The Broncos offseason gets better and better..RAIDERS SIGN BROOKS!!

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
403
83
#3
herm96 said:
got to add that kc lost tony richardson to vikings.
with all these moves it makes the afc west champ a winner by default...lol

because I will admit before yesterdays trade Denver hasn't did shit either. But at least our trade was for the better.
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
403
83
#5
herm96 said:
i agree but denver still needs a one more rb and secondary help.

with 1 of our 2 1st rounders they take Maroney or White...and a db with the other pick.


thats if they dont trade them both to move up for Mario W.
 
Apr 25, 2002
1,617
30
48
#7
why do we need another back? they are gonna run Tatum just like we did Portis.........he will do a great job, an if not Ron Dayne is dyin to start


with that #15 pick, I say we are gettin a defensive end..............
 
Jan 4, 2003
4,549
5
0
#12
Aaron Brooks Career Summary

* Has completed 1,563 of 2,771 pass attempts for 19,156 yards, 120 touchdowns and 84 interceptions since entering the NFL with the Green Bay Packers in 1999.

* Threw for a career-best 3,832 yards in 2001.

* In 2002, tossed a career-high 27 touchdown passes. In 2003, he notched a three-to-one touchdown-to-interception ratio with 24 TD passes against just eight interceptions.

* Has also proven to be a very mobile quarterback during his career logging 1,410 yards on 340 carries, with 13 rushing touchdowns.

* Ranked first in club history with 28 regular season games with 250 or more yards passing.

* In 2003, Brooks set the Saints' single season passing mark with 3,832 yards. In 2004, he set the club record for most completions in a single game with 34. Brooks completed 240 of 431 pass attempts for 2,882 yards and 13 TDs in 13 games during the 2005 campaign with New Orleans.

* Accounted for four of the top seven single season passing performances in Saints history. In 2000, he set the club record for passing yards in a single game with 441 against the Denver Broncos.

* Was the only quarterback in Saints history to throw for 3,500 yards in four straight seasons, and to throw for more than 20 touchdowns in four straight years.
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#13
RAS 925 said:
Jake Plummer is WAY better than Aaron Rodgers.

As for those stats.... Kerry Collins also had good stats before going to Oakland. LaMont Jordan was supposed to be a great back, but in Oakland he's mediocre. Warren Sapp was once a great DL, but not in Oakland. The Raiders are known for signing talent and ruining their careers. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying Aaron brooks has great talent, but if he did they would probably fuck him up as well.

Horrible move on the Raiders' part. The reason? Because they had a chance at one of the 3 top QBs in the draft and now they will probably pass on that opportunity because of Brooks' acquisition.

To quote E-40's song:
DUMB DUMB DUMB DUMB DUMB DUMB DUMB DUMB
 
Jun 1, 2002
7,358
14
0
46
#14
FATAL NYGHTMARE said:
Jake Plummer is WAY better than Aaron Rodgers.

LaMont Jordan was supposed to be a great back, but in Oakland he's mediocre.


MEDIOCRE? HE RUSHED FOR OVER A 1,000 YARDS LAST YEAR AND WAS 17TH IN THE ENTIRE LEAGUE FOR RECIEVING YARDS. NOW THAT AINT ELITE, BUT IT SURE IN THE FUCK AINT MEDIOCRE.
 

VIC

Sicc OG
Oct 29, 2002
333
0
0
#15
There Aint A Solitary 1 Who Doesnt Love The Broncos said:
MEDIOCRE? HE RUSHED FOR OVER A 1,000 YARDS LAST YEAR AND WAS 17TH IN THE ENTIRE LEAGUE FOR RECIEVING YARDS. NOW THAT AINT ELITE, BUT IT SURE IN THE FUCK AINT MEDIOCRE.


WHEN YOU GO 4-12 AND THE LOWz OF THE SEASON TO ROCK BOTTEM, OVER 1,000 YARDz IS GOOD, THE OAKLAND MEDIOCREz.
 
Jan 4, 2003
4,549
5
0
#16
Solitary 1 said:
MEDIOCRE? HE RUSHED FOR OVER A 1,000 YARDS LAST YEAR AND WAS 17TH IN THE ENTIRE LEAGUE FOR RECIEVING YARDS. NOW THAT AINT ELITE, BUT IT SURE IN THE FUCK AINT MEDIOCRE.
and also remember he was rushing behind a not so good oline.. Look for Jordan to have an even better season this time around with his 2nd time as a starter
 
Jan 4, 2003
4,549
5
0
#17
FATAL NYGHTMARE said:
Jake Plummer is WAY better than Aaron Rodgers.

As for those stats.... Kerry Collins also had good stats before going to Oakland. LaMont Jordan was supposed to be a great back, but in Oakland he's mediocre. Warren Sapp was once a great DL, but not in Oakland. The Raiders are known for signing talent and ruining their careers. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying Aaron brooks has great talent, but if he did they would probably fuck him up as well.

Horrible move on the Raiders' part. The reason? Because they had a chance at one of the 3 top QBs in the draft and now they will probably pass on that opportunity because of Brooks' acquisition.

To quote E-40's song:
DUMB DUMB DUMB DUMB DUMB DUMB DUMB DUMB
We wouldn't have a shot at Leinert for sure... Maybe we'd have a shot @ Vince Young but then again I'd rather have Brooks here with our future ( Andrew Walter ) as back up and draft D in the 1st round
 
Sep 12, 2002
3,030
5
38
#19
T-Dubb said:
why do we need another back? they are gonna run Tatum just like we did Portis.........he will do a great job, an if not Ron Dayne is dyin to start


with that #15 pick, I say we are gettin a defensive end..............
tatum cant run 20 times(injury prone) a game , more like 10-15 carries, ron dayne probably will start but in case ron dayne cant take the load, pick a back 2nd or 3rd round.