WHY DID KALIKO NOT GET A VIDEO

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Mar 12, 2006
3,105
4
0
35
#42
Exactly! I fail to see why Strange even wants to put out other albums. With numbers like those (especially Kutt's total), it makes you wonder why they even mess around with other albums outside of Tech. If you area gonna release all these albums, at least make a bigger effort to get the artist's names out there... :ermm:
no shit... thats what im sayin..

if you are going to put all your time, heart and energy into something just to have nobody hear it, its just fucked.

videos are pointless months after the release.. they got the music thing on lock, but i dont think they understand the bidness side of it all
 
Sep 17, 2003
955
7
0
#43
no shit... thats what im sayin..

if you are going to put all your time, heart and energy into something just to have nobody hear it, its just fucked.

videos are pointless months after the release.. they got the music thing on lock, but i dont think they understand the bidness side of it all

I feel that 100%! The video and single needs to start being pushed around two months before the release date. I really believe they know this... because it's common sense.


So then, why is it taking months to get a video out there? Is there any effort to get Strange artists on the radio (including Tech) at all anymore? I remember when Strange used to announce dates that they were "going to radio" with a single off of "Absolute Power." I know the internet is a huge factor in this modern music climate, but they have got to get these lesser-known artists' names out there.


There has got to be a reason that we, the hardcore fans, are not seeing. Independent artist? Yes. Very little money? No. The Kansas City Star reported last year that Strange Music was losing money as recently as two years ago, but that in 2008, they were actually poised to make over 11 million dollars! (I shit you not. I couldn't believe that figure when I read it, either!)


So, there is a reason. BUT, there really shouldn't be an excuse with a Tech N9ne album. I can see maybe with the others, but not when it comes to the "bread and butter" of Strange Music. :confused:
 
Oct 24, 2002
9,569
38
48
39
www.beekc.com
#44
Vitiligo - 15,634 as of 7/06/08
Feature Presentation - 2,658 as of 10/19/08



Tech..... not kaliko...

my .02
3,000 cds tha is terrible...wow..

bu yeah i agree wih Tech havin better hooks...i got tired of krizz along time ago on hooks...i like i every now and then but it gets old and tech rips hooks....you can only hear HEEEEEEEEEYY OOOO OOOHHHH HEY OOOO HEEEEEEEEEEY O..so many times
 
Jul 3, 2008
4,110
194
0
37
#45
There has got to be a reason that we, the hardcore fans, are not seeing. Independent artist? Yes. Very little money? No. The Kansas City Star reported last year that Strange Music was losing money as recently as two years ago, but that in 2008, they were actually poised to make over 11 million dollars! (I shit you not. I couldn't believe that figure when I read it, either!)
i belive that 11 mil mark....tech got hella stans everywhere...hes the only artist wit his type of music so its a monopoly, n now he has the resources to make it bigger then ever. good shit

n videos aint worthless after the cd is alredii old news...youtube is a market in itself