50
#147
Sydal said:
He ALMOST matched the debt over the last 18 months. Remember, over $4 Trillion in debt over the next six years...you have to count that, junior.
Click to expand...
^^ lol at you, typical republican - when his argument is discounted with facts - he changes the entire thing.

Are you really this stupid?

Now you should understand why I don't read your posts, but your intelligence won't allow it.
 
Timm

Timm

Banned
#148
Sep 16, 2008
5,632
7
0
105
#148
bay2mi said:
^^ lol at you, typical republican - when his argument is discounted with facts - he changes the entire thing.

Are you really this stupid?

Now you should understand why I don't read your posts, but your intelligence won't allow it.
Click to expand...
uh he used facts,

obama has a much higher year per debt ratio
 
Sydal

Sydal

Sicc OG
#149
Apr 25, 2002
7,232
170
63
43
www.idealsentertainment.com
#149
bay2mi said:
^^ lol at you, typical republican - when his argument is discounted with facts - he changes the entire thing.

Are you really this stupid?

Now you should understand why I don't read your posts, but your intelligence won't allow it.
Click to expand...
Alright dude, say what you will. The numbers don't lie, and you obviously don't understand mathematics, projections, and current spending trends on behalf of the Obama Administration. I exaggerated a little...So it's not ONE year...it's 20 MONTHS!

"Typical Republican"...Your best argument yet.

Funny thing is, I was about to get off my ass and vote for Obama until his real plans came to light.

AGAIN, Obama has one of the WORST PRESIDENTIAL APPROVAL RATINGS IN UNITED STATES HISTORY! Disliking his administration is not a partisan issue. Dems, Repubs, Independents alike are ALL tired of his shit...ALREADY! So come with something other than the "Republican" argument...you're making yourself look like an idiot with the same argument in each thread.

And Remember, you have to take into account that Bush SPENT when the Economy was UP! Obama is spending at a faster rate when the Economy is in one of the biggest shitholes in recent history. Those facts matter when doing a comparison like this. But I wouldn't expect your brain to absorb all of that at once. We'll tackle one issue at a time, k junior?
 
Timm

Timm

Banned
#150
Sep 16, 2008
5,632
7
0
105
#150
Sydal said:
Alright dude, say what you will. The numbers don't lie, and you obviously don't understand mathematics, projections, and current spending trends on behalf of the Obama Administration. I exaggerated a little...So it's not ONE year...it's 20 MONTHS!

"Typical Republican"...Your best argument yet.

Funny thing is, I was about to get off my ass and vote for Obama until his real plans came to light.

AGAIN, Obama has one of the WORST PRESIDENTIAL APPROVAL RATINGS IN UNITED STATES HISTORY! Disliking his administration is not a partisan issue. Dems, Repubs, Independents alike are ALL tired of his shit...ALREADY! So come with something other than the "Republican" argument...you're making yourself look like an idiot with the same argument in each thread.

And Remember, you have to take into account that Bush SPENT when the Economy was UP! Obama is spending at a faster rate when the Economy is one of the biggest shitholes in recent history.
Click to expand...
typical republican :D
 
Timm

Timm

Banned
#151
Sep 16, 2008
5,632
7
0
105
#151
bay2mi said:
^^ lol at you, typical republican - when his argument is discounted with facts - he changes the entire thing.

Are you really this stupid?

Now you should understand why I don't read your posts, but your intelligence won't allow it.
Click to expand...
you proved yourself wrong in your own post mayne by posting that debt, it showed how much it rose in so little time when obama was in office, a much higher rate than the bush statistic
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom