This is Fucked up....Dumb British

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Oct 14, 2004
2,782
0
0
46
#21
AGENT707 said:
white people crack me up.... i think they are great I SWEAR!!!

man, i bet anybody who IS a racist like me is suspicious to u....


I read more about this and they guy ran cuz he had an expired visa and he worked In London and mostly sent money back home to support his family...(he was Brazilian)

AND....dude was shot SEVEN times in the head.....

Yeah and I bet anyone that isnt Black your a racist to. You know nothing about me so stay to posting in this forum and that scardy cat shit only applies to you. I guess all black people eat fried chicken. Racist black people piss me off, well any racist person. Point is guy shouldnt have ran away or has that thought not stuck in your head yet. Maybe he should have got his Visa renewed. Its this guys fault because hes an idiot.
 
Jan 2, 2003
1,439
6
0
#23
Rob S4 said:
Yeah and I bet anyone that isnt Black your a racist to. You know nothing about me so stay to posting in this forum and that scardy cat shit only applies to you. I guess all black people eat fried chicken. Racist black people piss me off, well any racist person. Point is guy shouldnt have ran away or has that thought not stuck in your head yet. Maybe he should have got his Visa renewed. Its this guys fault because hes an idiot.
******white people crack me up....scardy-cat mudaphuckers i SWEAR!!!

man, i bet anybody who ISNT white is suspicious to u....


I read more about this and they guy ran cuz he had an expired visa and he worked In London and mostly sent money back home to support his family...(he was Brazilian)

AND....dude was shot SEVEN times in the head.....*****

thats what i posted....y did u chnage what i said?????????????????????


"racist black people piss me off"

??????....i aint black....

WTF is goin on here??
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
45
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#24
Shit, this man was followed for a half hour by the police, who again were plain clothed. Eyewitnesses to the shooting have stated that the men did not identify themselves as police when they rushed him. They said they wrestled him to the ground and pinned him down by at least two men, while another placed a gun to his head and shot him 7 or 8 times.

They stated that his padded jacket was “inappropriate” for this time of year and apparently that's all that it takes for them to determine to "destroy his brain instantly."

“There is only one sure way to stop a suicide bomber determined to fulfill his mission: destroy his brain instantly, utterly.” - Lord Stevens, Metropolitan Police Commissioner link to quote.

More people will likely die:

“Somebody else could be shot..but everything is done to make it right.” - Sir Ian Blair
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
45
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#25
Tha_Perv said:
Are you guys that stupid? Running from the police in a subway just days after their bombings is not a smart thing to do.

At the point where he disobeyed orders from the police, he became guilty.

Tragic, but his fault.
Yes, he was asking for it. He should have realized that the war on terror had granted police a license to kill anyone with brown skin and dressed in a warm coat. :rolleyes:
 
Jun 19, 2004
1,158
9
0
42
#27
Tha_Perv said:
Given the recent tragedies there, why would you wear a coat, go to the subway, and run from the police? Hmm....gee does that make sense?

Man you are special, I've read it about 6 times now, THEY WERE NOT IN UNIFORM, THEY WERE DRESSED JUST LIKE EVERY ONE ELSE AND THEY DID NOT LET THE GUY KNOW WHO THEY WERE,.........
 
Jun 27, 2003
2,457
10
0
39
#28
Tha_Perv said:
Given the recent tragedies there, why would you wear a coat, go to the subway, and run from the police? Hmm....gee does that make sense?
doesn't the government tell its citizens to continue with life as normal?? Hmm.. geee does it make sense to you yet???

How do any of the above justify a group of pigs shooting a man 8 times????
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
45
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#30
So it turns out that this man did nothing wrong, nor did he do anything “suspicious.” His only crime was being non-white.

:::::::
:::::::



ITV News has obtained secret documents and photographs that detail why police shot Jean Charles De Menezes dead on the tube.

The Brazilian electrician was killed on 22 July, the day after the series of failed bombings on the tube and bus network.

The crucial mistake that ultimately led to his death was made at 9.30am when Jean Charles left his flat in Scotia Road, South London.

Surveillance officers wrongly believed he could have been Hussain Osman, one of the prime suspects, or another terrorist suspect.

By 10am that morning, elite firearms officers were provided with what they describe as "positive identification" and shot De Menezes eight times in the head and upper body.

The documents and photographs confirm that Jean Charles was not carrying any bags, and was wearing a denim jacket, not a bulky winter coat, as had previously been claimed.

He was behaving normally, and did not vault the barriers, even stopping to pick up a free newspaper.

He started running when we saw a tube at the platform. Police had agreed they would shoot a suspect if he ran.

A document describes CCTV footage, which shows Mr de Menezes entered Stockwell station at a "normal walking pace" and descended slowly on an escalator.

The document said: "At some point near the bottom he is seen to run across the concourse and enter the carriage before sitting in an available seat.

"Almost simultaneously armed officers were provided with positive identification."

A member of the surveillance team is quoted in the report. He said: "I heard shouting which included the word `police' and turned to face the male in the denim jacket.

"He immediately stood up and advanced towards me and the CO19 officers. I grabbed the male in the denim jacket by wrapping both my arms around his torso, pinning his arms to his side.

"I then pushed him back on to the seat where he had been previously sitting. I then heard a gun shot very close to my left ear and was dragged away onto the floor of the carriage."

The report also said a post mortem examination showed Mr de Menezes was shot seven times in the head and once in the shoulder, but three other bullets missed, with the casings left lying in the tube carriage.

Police have declined to comment while the mistaken killing is still being investigated.

http://www.itv.com/news/index_1677571.html
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
45
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#32
Police guilty over Menezes case



London's police force has been found guilty of breaking health and safety laws over the shooting dead of a man officers mistook for a suicide bomber.


The Metropolitan Police unnecessarily put the public at risk in chasing Brazilian Jean Charles de Menezes across the city, a jury decided.

Armed police shot Mr de Menezes shot seven times in the head at Stockwell Tube station on 22 July 2005.

The force has been fined £175,000 and ordered to pay £385,000 in costs.

The Old Bailey jury said police chief Cressida Dick, who led the operation, bore "no personal culpability".

In a statement, Len Duvall, chair of the Metropolitan Police Authority (MPA), said policing in London was "a tough business".

"We ask the police to do a difficult job on our behalf and sometimes they make mistakes," Mr Duvall said.

"This case led to the tragic death of an innocent man. Our ultimate aim is to make sure we all learn from this tragedy."

The MPA said it fully supported Met Police Commissioner Sir Ian Blair and would continue to work with him.

But the Liberal Democrats have called for Sir Ian to resign.

The party's president Simon Hughes said: "I think it has very severe implications for the Met Police.

"This was a collective failure of responsibility, a collective breach of the law, and both the police service, led by the commissioner, and the police authority, who are the politically accountable people, will have some very severe questions to answer, and rightfully so."

'Risk to public'

The unprecedented, highly controversial trial came after prosecutors said that no individual officer could be held responsible for the electrician's death.

Instead, they said the force, represented by the Met Commissioner's Office, should be tried for failing to protect the public from the risks posed by a suspected suicide bomber on the loose.

The Met vehemently denied the allegation during the trial, saying that there was no case for it to answer.

But Clare Montgomery QC, prosecuting, told the jury that Scotland Yard commanders had made a string of errors on 22 July that culminated in an unwarranted risk to the public and ultimately the death of Mr de Menezes.

Sir Ian had warned before the trial began that a guilty verdict would have profound effects on policing.

He said officers would be left in a difficult position of not being able to use their judgement in emergency situations, out of fear of breaking the law.

But during his summing up, Mr Justice Henriques told the jury they needed to focus on the key events of the day.

"It was not appropriate to say this case may have an influence on the way police throughout the country may carry out their work in the future," he told the jury.

"Your concern is the past and what happened on July 22, nothing more, nothing less."

Failures

The operation began when detectives investigating the failed suicide bombings of the previous day linked one of the suspects, Hussain Osman, to a block of flats in south London.

Mr de Menezes also lived in the block, and when he left home at 0930 BST, surveillance officers were unsure if he was their target.

Ms Montgomery told the court the situation had worsened because senior officers failed to keep to their own agreed plan, while firearms teams were both poorly briefed and in the wrong locations.

This meant that it became impossible to effectively stop the suspected suicide bomber before he boarded a bus and headed for the underground system.

The Met denied this, saying its commanders and officers on the ground did all they could to apprehend the bombers and minimise the risks to the public.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7069796.stm