2-0-Sixx said:
I thought I already did:
"The NFC West is going to be much more competitive and I believe this year all four teams will be fighting for the top spot, whereas the AFC west two teams will likely suck..."
The same thing was said last year and 3 teams ended up .500 or worse. The Cards were supposed to be the pick to win and they ended up LAST in the division. I dont expect them to be much better again this year. The Rams are shaky as best and the recievers are all a year older. They better gear up S-Jack again. The 9ers SHOULD be better, but so shoud the Hawks. The Hawks and Niners are the only ones that made moves that were even mentionalbe in the NFC West and there was really NO major "wow" signings be either squad. Kerney? Davis? Are you kidding me? Better than the ones they replaced? Im not sold....
Whereas in the AFC West, SD is lookin good as last year with Rivers having a yeart under him now, The Broncos made TONS of moves and KC is peaking. I wont even mention the Raiders. Last year, 3 out of 4 teams in the AFC West were vying for a playoff spot till week 16; thats just insane.
Would Seattle even be playoff contneders in the AFC West? Or any other NFC division for that matter? Sometimes i thank the football gods for being in that poor excuse for a division.
So through all that, you STILL think the NFC West is better or gonna be better? I dont know about all that bro. I mean, we can only ait and see, but at this very moment, the AFC West looks better on paper, yet again, than the NFC Wor...er...West.