They 'Bout to Legalize Marijuana in California....

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
montroller510

montroller510

Sicc OG
#61
Apr 23, 2006
5,687
128
63
123
#61
Pak Dan said:
L0L WHAA..


ARNOLD IS AGAINST THIS BUT THE FED. GOV'T GOT A SAY....
Click to expand...
the feds dont have a say in what laws we pass

that wshh video was a joke

first they said tom ammiano STATE legislator and the bill would only affect the bay area??? that doesnt even make sense

and when it comes to state law we can do whatever we want.... BUT if the federal government decided they could come and raid us whenever and punish us federally

but i really doubt if they will waste there time and money finding raiding and locking up people who are following state law

and everyone is going to use the same argument that they raided medical users and clubs... BUT now we got a new drug czar and he is a hippie pothead sooo legalisation FTW
 
NiNe2FiVe

NiNe2FiVe

Sicc OG
#64
Apr 26, 2003
10,869
16,113
0
61
East Oakland, USA
#64
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


AB 390, as introduced, Ammiano. Marijuana Control, Regulation, and
Education Act.
Existing state law provides that every person who possesses,
sells, transports, or cultivates marijuana, concentrated cannabis, or
derivatives of marijuana, except as authorized by law, is guilty of
one or more crimes.
This bill would remove marijuana and its derivatives from existing
statutes defining and regulating controlled substances. It would
instead legalize the possession, sale, cultivation, and other conduct
relating to marijuana and its derivatives by persons 21 years of age
and older, except as specified. It would set up a wholesale and
retail marijuana sales regulation program, including special fees to
fund drug abuse prevention programs, as specified, to commence after
regulations concerning the program have been issued, and federal law
permits possession and sale consistent with the program. It would ban
local and state assistance in enforcing inconsistent federal and
other laws relating to marijuana, and would provide specified
infraction penalties for violations of these new marijuana laws and
regulations, as specified. It would make other conforming changes.
By creating various infractions for violations of regulations and
laws created by this act, this bill would impose a state-mandated
local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local
agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the
state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that
reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this
act for a specified reason.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: yes.

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/asm/ab_0351-0400/ab_390_bill_20090223_introduced.html
 
GTS

GTS

....
#65
Feb 8, 2006
3,435
6,143
113
#65
It can be legal in the bay area and illegal in Yolo county or any other county, just like alcohol is legal but there are dry cities some places.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom