Suppose you killed somebody...

[Stealth]

nah, wikepedias smarter than you. youre still in school, wikepedia is not. and my 'interpretation' wasnt interpreted.

its not an argument because ill dismiss anything you say as rubbish. and FYI, i vaguely remembered you were in law school, i was giving you a chance to toot your horn for us one more time, because it couldnt have been anyone BUT you.

so basically, lets leave it at that and ill go on with my day puffing kush. hit me up when you actually pass the bar.

edit: and lol @ 'rub my intelligence in your face'...nothing you can say will make me think youre intelligent. and dont take that offensively...wait, youre brain man...and you knew that.

Dude...you're seriously a faggot. Have a good life.

You wanna argue about how you were wrong about being an accessory to murder and we can talk all day.

You wanna try to make me look like an asshole for tooting my horn just because I wanted to correct false information and verify the question you posed about my education level, go ahead. Its just the internet and I'm sorry for pointing out your inability to understand wikipedia.

And for the record, I'm not rubbing my intelligence in your face. Let me repeat that NOT rubbing my intelligence in your face. I'm sorry if by me saying i am NOT rubbing my intelligence in your face that you got threatened. I think its funny that I'm the kind of person who doesn't think that a level of education makes any one person better than another person. I dont think I'm better than anyone, in any way shape or form. But when you put yourself out there trying to be a smartass and say something like "unless you're in law school or a judge" well then fucking right I'm gonna tell you that I'm in law school. Hell, you even promised if I was in law school you'd listen to me. But once you realized your smartass comment backfired...fuck you only have 56 posts anyways...you're probably some dumbass that's got banned on this board about 1000 times already...



But thanks for ruining a perfectly good thread when I was just trying to add to it for conversation. I'm sorry if my level of education makes me no longer fit to carry on a discussion in the last remaining sanctuary for gangsta rap.

Now that we have finished comparing penis sizes and have discovered that mine is bigger, lets get back to the actual argument that you plan on dismissing as rubbish without reading. Wikipedia said:

In some jurisdictions, an accessory is distinguished from an accomplice, who normally is present at the crime and participates in some way. An accessory must generally have knowledge that a crime is being, or will be committed. A person with such knowledge may become an accessory by helping or encouraging the criminal in some way, or simply by failing to report the crime to proper authority. The assistance to the criminal may be of any type, including emotional or financial assistance as well as physical assistance or concealment.

And you took this to mean that if you provide information to an individual you are an accessory to murder, and if you do it before the crime is committed, you are an accessory before the fact.

Your flawed interpretation, ironically enough, can be understood by the part that you BOLDED when you typed it in the first place.

An accessory must generally have knowledge that a crime is being, or will be committed.

YOU BOLDED IT. Now think about it. YOU MUST have KNOWLEDGE that a crime is BEING or WILL BE committed.

Wikipedia was right. Your interpreation of that was wrong. Its pretty cut and dry. WE CAN TALK ABOUT KILLING PEOPLE ALL DAY LONG, PROVIDED THAT WE HAVE NO FIRM KNOWLEDGE THAT A CRIME IS BEING COMMITTED AND WE ARE HELPING OUT WITH THAT CRIME.

You are a fucking dumbass.