wayne

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

lopro

Sicc OG
Apr 7, 2006
4,549
27
0
34
#11
Filthy_Rich said:
i've seen the original wayne pic. you didn't do much to it. if anything.
i hate when people say shit like this.. its not all what u do to the graphic, its how u make it look in the finished product..



look at work like this.. looks easy as fuck but they gettin hella money for that shit. i personally like it nice job very clean.
 
Mar 28, 2006
1,500
2
0
37
#13
LilRogue said:
i hate when people say shit like this.. its not all what u do to the graphic, its how u make it look in the finished product..



look at work like this.. looks easy as fuck but they gettin hella money for that shit. i personally like it nice job very clean.

That is the truth...thank you
 
Mar 28, 2006
1,500
2
0
37
#14
Filthy_Rich said:
ok, but in your example, the artist did A LOT of things to complete the final product. there's the mirroring, the placement of the trucks, the fading of the trucks in the rear, the coloring on all of the trucks, plus there's the text and graphics. in the little wayne graphic, dude pretty much took a picture of Lil Wayne that was already on a white background and slapped it on a background. He could've put any background behind him and it would've looked fine. all that's needed is a minor color adjustment and you're good to go. in your example, the final ad paints a better picture than the trucks themselves; in this one, the final ad doesn't accomplish anything that the original pic didn't already accomplish.
yeah it doesnt really apply to the picture he posted...but in regaurds to the Lil Wayne picture sometimes its just a good eye for what works well and looks good together, not what new you can introduce to the picture. Agreed he didnt change much tho, but He didnt need too, the picture with that background makes a statement