Peterson: Garcia returning to Raiders not such an outlandish idea
By Gary Peterson
Oakland Tribune columnist
Posted: 10/01/2009 06:01:41 PM PDT
Updated: 10/02/2009 08:46:35 AM PDT
Having been waived by the Philadelphia Eagles, Jeff Garcia needs a team. Having watched JaMarcus Russell struggle mightily in the season's first three games, the Raiders could use an experienced alternative at quarterback.
The question wasn't who would connect these Gerard Warren-sized dots, but who would be first. All hail ESPN.com's Bill Williamson, who blogged Tuesday that the Raiders "could decide to call" Garcia, and that Garcia might be interested "if it meant he'd be the starter."
As exhibit A, that wouldn't be admissible in a court of law. (Though it should be noted that on Wednesday, Raiders coach Tom Cable lukewarmly denied the team was pursuing Garcia, which isn't exactly on the order of "That clown? No way.") But as straight-up speculation the notion is beyond intriguing. In fact when you think it through, it's tough to find a downside.
But first, this 30-second reset:
The Raiders signed Garcia as a free agent last offseason. Though their intent was to provide a solid backup, perhaps an on-site mentor, maybe even a motivational fire for Russell as he embarked on his third NFL season, Garcia clearly had other designs. He wished openly for a chance to compete for the starting job. When he saw that wasn't going to happen, he asked for his release.
You'd have to believe he's a bit humbled at this point. Signed by the Eagles as insurance after Donovan McNabb suffered a broken rib in the season opener, Garcia was cut after just two games and three kneel-downs.
He might regard a chance to play for the Raiders differently now. And, we might add, vice versa. Russell has been nothing short of brutal. His passer rating of 39.8 is last in the NFL (14.5 points behind the next ranked quarterback, Carolina's Jake Delhomme, who has thrown seven interceptions).
The downside of re-signing Garcia and starting him ahead of Russell? Well, no one likes to be benched. And there's the possibility it might affect Russell's confidence. But you could say the same about allowing him to continue to play when the game is clearly moving too fast for him.
It's an ugly scene. Russell is being booed hard by Raiders fans looking for any opportunity to vent their frustration over the past six years. It may not be fair, and it's definitely not all his fault. But he's making a splendid target.
He's missing open receivers, which is never a good thing. Some of his off-target throws might be attributable to poorly run routes. Others are flat-out misfires. Does he feel rushed? Is he simply off the mark? It's tough to tell, though what we do know is anytime he puts air under the ball on a long throw, it's time to shudder.
And while we wouldn't pretend to know what his current or optimum playing weight is, it's obviously time to retire any thoughts about Russell being a semi-mobile quarterback. He won't outrun anyone, and he doesn't even maneuver around the pocket a la Ben Roethlisberger, another plus-sized QB. That's not a felony, but until Russell can make quicker decisions, it's a liability.
The downside of throwing Garcia into the lineup? Well, he is 39. There doesn't seem to be a bull market for his services, so that tells you what player personnel experts around the league think of his skills at this point.
But for what the Raiders need, he could be a fit. He knows how to make plays with his feet. That would be a boon for an offense with young receivers, young backs and a line that has its moments. Maybe he helps prime the team's offensive pump. Any offense he generates would give us a better feel for how good the Raiders can be — mostly because it would have a domino effect on the defense, which has been taxed by the offense's inability to stay on the field.
And by "taxed" we mean: Since they opened the season with three strong drives against the San Diego Chargers, the Raiders have gone three-and-out (or worse) on 16 of 28 possessions. During that time, opponents have run 209 offensive plays to Oakland's 136.
In that sense this is bigger than Russell's development as a quarterback. It's about the Raiders' development as a fully functional team.
And as of the moment, it's an exercise in thinking out loud. Hey, it gives us all something to do between Shane Lechler punts.
Contact Gary Peterson at
[email protected].