Who's gonna win the NFC West?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

?


  • Total voters
    58

Chree

Medicated
Dec 7, 2005
32,404
13,935
113
40
#43
Sorry man. No way the Niners are a top NFC team.

Some additional teams that are better than the Niners:

Eagles
Falcons

Mid-level NFC team is more like it.
How are the Eagles better?
Eagles were better with Westbrook/Mcnabb

it seems as if they are rebuilding again....
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#45
I guess we have a different opinion of what a top team is

I consider a top a favorite to win the Super Bowl... probably the top 3 seeds

I think the niners will be a 5 or 6 seed, but not a Super Bowl favorite... if you consider a playoff team a top team that's cool... I just have a different interpretation of what that term means
I just mean "top team" as one of the best teams in their conference. The Niners are NOT a Super Bowl contender and I wouldn't say they are even top 3, but they are one of the better teams in the NFC. That's what I mean.

Like I said, I only see 4 teams that are "for-sure" better than the Niners right now. Every other team is debatable.
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#46
Sorry man. No way the Niners are a top NFC team.

Some additional teams that are better than the Niners:

Eagles
Falcons

Mid-level NFC team is more like it.
Both are debatable.

You're a reasonable man so I won't accuse you of hating, so we'll have to agree to disagree.

I don't see any team outside of the 4 that I mentioned being unquestionably better than SF.
 

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
48
#48
I think the Niners could be a SuperBowl contender because the NFC isn't as competitive as the AFC. In my opinion the NFC is wide open. The home opener against the Saints is a very important game even though it's early in the season. You never know, the 49ers and Saints could end up tied at the end of the year. If 49ers beat the Saints, look out and it's a strong possibility that it could happen. The 49ers pretty much had the Vikings beat last year and the Vikings were a top team.

In the AFC you have the Patriots, Colts, Jets, Ravens, Chargers, Bengals, Steelers, Titans, Texans..... it's funk in the AFC and a bit tougher.
 
Jun 1, 2002
7,358
14
0
45
#49
You mean an unproven Kolb? The guy who threw 4 TDs and 3 INTs last year in the only experience he has?

Come on. He has proven nothing.

Wanna bet some money that Kolb has a better season than Smith?

They have equal weapons too, more or less. Kolb is better and I think you can tell.

You're a football fan.
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#51
Wanna bet some money that Kolb has a better season than Smith?

They have equal weapons too, more or less. Kolb is better and I think you can tell.

You're a football fan.
Kolb will have a better season numbers-wise because they are a passing team. However, he is not anywhere near ready to carry that team. Smith won't be asked to carry our team, we have a top defense and powerful running game for that.
 
Dec 2, 2006
6,161
44
0
#52
Both are debatable.

You're a reasonable man so I won't accuse you of hating, so we'll have to agree to disagree.

I don't see any team outside of the 4 that I mentioned being unquestionably better than SF.

Before you proclaim the 49ers as a superior NFC team, don't you think you need to see how A. Smith does for 4-6 games. He is going to be the determining factor because you and I both know, if he can't get it done, it is going to be a long season considering your #2 and #3 QB suck.
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#53
Before you proclaim the 49ers as a superior NFC team, don't you think you need to see how A. Smith does for 4-6 games. He is going to be the determining factor because you and I both know, if he can't get it done, it is going to be a long season considering your #2 and #3 QB suck.
He did fine last year and has progressed since. It's unlikely he gets worse, and if he were to play like he played last year, that should be more than enough to win a few more games due to the O-Line being competent this year.

Like I've said before, you sit there and act like only 49ers fans predict the team is going to be one of the better teams in the NFC. It's usually people like yourself - raider fans or fans of other teams that have something against the Niners - that think otherwise.

Another thing.. Shouldn't YOU wait to see how Campbell does for 4-6 games before you pretend the raiders have a chance at being 10-6 and competing with the Chargers for the AFC West?
 
Dec 2, 2006
6,161
44
0
#54
He did fine last year and has progressed since. It's unlikely he gets worse, and if he were to play like he played last year, that should be more than enough to win a few more games due to the O-Line being competent this year.

Like I've said before, you sit there and act like only 49ers fans predict the team is going to be one of the better teams in the NFC. It's usually people like yourself - raider fans or fans of other teams that have something against the Niners - that think otherwise.

Another thing.. Shouldn't YOU wait to see how Campbell does for 4-6 games before you pretend the raiders have a chance at being 10-6 and competing with the Chargers for the AFC West?
The NFC west is on a platter for you guys, there is no doubt about that. But A. Smith's track record says he will regress this season. If not, then good for him. Analysts predict the 49ers to win the West, not make a deep run into the playoffs.

You kill your own argument with the he progressed talk? How can you tell that in the preseason? Have the 49ers first team lit up the score board in any game this preseason? I honestly don't know.

Campbell is a proven QB in the league. Not elite, but capable of getting the job done. He has led his team to the playoffs before. Even then, I think Gradkowski could be the man. Don't act as if the Raiders QB situation is not looking better than the 49ers.
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#55
But A. Smith's track record says he will regress this season.
How do you figure? Oh wait, nevermind. You're looking at the stat pages on NFL.com. That much is obvious.

He was shitty his rookie year. He got better his 2nd year. He got hurt his 3rd year, but was played anyway because Nolan was the most incompetent coach in the NFL. He completely missed his 4th season due to that injury. He came back last season and did a pretty good job.

Where do you see regression? You obviously know nothing about the kid and rely on a stat page to back your argument.

I'm not the biggest fan of Alex Smith, but if you're gonna hate on him, at least do a little research first.



radiostationrep said:
Analysts predict the 49ers to win the West, not make a deep run into the playoffs.
NO SHIT.

What point does that prove? New Orleans and Minnesota are the only teams I've seen expected to make a deep run into the NFC playoffs.


radiostationrep said:
You kill your own argument with the he progressed talk? How can you tell that in the preseason? Have the 49ers first team lit up the score board in any game this preseason? I honestly don't know.
He's more confident and comfortable in that offense. Anyone who actually watches the guy can see this. He's looked better than he ever has, not only in preseason games, but in camp. I've seen it first-hand (we actually get to watch our team in person). The guy has never looked as good as he does now.

You can take away individual aspects of a player's game from preseason play.. Accuracy, decisiveness, poise, etc.. However, you cannot take any team effort into consideration due to starters not playing, vanilla schemes, etc..

I don't put much stock into anything in the preseason, but Alex Smith has been getting beefed up by our reporters all offseason and you can actually see the differences in his game.


radiostationrep said:
Campbell is a proven QB in the league. Not elite, but capable of getting the job done. He has led his team to the playoffs before.
This is all true, but NOT WITH YOUR TEAM.

If you're gonna tell me I need to wait 4-6 games, then you need to do the same.


radiostationrep said:
Don't act as if the Raiders QB situation is not looking better than the 49ers.
As far as backups go, yes, the raiders are in a better situation. As far as the two starters, Campbell and Smith are on the same level right now. We've already had that discussion.
 

RM211

Sicc OG
Feb 10, 2006
8,173
6,523
113
41
#58
Through the turmoil of the qb situation, I think derek anderson will have a good year dude has a fuccin cannon and cards do have weapons out there as long as he has time he'll picc apart ur defense all game long, plus there defense is fuccin solid
 

Stealth

Join date: May '98
May 8, 2002
7,137
1,177
113
41
#59
I remember reading some article last year that I agreed with. It basically said how most QB's wait a few years to start. Alex smith got thrown in the mix, had a different offensive coordinator every year, played hurt, and sat out a season. Basically saying there isn't enough there to say he's a bad quarterback or a bust, and there isn't enough to say whether he's a good qb and a smart first round pick. Dude needs an opportunity to make a little resume for himself. 49ers did just fine with him last year, and this year he's surrounded by so much goddamn talent, he's gonna have absolutely no excuse. He better have the best season of his life.
 

RM211

Sicc OG
Feb 10, 2006
8,173
6,523
113
41
#60
And why is everybody sayin its a weak div.? Why cause there records? I think that's jus the opposite every team in that div. Battles with each other every game, yea the rams are lousy and seahawks have been as well of late but they all go down to the wire...should be another helluva year watchin these games in the nfc west
Cardinals
Niners
Seahawks
Rams