Western Conference Finals Suns Vs Lakers

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Who will win the conference finals?

  • Suns

    Votes: 23 43.4%
  • Lakers

    Votes: 28 52.8%
  • I can't decide

    Votes: 2 3.8%

  • Total voters
    53

DubbC415

Mickey Fallon
Sep 10, 2002
22,620
6,984
0
39
Tomato Alley
#61
Again, that would have been dope if Brown had actually made the dunk. Thank god the refs were there to give him a foul call. if he HAD made it, no foul would have been made. And he didnt make the shot because of j-rich's shoulder barely grazing his leg, he missed it cuz he was showing off.
 

corinthian

Just Win Baby!!!
Feb 23, 2006
5,704
1,257
113
43
3rd ID
#62
if (when) boston beats l.a. again then kobe might as well flush last years ring down the toilet. or put an asterisk beside it.
The reason LA lost to Boston in 2008 was the fact that Ariza was hurt and they had only one guy who could check Ray and Pierce. Anytime we put Kobe on one of them, the other would burn us. And when Rondo was killing Fisher we had to use Kobe on him leaving Radmanovic guarding Pierce and Sasha on Ray at times. Radmonovic was a fucking starter that year(what a joke) and Bynum was out with injury too.

celtics deserve an asterisk a lot more than we do.
 
Nov 7, 2006
7,383
36
0
40
#65
f it indeed turns into another celts lakers finals then i think this one makes it all the way to game 7 and if we keep up our balling status (especially on the road) then we got one hella shot to win it all. whens the last time a 4 seed won it all?
 
May 8, 2002
996
3
0
48
#67
I expect Channing Frye to play better at home as well as Dragic. However, it's not going to matter at all if we can't grab a fucking defensive rebound. The Lakers are just a bigger, better team. If we win game 3 we have chance to push it to 7. If not, it's over.
 
May 2, 2002
9,580
17
0
43
#68
Hard to beat the Lakers when the only players that show up are Richardson, Duds and Hill.

Hopefully they come to play in game 3 but Im not getting my hopes up.
 

phil

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
7,311
27
0
116
#75
You're an idiot! The Lakers were missing 2 starters(Bynum and Ariza) in that 2008 Finals, you don't hear any excuses do you? You need to shut the fuck up...You're a Hawks fan anyways, fag!!!
bynum and ariza?

youre going to compare them to missing kg and leon powe and tony allen? LETS GET REAL.

boston waxed l.a. during that regular season WITH ariza and bynum in the lineup. matter of fact i think it was by a margin of over 20 points.
 

phil

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
7,311
27
0
116
#77
and we beat boston the next season both games with ariza and bynum in.
our team was injury riddled last year lets get real. you laker fans act like bynum is the most important piece of that team. dude isnt great at all get off his nuts. you put him on the nets or the t wolves and you would never hear about his ass because he's overrated.

like i said before, if we put that 18th banner up this year you have to wonder if the lakers would have stood a chance against a healthy boston team last season. boston is hungry for this one in case you havent noticed. hungrier than 08.

lmao at laker fans chanting "we want boston"

well that's what youre going to get.
 

corinthian

Just Win Baby!!!
Feb 23, 2006
5,704
1,257
113
43
3rd ID
#78
having ariza healthy, would have taken space cadet out of the starting lineup and that makes a world of difference by itself. radmonivic was hopeless on both offense and defense. it was like playing 4 on 5 when he was out there.

as for bynum, he allows us to keep two quality bigs on the court for most of the game. having a combo of bynum/gasol, bynum/odom, or gasol/ odom on the court, while one of the three is resting on the bench makes a big difference as well.