Troll & Edward Thizzerhands I have a question for both of you. . . .

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jul 22, 2006
809
0
0
44
#1
For the purposes of this question when I say 9/11 I mean the exact time, day, and events as they happened (that means the way you believe they happened).

Do you think 9/11 would have happened under a Clinton/Gore administration?

Do you think 9/11 would have happened under a Gore/Liberman administration?

Do you believe another significant “terrorist” event of the same magnitude and scope could have or would have happened under a Gore/Liberman administration? Something just not 9/11 specifically.

This isn’t some trick questioning. It isn’t about diverting attention from Bush/Cheney, trying to start a debate or anything else. It is just me trying to better understand your position on the whole who/what/where/why/when of 9/11.
 
Dec 25, 2003
12,356
218
0
70
#3
Most 9/11 "truth tellers", "revisionists", "alternate theory proposers" (or whatever label is least offensive to the people on this board), believe in global apparatuses and socities that are light years beyond your very simplistic Gore/Clinton/Ted Kennedy, Republican vs. Democrat simplistic breakdown of American politics.
 
Aug 8, 2003
5,360
22
0
43
#4
WHITE DEVIL said:
Most 9/11 "truth tellers", "revisionists", "alternate theory proposers" (or whatever label is least offensive to the people on this board), believe in global apparatuses and socities that are light years beyond your very simplistic Gore/Clinton/Ted Kennedy, Republican vs. Democrat simplistic breakdown of American politics.
^^^
thats very on point...

Deadpool said:
Do you think 9/11 would have happened under a Clinton/Gore administration?
Clinton and gore have come and gone without 9/11... so im confused as to this question.. but in my opinion it wasnt finished being planned when they were in office so im going to say no..

Deadpool said:
Do you think 9/11 would have happened under a Gore/Liberman administration?
As whitedevil has already pointed out.. there was never going to be a Gore/liberman administration.. the voting debacle that was florida then later ohio made sure of that... kerry was skull and bones with bush, and hilary is a member of the bilderbergs..

Deadpool said:
Do you believe another significant “terrorist” event of the same magnitude and scope could have or would have happened under a Gore/Liberman administration? Something just not 9/11 specifically.
No, however, it is my belief an attack of 9/11 scope and magnitude was planned wayyyyy ahead of time.. a sort of coup of our constitution by undercover nazi sympathizers....

Deadpool said:
This isn’t some trick questioning. It isn’t about diverting attention from Bush/Cheney, trying to start a debate or anything else. It is just me trying to better understand your position on the whole who/what/where/why/when of 9/11.
I will never poke fun or attack someone for asking questions for the purpose of better understanding..

To sum it up.. IMO...it wouldnt matter who was in office because theres a shadow government that extends into all political parties and nearly all forms of media.. why did they choose now?? because bush, the grandson of one of hitlers greatest buisness partners, came into power.. they repeated the reichstag fire to implement nazi like control over the united states with little opposition.. understand, the encroachment of power hungry barbarous politicians began a looonggg time ago..



but dont take my word for it....
vvvv
John F. Hylan (new york mayor 1918-1925) said:
"The real menace of our republic is this invisible government which like a giant octopus, sprawls its slimy length over city, state and nation. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a self created screen. At the head of this octopus are the rockefeller standard oil intrests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as international bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the U.S. government for their own selfish purposes, they practically control both political parties"-1922
Pres. John F. Kennedy; in a speech at Columbia University said:
"The high office of the president has been used to foment a plot to destroy America's freedom, and before I leave office, I must inform the citizens of their plight." ―
 
Jul 22, 2006
809
0
0
44
#6
WHITE DEVIL said:
Most 9/11 "truth tellers", "revisionists", "alternate theory proposers" (or whatever label is least offensive to the people on this board), believe in global apparatuses and socities that are light years beyond your very simplistic Gore/Clinton/Ted Kennedy, Republican vs. Democrat simplistic breakdown of American politics.
Thank you so much for your worthless comments. You know little if anything about my views on American Politics and surely have never seen a breakdown explaining them.

I asked a specific series of questions to be answered by two specific people. You can try and assume the reasoning for the questioning, but odds are youre simplistic conclusions will be totally wrong.


TROLL said:
To sum it up.. IMO...it wouldnt matter who was in office because theres a shadow government that extends into all political parties and nearly all forms of media.. why did they choose now?? because bush, the grandson of one of hitlers greatest buisness partners, came into power.. they repeated the reichstag fire to implement nazi like control over the united states with little opposition.. understand, the encroachment of power hungry barbarous politicians began a looonggg time ago..

Ok so if Gore/Liberman ticket would have prevailed rather than Bush/Cheney it would have still happened? Or it wouldn’t have? I understand your view on the shadow government and what not, but if their reach is into both major parties and they were planning it in the Clinton years(and maybe before) wouldn’t it have happened under Gore/Liberman too? Or was it dependent on the whole Nazi grandson taking office thing?
 
Aug 8, 2003
5,360
22
0
43
#7
Deadpool said:
Ok so if Gore/Liberman ticket would have prevailed rather than Bush/Cheney it would have still happened? Or it wouldn’t have? I understand your view on the shadow government and what not, but if their reach is into both major parties and they were planning it in the Clinton years(and maybe before) wouldn’t it have happened under Gore/Liberman too? Or was it dependent on the whole Nazi grandson taking office thing?
Hm.. that would mean i have to speculate... but if on the off chance that bush was assasinated before coming into his presidency, then yes, i wouldnt doubt it would have still happend, wether on the exact date or not...
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,283
113
#9
Originally Posted by Pres. John F. Kennedy; in a speech at Columbia University, 1963;tens days before he was assassinated.
"The high office of the president has been used to foment a plot to destroy America's freedom, and before I leave office, I must inform the citizens of their plight." ―
And people wonder WHY the conspiracy of JFK is so affluent....he wanted to RIGHT the WRONG....and they made him pay....they even killed his son...the government society FEARS the Kennedys....its almost laughable....