Which fight was the bigger robbery? Pac vs Marquez III or Pac vs Bradley?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Which fight was the bigger robbery?


  • Total voters
    26

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#13
Chisora vs Robert Helenius was worse too. Lara vs Williams as well. Some really terrible decisions this past year or so, really bad.
Lara vs Williams was bad. The judges saw the human being growing from Lara's dome and thought he lost the fight. He didn't, he won that fight.

In Chisora vs Helenius they gave it to Helenius cause he was white, lol.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#14
Lara vs Williams was bad. The judges saw the human being growing from Lara's dome and thought he lost the fight. He didn't, he won that fight.

In Chisora vs Helenius they gave it to Helenius cause he was white, lol.
those judges in the lara-williams fight are still suspended to this day, that's all we need to say about that.

and lol that basically sums up the Helenius victory. "Viking warrior!"
 

thebrain

@HuseyinTheBrain
Feb 16, 2008
768
0
0
39
Sacramento, CA
www.BrainChildMedia.com
#16
marquez fight was extremely close. marquez could have won by 2 rounds MAX. pac dominated the bradley fight. bradley was throwing back but it was NOT EFFECTIVE at all. So 7-8 rounds for marquez is not as big of a robbery as 10-11 rounds for pacquiao (vs. Bradley). and honestly i did think Pacquaio won the marquez fight and wasn't a robbery, just a close fight