Da1nonlyBAYCAT said:
You say that rap didn't create the problems and that it just exposed it, well you forgot that it perpetuates it and glorifies them. Rather than describing black on black crime as negative and horrifying in songs, it is used in lyrics to show how "hard" a rapper is. Rather than taking a stand and abhorring what the government did in the eighties by implanting crack into inner cities, rap glorifies the drug. Rather than making music that would make people in inner cities say "hey we should fuckin do something about this." most popular rap music just glorifies the disempowerment of people living in inner cities.
I don't see how you can use double standards as an argument in support of the word "bitch" when a man that gets a lot of girls is looked at positively while a woman who gets a lot of men is described negatively. If I recall correctly, most men who buy into the habit of using the word "bitch" to describe females loosely will use the word for a woman based simply on what they look like and sometimes not even that. Extreme feminists aren't questioned for what they say because their message has not proven to be as dangerous and polluting to society as those in popular rap music. You say that you have the right to speak your minds, of course that's a given, but the white men in suits decide what will be put on mtv and on the radio. They love seeing the perpetuation of inequaltity and chaos within non-white communities. Sow ho is more to blame, the white man in the suit who seeks out a black rap artist to promote and glorify a message of self-destructive violence and anti-education or the rapper who signs the contract and further feeds the message to the community he came from?
Hardly anyone I know would deny that our government is corrupt and that our system is set up to keep non-whites powerless, but what do you expect to happen? These rich white people in power magically saying "you know what I'm tired of my race of people having all this fucking power, let's equalize education, teach people how to make changes and actually start to enforce anti-discrimnation policy". Fuck no, change has to start from the people who are suppressed not the suppressors. Does glorifying self destruction, degradation of women and mterialism act as a catalyst for social change? no it's the opposite. You made a lot of complaints about society, as you should, so I find it confusing as to how you can not acknowledge the role of popular rap music in programming the minds of our youth to not strive for change. No one's just gonna hand you justice.
I don't see how you can use double standards as an argument in support of the word "bitch" when a man that gets a lot of girls is looked at positively while a woman who gets a lot of men is described negatively. If I recall correctly, most men who buy into the habit of using the word "bitch" to describe females loosely will use the word for a woman based simply on what they look like and sometimes not even that. Extreme feminists aren't questioned for what they say because their message has not proven to be as dangerous and polluting to society as those in popular rap music. You say that you have the right to speak your minds, of course that's a given, but the white men in suits decide what will be put on mtv and on the radio. They love seeing the perpetuation of inequaltity and chaos within non-white communities. Sow ho is more to blame, the white man in the suit who seeks out a black rap artist to promote and glorify a message of self-destructive violence and anti-education or the rapper who signs the contract and further feeds the message to the community he came from?
Hardly anyone I know would deny that our government is corrupt and that our system is set up to keep non-whites powerless, but what do you expect to happen? These rich white people in power magically saying "you know what I'm tired of my race of people having all this fucking power, let's equalize education, teach people how to make changes and actually start to enforce anti-discrimnation policy". Fuck no, change has to start from the people who are suppressed not the suppressors. Does glorifying self destruction, degradation of women and mterialism act as a catalyst for social change? no it's the opposite. You made a lot of complaints about society, as you should, so I find it confusing as to how you can not acknowledge the role of popular rap music in programming the minds of our youth to not strive for change. No one's just gonna hand you justice.
On another note, yes, lyrics do glorify certain things. BUT, if people would listen to these artists TALK, they tell a very different story. They didn't see when 2Pac was doing shit for people, they only saw him being pulled out of a hotel after "sexually assaulting" somebody who admitted to having consentual sex with him. They didn't hear him when he was speaking positively about shit, they only heard him say BITCH and saw him spitting at cameras.
They don't see 50 Cent donating money to help others, they hear about him getting shot at and engaging in rap wars. They don't see Snoop Dogg coaching football and doing shit for the kids, they see him on TV after getting arrested for whatever he did that time.
Fact of the matter is, rap artists do MORE for people in this country than the government does. I understand that young people are influenced by rap artists...but if the media showed the young people that rap artists do VERY POSITIVE THINGS, these kids would know that rappers, for the most part, promote positivity. Nobody sees that good shit though, because POSITIVE doesn't sell...even in the news. There was a news reporter that said, if there was a shooting and a child drowning at the same time, he would cover the shooting...because it makes good t.v.