why dont we help Africa????

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Dec 8, 2005
669
0
36
#21
GermanLugers23 said:
Sorry but i don`t send money to anyone that i don`t trust we helped a lotta Africans here by sharin`food & weed and so on... See all African Refugees come to Europe not to you guys... And askin` a question like that is real fucked up cuz it sound like "Hey hopefully he did`nt do shit so i got a reason for myself that i don`t help" ...
It was just a question that was pointing a finger back at you since you were pointing it at the US like we are the only ones who dont give money (WHICH WE DO, WE GIVE BILLIONS, SO WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT). I mean its popular to hate america all over the world, but you are making yourself look like a fuckin fool.

This makes me sick how blind some people are on this board. "Bush doesnt care about black people" "US has money for war but not africa". Heres a trivia question: Which recent US president tripled the amount of humanitrian aid the US gives to Africa to a toal of 9 billion by the year 2010? a)george w bush B)george w bush or c) george w bush. you whiny brainwashed pussies need to get kanyes dick out your mouth, or at least read the fuckin newspaper before you jump in with your al sharpton anti-us rhetoric. its laughable. How many billions is germany giving to africa by 2010? LOL. Match our 9 bill then you can feel free to talk on the subject.

And ive been across western europe and i see all the african refugees over there. most of th people working shit jobs and hawking fake merchandise on street corners were these africans. dead broke, no money. Dont pretend the majority of western europeans see these black africans as equals....
 
Apr 25, 2002
4,444
495
83
#22
ParkBoyz said:
A lot of their debts are already relieved, and again, if they mustered up a powerful internal unity and utilized their resources effectively, and suddenly turned themselves around focusing any aim on America, that's called 'war'.
I'm confused, are you suggestiong Africa declare war against the United States?

Is there any possibilty Africa can find a stake in the current world system?

Also, it sounds like you are advocating self reliance in Africa. Are you suggesting Africa trade within Africa only?
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
45
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#23
What the World Bank has recommended are both massive cuts in the education budgets of African countries -- spending cuts reaching 50 percent for some universities (for buildings and salaries of staff and teachers) -- and cuts in enrollment. Paul Johnson, a writer for the New York Times Magazine, describes such external initiatives in an article entitled "Colonialism's Back and Not a Moment Too Soon."[5] In this article, Johnson makes three points about African countries: (1) they are economically bankrupt; (2) they have discovered that they cannot govern themselves; and (3) they are now asking the colonial powers to return to run them. As unbelievable as these assertions may seem, they reflect the position of both the World Bank and the IMF as they extend their hegemony over Africa and other "less-developed" regions of the planet.

One of the central mechanisms by which this recolonization process is carried out is the loan system through structural adjustment programs.

[...]

Once a loan is taken, paying it back can be a back-breaking matter. But this is only a part of the problem. Even more pernicious is that the World Bank often dictates how the borrowed money is to be spent, which is specified through a whole set of "conditionalities." One of them is the drastic reduction in public spending for higher education, which can be cut by as much as 50 percent. Other conditions include equally devastating cuts in the number of civil servants and massive currency devaluations that dramatically diminish the purchasing power of many Africans, while at the same time dramatically increasing the cost of imported products.

The end result of structural adjustment programs, such as those proposed for South Africa, can be a country that is even more bankrupt, more unable to repay its loans, and more impoverished, as its currency is devalued, its services are gutted, and its agricultural sector is turned upside down to produce cash crops for export rather than food for the people's subsistence. This has been the case in Zimbabwe, where the World Bank persuaded the government to shift production supports from food crops like maize to export crops like tobacco. Not surprisingly, malnutrition has increased and infant mortality has doubled.

http://www.namebase.org/ppost13.html
 
Apr 25, 2002
4,444
495
83
#24
nhojsmith said:
It was just a question that was pointing a finger back at you since you were pointing it at the US like we are the only ones who dont give money (WHICH WE DO, WE GIVE BILLIONS, SO WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT). I mean its popular to hate america all over the world, but you are making yourself look like a fuckin fool.

This makes me sick how blind some people are on this board. "Bush doesnt care about black people" "US has money for war but not africa". Heres a trivia question: Which recent US president tripled the amount of humanitrian aid the US gives to Africa to a toal of 9 billion by the year 2010? a)george w bush B)george w bush or c) george w bush. you whiny brainwashed pussies need to get kanyes dick out your mouth, or at least read the fuckin newspaper before you jump in with your al sharpton anti-us rhetoric. its laughable. How many billions is germany giving to africa by 2010? LOL. Match our 9 bill then you can feel free to talk on the subject.

And ive been across western europe and i see all the african refugees over there. most of th people working shit jobs and hawking fake merchandise on street corners were these africans. dead broke, no money. Dont pretend the majority of western europeans see these black africans as equals....
The United States should give much more to Africa. The problem with loaning money over the years has been transparency. The World Bank and IMF were supposed to alleviate this problem but has only done so to a limited extent. There is still a plethora of ways money from nations or the World Bank / IMF let money fall into the hands of the wrong people.

And the lesson learned here, it should be noted, is throwing money at problems won't make them go away. There is no stability in Africa, and therefore investing heavily in it becomes a major problem.
 
Aug 6, 2006
2,010
0
0
40
#25
MaddDogg said:
I'm confused, are you suggestiong Africa declare war against the United States?

Is there any possibilty Africa can find a stake in the current world system?

Also, it sounds like you are advocating self reliance in Africa. Are you suggesting Africa trade within Africa only?
Naw, I just made recent edits to clarify what I said, you didn't quote me right. Hypothetically speaking if Africa were unified and were alloted military might than debt wouldn't be of any concern to their mobility, what does that matter? America owed Britain plenty of money during this country's independence, but I wasn't suggesting anything, only responding to others who made the comment, I didn't bring it up. I was only speaking hypothetically, I'd never condone war against anybody, I hate wars.

The world system is controlled by elite outside forces, of course Africa has no stake in this because Africa has been dependent for many moons now and doesn't play any elite positions.. Africa doesn't need to be a part of some world system though and shouldn't be unless it benefits them more than dis-connected participation would.

And no, in essence I'm not advocating self reliance, only independence. Meaning trade on their terms. Africa is so rich that if they'd organize then inter-continental trade can indeed suffice with places like Ethiopia playing Middle man. Africa (West African Ghana, Mali, Songhay, etc., East Swahili states) thrived from inter-continental trade via the Sahara and East African Swahili coasts. Imports from China and Arabia were on their terms, only when Europeans invaded, cut off trade routes, and enslaved people is when Africans became dependent.

Education is the major key to all of this, Africa shouldn't have to depend on technological resources from elsewhere, they should be able to manufacture this themselves through know-how and education, which isn't entirely their fault because of the lack of funding in schools, but this is why independence and skill there is necessary. Debt would seem like the biggest problem but it wouldn't be if they allocated resources properly and had better economic advisors..
 
Aug 6, 2006
2,010
0
0
40
#26
2-0-Sixx said:
What the World Bank has recommended are both massive cuts in the education budgets of African countries -- spending cuts reaching 50 percent for some universities (for buildings and salaries of staff and teachers) -- and cuts in enrollment. Paul Johnson, a writer for the New York Times Magazine, describes such external initiatives in an article entitled "Colonialism's Back and Not a Moment Too Soon."[5] In this article, Johnson makes three points about African countries: (1) they are economically bankrupt; (2) they have discovered that they cannot govern themselves; and (3) they are now asking the colonial powers to return to run them. As unbelievable as these assertions may seem, they reflect the position of both the World Bank and the IMF as they extend their hegemony over Africa and other "less-developed" regions of the planet.

One of the central mechanisms by which this recolonization process is carried out is the loan system through structural adjustment programs.

[...]

Once a loan is taken, paying it back can be a back-breaking matter. But this is only a part of the problem. Even more pernicious is that the World Bank often dictates how the borrowed money is to be spent, which is specified through a whole set of "conditionalities." One of them is the drastic reduction in public spending for higher education, which can be cut by as much as 50 percent. Other conditions include equally devastating cuts in the number of civil servants and massive currency devaluations that dramatically diminish the purchasing power of many Africans, while at the same time dramatically increasing the cost of imported products.

The end result of structural adjustment programs, such as those proposed for South Africa, can be a country that is even more bankrupt, more unable to repay its loans, and more impoverished, as its currency is devalued, its services are gutted, and its agricultural sector is turned upside down to produce cash crops for export rather than food for the people's subsistence. This has been the case in Zimbabwe, where the World Bank persuaded the government to shift production supports from food crops like maize to export crops like tobacco. Not surprisingly, malnutrition has increased and infant mortality has doubled.

http://www.namebase.org/ppost13.html

This is what I mean by independence, stop accepting money from people Africa! It only makes things worse, the screwed up mentality there forces the people into believing that they need to be saved and that they're hopeless. All they need is better leaders and economic planners, along with a stable democracy and unity. Things will build from there as Africa has many natural resources.. It doesn't make any sense how they're being used by these much older countries in their infantile stages of development. They know no better, some of them received physical independence no more than 30 years ago, my big brother is older than that. We need western educated folx to actually move out there and make a difference in the internal structure! Long-term investments from people who care..
 
Aug 6, 2006
2,010
0
0
40
#28
Ghana's Uneasy Embrace of Slavery's Diaspora

CAPE COAST, Ghana - For centuries, Africans walked through the infamous "door of no return" at Cape Coast castle directly into slave ships, never to set foot in their homelands again. These days, the portal of this massive fort so central to one of history's greatest crimes has a new name, hung on a sign leading back in from the roaring Atlantic Ocean: "The door of return."

Ghana, through whose ports millions of Africans passed on their way to plantations in the United States, Latin America and the Caribbean, wants its descendants to come back.

Taking Israel as its model, Ghana hopes to persuade the descendants of enslaved Africans to think of Africa as their homeland - to visit, invest, send their children to be educated and even retire here.

"We want Africans everywhere, no matter where they live or how they got there, to see Ghana as their gateway home," J. Otanka Obetsebi-Lamptey, the tourism minister, said on a recent day. "We hope we can help bring the African family back together again."

In many ways it is a quixotic goal. Ghana is doing well by West African standards - with steady economic growth, a stable, democratic government and broad support from the West, making it a favored place for wealthy countries to give aid.

But it remains a very poor, struggling country where a third of the population lives on less than a dollar a day, life expectancy tops out at 59 and basic services like electricity and water are sometimes scarce.

Nevertheless, thousands of African-Americans already live here at least part of the year, said Valerie Papaya Mann, president of the African American Association of Ghana.

To encourage still more to come, or at least visit, Ghana plans to offer a special lifetime visa for members of the diaspora and will relax citizenship requirements so that descendants of slaves can receive Ghanaian passports. The government is also starting an advertising campaign to persuade Ghanaians to treat African-Americans more like long-lost relatives than as rich tourists. That is harder than it sounds.

Many African-Americans who visit Africa are unsettled to find that Africans treat them - even refer to them - the same way as white tourists. The term "obruni," or "white foreigner," is applied regardless of skin color.

To African-Americans who come here seeking their roots, the term is a sign of the chasm between Africans and African-Americans. Though they share a legacy, they experience it entirely differently.

"It is a shock for any black person to be called white," said Ms. Mann, who moved here two years ago. "But it is really tough to hear it when you come with your heart to seek your roots in Africa."

The advertising campaign urges Ghanaians to drop "obruni" in favor of "akwaaba anyemi," a slightly awkward phrase fashioned from two tribal languages meaning "welcome, sister or brother." As part of the effort to reconnect with the diaspora, Ghana plans to honor the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., W. E. B. DuBois and others it calls modern-day Josephs, after the biblical figure who rose from slavery to save his people.

The government plans to hold a huge event in 2007 to commemorate the 200th anniversary of the end of the trans-Atlantic trade by Britain and the 50th anniversary of Ghana's independence. The ceremonies will include traditional African burial rituals for the millions who died as a result of slavery.

Estimates of the trade vary widely. The most reliable suggest that between 12 million and 25 million people living in the vast lands between present-day Senegal and Angola were caught up, and as many as half died en route to the Americas.

Some perished on the long march from the inland villages where they were captured to seaports. Others died in the dungeons of slave castles and forts, where they were sometimes kept for months, until enough were gathered to pack the hold of a ship. Still others died in the middle passage, the longest leg of the triangular journey between Europe, Africa and the Americas. Of the estimated 11 million who crossed the sea, most went to South America and the Caribbean. About 500,000 are believed to have ended up in the United States.

The mass deportations and the divisions the slave trade wrought are wounds from which Africa still struggles to recover.

Ghana was the first sub-Saharan African nation to shake off its colonial rulers, winning its independence from Britain in 1957. Its founding father, Kwame Nkrumah, attended Lincoln University, a historically black college in Pennsylvania, and saw in African-Americans a key to developing the new nation.

(Page 2 of 2)

"Nkrumah saw the American Negro as the vanguard of the African people," said Henry Louis Gates Jr., chairman of the African and African-American studies department at Harvard, who first traveled to Ghana when he was 20 and fresh out of Harvard, afire with Nkrumah's spirit. "He wanted to be able to utilize the services and skills of African-Americans as Ghana made the transition from colonialism to independence."

Many African-Americans, from Maya Angelou to Malcolm X, visited Ghana in the 1950's and 60's, and a handful stayed. To Nkrumah, the struggle for civil rights in the diaspora and the struggles for independence from colonial rule in Africa were inextricably linked, both being expressions of the desire of black people everywhere to regain their freedom.

But Nkrumah was ousted in a coup in 1966, and by then Pan-Africanism had already given way to nationalism and cold war politics, sending much of the continent down a trail of autocracy, civil war and heartbreak.

Still, African-Americans are drawn to Ghana's rich culture, and the history of slavery.

Ghana still has dozens of slave forts, each a chilling reminder of the brutality of the trade. At Elmina Castle, built by the Portuguese in 1482 and taken over by the Dutch 150 years later, visitors are guided through a Christian chapel built adjacent to the hall where slaves were auctioned, and the balcony over the women's dungeons from which the fort's governor would choose a concubine from the chattel below.

The room through which slaves passed into waiting ships is the emotional climax of the tour, a suffocating dungeon dimly lit by sunlight pouring through a narrow portal leading to the churning sea.

"You feel our history here," said Dianne Mark, an administrator at Central Michigan University who visited Elmina Castle, six miles from Cape Coast castle, in early December, tears welling in her eyes as she gazed across the massive, buttressed walls to the ocean. "This is where our people are from. That is a deep, deep experience. I look at everyone and wonder, 'Could he have been my cousin? Could she have been my aunt?' "

Like any family reunion, this one is layered with joy and tears. For African-Americans and others in the African diaspora, there is lingering hostility and confusion about the role Africans played in the slave trade.

"The myth was our African ancestors were out on a walk one day and some bad white dude threw a net over them," Mr. Gates said. "But that wasn't the way it happened. It wouldn't have been possible without the help of Africans."

Many Africans, meanwhile, often fail to see any connection at all between them and African-Americans, or feel African-Americans are better off for having been taken to the United States. Many Africans strive to emigrate; for the past 15 years, the number of Africans moving to the United States has surpassed estimates of the number forced there during any of the peak years of the slave trade. The number of immigrants from Ghana in the United States is larger than that of any other African country except Nigeria, according to the 2000 census.

"So many Africans want to go to America, so they can't understand why Americans would want to come here," said Philip Amoa-Mensah, a guide at Elmina Castle. "Maybe Ghanaians think they are lucky to be from America, even though their ancestors went through so much pain."

The relationship is clearly a work in progress. Ghanaians are still learning of their ancestors' pivotal roles in the slave trade, and slave forts on the coast, long used to thousands of foreign visitors, have in recent years become sites for school field trips.

When the United States and the United Nations gave Ghana money to rehabilitate and restore Cape Coast castle, the government agency responsible for the castle repainted it white. Residents of Cape Coast were thrilled to see the moisture-blackened castle spruced up, but African-Americans living in Ghana were horrified, feeling that the history of their ancestors was being, quite literally, whitewashed.

"It didn't go over too well," said Kohain Nathanyah Halevi, an African-American who lives near Cape Coast.

A recent African-American visitor to Cape Coast castle took the emotionally charged step through the door of no return, only to be greeted by a pair of toddlers playing in a fishing boat on the other side, pointing and shouting, "obruni, obruni!"

William Kwaku Moses, 71, a retired security guard who sells shells to tourists on the other side of the door of no return, shushed the children.

"We are trying," he said, with a shrug.
 
May 5, 2006
976
33
0
42
#29
Lol - u dumb fuck Germany pays 200 Million € per year allone for subventions of Cotton Production in Afrika . You`re a fuckin clown and don`t see shit behind the Scenes :D 9 Billions ? That ain`t shit dude ... And Fuck Kanye West i couldnt care less ... I don`t five a fuck about any rapper`s political orrientation. U dumb fuck - do you really believe people blow they`re self up for no reason ? And i don`t fuckin` hate you`re country i just hate Nazis and George Bush is defenatly a Nazi...
 
Aug 6, 2006
2,010
0
0
40
#31
GermanLugers23 said:
Lol - u dumb fuck Germany pays 200 Million € per year allone for subventions of Cotton Production in Afrika . You`re a fuckin clown and don`t see shit behind the Scenes :D 9 Billions ? That ain`t shit dude ... And Fuck Kanye West i couldnt care less ... I don`t five a fuck about any rapper`s political orrientation. U dumb fuck - do you really believe people blow they`re self up for no reason ? And i don`t fuckin` hate you`re country i just hate Nazis and George Bush is defenatly a Nazi...
Who are you talking to? Kanye West was not a main point of contention, that was an inane comparison, what are you talking about? As if Africa owes Germany (the birthplace of the Nazis you so hate) anything anyways, Ha! Please.. Germany isn't shit, you guys just knocked down the Berlin wall like 2 years ago (sarcasm) and you expect us to believe Germany is a just country?
 
Dec 8, 2005
669
0
36
#32
from this:

GermanLugers23 said:
Germany pays 200 Million € per year allone for subventions of Cotton Production in Afrika
to this:

GermanLugers23 said:
9 Billions ? That ain`t shit dude
LOL. If 9b USD isnt shit, then what is your 271.54m USD?

Look adolph, i didnt say anything in this thread about people blowing themselves up. All i did was point out that George Bush, who people love to hate, has secured more money for africa than any other president. and that the US, who people love to hate, has given more to africa than any other nation. and you fit my other post to a t. you expect more from us, even though we already do the most, because we are the shit.

Hate bush all you want, i dont like him myself, he has increased the power of the central government more than any president since lincoln. but with your infinite wisdom, please enlighten the rest of us to the "behind the scenes" knowledge that you possess.

Clinton was sitting around getting head from some fat bitch while people were being chopped up in rwanda in 94. Bush tripled the amount of money we (the US including myself and most of the other people posting in this thread, not YOU) give to africa. He secured the largest single contribution to fight aids and malaria in africa in history. This was the biggest health conribution made by ANY government ANYWHERE EVER. Trade between the US and africa has tripled since 2001.
 
May 1, 2002
2,929
567
0
42
#34
does Africa have oil reserves ? I dont know if it does but if it did I'd assume the politicians here would make a case to go fight for "the people and to fight terror" as they like to say...don't alot of nations in Africa owe alot money to the World bank ? and we know who runs that...Dubya's boy Paul Wolfowitz
 
May 5, 2006
976
33
0
42
#35
That 200 millions are ONLY the "cotton production subvention" to show you what 9 billions are worth ... it ain`t shit
The Complete Subventions are way more assumatly arround 100 billion Per Year (not till 2010) but it`s geddin` devided by every european country thats part of the EU. Like Germany Netherlands , Italy , France , Poland and so on ...
And don`t call me Adolf you dumb Fuck ...
btw... there comes an "inernal" african problem in to play . The Corruption ... See it`s like Bush give the Corrupt Motherfuckers 9Billions and they take the money and buy oil & weapons from american companys that were run by Bush Wolvowitz & Dick Cheney ... And people like you are happy to "help" afrika ... But reality is just Bush and those dudes fill they`re pocket, Those Corrupt Motherfuckers in Africa buy Weapons and fill they`re pockets and seed hate to other Africans and the average African gotta die for that shit... And it`s a nice circular flow of money don`t you think ?
 
Apr 25, 2002
4,444
495
83
#36
Stability is the key, not financial investment.

Also, there is a GREAT book called "States and Power in Africa" by Jeffrey Herbst which sheds a lot of light on the problems African States face. Before you have a Pan-African movement or anything like that, you need a stable central or local governments, and this guy talks a lot about that, one thing he says, sadly, is that Africa might have to go through a serious of wars like Europeans did for centuries to solidify their government and create solid boundries.
 
Apr 25, 2002
4,444
495
83
#37
Note the affect of a weak government on stability.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/25/world/africa/25somalia.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1

GALKAYO, Somalia — Beyond clan rivalry and Islamic fervor, an entirely different motive is helping fuel the chaos in Somalia: profit.

A whole class of opportunists — from squatter landlords to teenage gunmen for hire to vendors of out-of-date baby formula — have been feeding off the anarchy in Somalia for so long that they refuse to let go.

They do not pay taxes, their businesses are totally unregulated, and they have skills that are not necessarily geared toward a peaceful society.

In the past few weeks, some Western security officials say, these profiteers have been teaming up with clan fighters and radical Islamists to bring down Somalia’s transitional government, which is the country’s 14th attempt at organizing a central authority and ending the free-for-all of the past 16 years.

They are attacking government troops, smuggling in arms and using their business savvy to raise money for the insurgency. And they are surprisingly open about it.

Omar Hussein Ahmed, an olive oil exporter in Mogadishu, the capital, said he and a group of fellow traders recently bought missiles to shoot at government soldiers.

“Taxes are annoying,” he explained.

Maxamuud Nuur Muradeeste, a squatter landlord who makes a few hundred dollars a year renting out rooms in the former Ministry of Minerals and Water, said he recently invited insurgents to stash weapons on “his” property. He will do whatever it takes, he said, to thwart the government’s plan to reclaim thousands of pieces of public property.

“If this government survives, how will I?” Mr. Muradeeste said.

Layer this problem on top of Somalia’s sticky clan issues, its poverty and its nomadic culture, and it is no wonder that the transitional government seems to be overwhelmed by the same raw antigovernment defiance that has torpedoed earlier attempts at stabilizing the country.

Granted, many of the transitional leaders acknowledge that they have made mistakes and that they have not played the clan politics as deftly as they could have. But they say they believe that there are some Somalis — actually, many Somalis — who will never go along with any program.

“Even if we turned Mogadishu into Houston, there would still be people resisting us,” said Abdirizak Adam Hassan, chief of staff for Somalia’s transitional president, Abdullahi Yusuf Ahmed. “I’m talking about the guys bringing in expired medicine, selling arms, harboring terrorists. They don’t have a clan name. They’re a congregation of people whose best interests are served by no government.”

In the past month, the resistance has intensified and more than 1,000 people have been killed or wounded as the country has sunk into its deepest crisis since the famine days of the early 1990s.

Most of the victims are civilians, like Amina Abdullahi, who recently fled Mogadishu with two small children holding her hands and a baby tied to her back.

“I don’t understand why this is such a problem,” she said. “If people don’t like this government, can’t they wait until there is an election and vote them out?”

American diplomats had mostly shied away from Somalia since the infamous “Black Hawk Down” episode in 1993 when Somali militiamen shot down two American helicopters and killed 18 United States soldiers. But now the Americans are involved again, driven by a counterterrorism agenda and armed with a pledge of $100 million to rebuild the country.

And it is exactly this kind of hefty support that is fueling the resistance’s urgency, because the opportunists sense that this transitional government, more than any other, poses the biggest threat yet to the gravy days of anarchy.

Somalis are legendary individualists, and when the central government imploded in 1991, people quickly devised ways to fend for themselves.

Businessmen opened their own hospitals, schools, telephone companies and even privatized mail services. Men who were able to muster private armies, often former military officers, seized the biggest prizes: abandoned government property, like ports and airfields, which could generate as much as $40,000 a day. They became the warlords. Many trafficked in guns and drugs and taxed their fellow Somalis.

Beneath the warlords were clan-based networks of thousands of people — adolescent enforcers, stevedores, clerks, truck drivers and their families — all tied into the chaos economy. Ditto for the freelance landlords and duty-free importers.

Over the years, prominent members of the Hawiye clan, Mogadishu’s biggest, have tried to cobble together a government and end this system. But they have failed every time. Though Somalia is notoriously fragmented among dozens of rival clans and subclans, and has been that way for centuries, clans alone did not seem to be the problem.

“It was the opportunists who didn’t see a role for themselves in the future,” said Mohammed Abdi Balle, an elder here in Galkayo, a city about 450 miles north of Mogadishu.

Not all opportunists had the same agenda. Many in the business community became fed up with paying protection fees to the warlords and their countless middle-men.

Business leaders then backed a grass-roots Islamist movement that drove the warlords out of Mogadishu last summer and brought peace to the city for the first time in 15 years.

The Islamists seemed to be the perfect solution for the businessmen. They delivered stability, which was good for most business, but they did not confiscate property or levy heavy taxes. They called themselves an administration, not a government.

“Our best days were under them,” said Abdi Ali Jama, who owns an electrical supply shop in Mogadishu.

But then a radical wing took over, and the Islamists declared war on Ethiopia, which commands one of the mightiest armies in Africa. The Ethiopians, with covert American help, crushed the Islamist army in December and bolstered the authority of Somalia’s transitional government in the capital.

Many residents initially welcomed the transitional government. But then it made some questionable calls that cut across clan and business lines. It abruptly closed ports and took over airfields belonging to Hawiye businessmen, denying them revenue they had been accustomed to receiving for years. Many Somalis began to worry that the transitional government, which includes elders from all of Somalia’s clans, was being pushed around by the Darod, the clan of the transitional president and a historic rival to the Hawiye.

At first, just a few Hawiye sub-clans — mainly those connected to the Islamists — took up arms. But as the government has moved to curtail the profiteering, business leaders say that more and more clans are embracing the rebel cause.

For many Abgal, an influential subclan of the Hawiye, the last straw came in mid-March when the government raised port taxes by 300 percent. Mr. Ahmed, the olive oil exporter and an Abgal, said that after that, there was a mass Abgal defection to the insurgency. “The government is trying to destroy business as we know it,” he said.

Despite attempts at a cease-fire between insurgents and government forces, the violence has raged virtually unabated in Mogadishu.

And once again, the opportunists have stepped in. In some areas, displaced people are forced to pay a “shade tax” to local residents for resting under their trees.

Mohammed Ibrahim and Yuusuf Maxamuud contributed reporting from Mogadishu, Somalia.
 
Aug 6, 2006
2,010
0
0
40
#39
American Idol seems to be putting in some work, Simon looked like he was about to cry when he went out there, lol, naw that ain't funny. On the real though, there are people out there who care, just not enough.