Sugar Bowl Predictions...
- Thread starter usctrojan415
- Start date
BIG 10
6. Ohio State
8. Michigan
10. Iowa
14. Purdue
15. Michigan State
18. Minnesota
33. Wisconsin
first off when ohio state is the #1 team in a conf. thats a fucking sad conf. SECOND MICHIGAN GOT BEAT BY OREGON A PAC 10 TEAM WHO IS 2-3 IN THE PAC 10 AND 5-4 OVERALL. NOW MICHIGAN BEAT MICHIGAN STATE SO MICHIGAN STATE IS SORRY ALSO.
SEC is good. but lsu will losse another game. georgia already lost there 2nd and there over rated as fuck. sorry ass offense
Big 12.
1. Oklahoma
11. Texas
16. Nebraska
22. Oklahoma State
26. Missouri
30. Kansas State
DOES THAT SHOW TEXAS AS THE #2 TEAM???? FUNNY UCLA A PAC 10 TEAM DID BETTER AGAINST OK THEN TEXAS DID.
Big East
5. Virginia Tech
7. Miami
21. Pittsburgh
VT GOT KILLED BY A NOBODY AND THEN MIAMI GOT KILLED BY VT. WHAT THE FUCK DOES THAT SAY ABOUT BOTH THEM. PITT HAS A GOOD RECIVER BUT NOT A GREAT TEAM.
Pac 10
2. USC
13. Washington State
37 Oregon State
WEAK CONF RIGHT? RIGHT. BUT USC DID DEMOLISH A SEC TEAM WHICH IS SUPPOSEDLY A GREAT CONF. THEY KILLED ABURN NOT EVEN ALLOWING A POINT AND ABURN I BELIVE IS 4-1 IN THE SEC. SO I ASK THE QUESTION. IF USC KILLED A TEAM THAT HAS ONLY LOST ONCE IN THIS GREAT CONF. HOW SHOULDNT USC BE THERE???
SO EVERYONE CAN MAKE UP EVERY EXCUSE POSSIBLE WHY USC SHOULDNT BE THERE. BUT THEY KILLED A 4-1 TEAM IN THE SEC ABURN AND THEY JUST BEAT THE #6 RANKED TEAM IN THE FUCKING NATION.
SO EVERYONE THAT ONLY BASSES IT ON CONF PLAY. SEC SHOULD NOT GOT UNLESS ITS OLD MISS WHO IS 5-0 IN THE SEC BUT WAIT THEY CANT GO THEY HAVE 2 NON CONF. LOSSES. SO NO TEAM FROM THE SEC SHOULD GO.
BIG 12. ONLY TEAM WITH A BETTER CONF. RANK THEN USC IS OK. ALL THE 1 LOSS TEAMS HAVE AT LEAST 2 LOSSES.
BIG 10
NO ONE IS UNDEFETED IN CONF PLAY ALL HAVE 1 LOSSE
BIG EAST
PITT 3-0
MIAMI 3-1
VT 3-1
GUESS PITT IS THE BEST IN THE CONF AND WILL BE PLAYING IN THE SUGAR BOWL THIS YEAR.
NOW I KNOW YOUR GOING TO SAY YOU WERE MAKING THE POINT THAT THE OTHER CONF WERE HARDER. THERE FOR A 1 LOSS TEAM IN THOSE CONF. SHOULD GO OVER USC. BUT EVERYONE SAID THE SEC IS THE BEST CONF. AND WE BEAT A TEAM THATS 4-1 A TEAM THAT HAS THE SAME RECORD AS LSU THE SUPPOSEDLY BEST TEAM IN THE SEC.
SO THROW ALL YA CONF BULL SHIT OUT THE WINDOW. BECAUSE USC BEAT ABURN 23-0 SHUT OUT AT ABURN. LSU PLAYED AT HOME AND ONE 31-7. THEY COULDNT EVEN SHUT OUT ABURN AT HOME. THEY DID WIN BY 1 MORE POINT THOUGH.
AND TEAMS THAT HAVE BEEN RANKED THROUGH OUT THE YEAR IN THE PAC 10.
UCLA
USC
WASHINGTON STATE
WASHINGTON
OREGON
OREGON STATE
ARAZONA STATE
THATS 7 OUT OF 10 TEAMS BEING RANKED IN THE TOP #25 THIS YEAR.
PLUS USC IS #2 IN THE POLLS FOR A REASON.
6. Ohio State
8. Michigan
10. Iowa
14. Purdue
15. Michigan State
18. Minnesota
33. Wisconsin
first off when ohio state is the #1 team in a conf. thats a fucking sad conf. SECOND MICHIGAN GOT BEAT BY OREGON A PAC 10 TEAM WHO IS 2-3 IN THE PAC 10 AND 5-4 OVERALL. NOW MICHIGAN BEAT MICHIGAN STATE SO MICHIGAN STATE IS SORRY ALSO.
SEC is good. but lsu will losse another game. georgia already lost there 2nd and there over rated as fuck. sorry ass offense
Big 12.
1. Oklahoma
11. Texas
16. Nebraska
22. Oklahoma State
26. Missouri
30. Kansas State
DOES THAT SHOW TEXAS AS THE #2 TEAM???? FUNNY UCLA A PAC 10 TEAM DID BETTER AGAINST OK THEN TEXAS DID.
Big East
5. Virginia Tech
7. Miami
21. Pittsburgh
VT GOT KILLED BY A NOBODY AND THEN MIAMI GOT KILLED BY VT. WHAT THE FUCK DOES THAT SAY ABOUT BOTH THEM. PITT HAS A GOOD RECIVER BUT NOT A GREAT TEAM.
Pac 10
2. USC
13. Washington State
37 Oregon State
WEAK CONF RIGHT? RIGHT. BUT USC DID DEMOLISH A SEC TEAM WHICH IS SUPPOSEDLY A GREAT CONF. THEY KILLED ABURN NOT EVEN ALLOWING A POINT AND ABURN I BELIVE IS 4-1 IN THE SEC. SO I ASK THE QUESTION. IF USC KILLED A TEAM THAT HAS ONLY LOST ONCE IN THIS GREAT CONF. HOW SHOULDNT USC BE THERE???
SO EVERYONE CAN MAKE UP EVERY EXCUSE POSSIBLE WHY USC SHOULDNT BE THERE. BUT THEY KILLED A 4-1 TEAM IN THE SEC ABURN AND THEY JUST BEAT THE #6 RANKED TEAM IN THE FUCKING NATION.
SO EVERYONE THAT ONLY BASSES IT ON CONF PLAY. SEC SHOULD NOT GOT UNLESS ITS OLD MISS WHO IS 5-0 IN THE SEC BUT WAIT THEY CANT GO THEY HAVE 2 NON CONF. LOSSES. SO NO TEAM FROM THE SEC SHOULD GO.
BIG 12. ONLY TEAM WITH A BETTER CONF. RANK THEN USC IS OK. ALL THE 1 LOSS TEAMS HAVE AT LEAST 2 LOSSES.
BIG 10
NO ONE IS UNDEFETED IN CONF PLAY ALL HAVE 1 LOSSE
BIG EAST
PITT 3-0
MIAMI 3-1
VT 3-1
GUESS PITT IS THE BEST IN THE CONF AND WILL BE PLAYING IN THE SUGAR BOWL THIS YEAR.
NOW I KNOW YOUR GOING TO SAY YOU WERE MAKING THE POINT THAT THE OTHER CONF WERE HARDER. THERE FOR A 1 LOSS TEAM IN THOSE CONF. SHOULD GO OVER USC. BUT EVERYONE SAID THE SEC IS THE BEST CONF. AND WE BEAT A TEAM THATS 4-1 A TEAM THAT HAS THE SAME RECORD AS LSU THE SUPPOSEDLY BEST TEAM IN THE SEC.
SO THROW ALL YA CONF BULL SHIT OUT THE WINDOW. BECAUSE USC BEAT ABURN 23-0 SHUT OUT AT ABURN. LSU PLAYED AT HOME AND ONE 31-7. THEY COULDNT EVEN SHUT OUT ABURN AT HOME. THEY DID WIN BY 1 MORE POINT THOUGH.
AND TEAMS THAT HAVE BEEN RANKED THROUGH OUT THE YEAR IN THE PAC 10.
UCLA
USC
WASHINGTON STATE
WASHINGTON
OREGON
OREGON STATE
ARAZONA STATE
THATS 7 OUT OF 10 TEAMS BEING RANKED IN THE TOP #25 THIS YEAR.
PLUS USC IS #2 IN THE POLLS FOR A REASON.
yeah those Pac 10 teams were ranked in the top 25 at some time, but where are they now at the end of the season when it counts????? no where, they suck, the voters have figured out they were no goo, hype is a mutha fucka....1 team does not make a conference, yall beat the 6th ranked team, when OU beat Texas, they were ranked 6th...big fuckin deal, where is Washington State now??? where will their sorry asses be at the end of the year????? didnt yall lose to Cal? lets see where Cal is ranked in the Pac 10 if you wanna pull out this bullshit Auburn 4-1 bullshit, where is Auburn ranked now??? fuckin 28th......just cuz you beat some team when they were ranked high doesnt mean shit, i mean fuck, Colorado was ranked 7th earlier this year, OU beat them, you dont see anyone walking around talking about OU beating Colorado who was once ranked 7th or braging about Texas who was onc ranked 6th...anyone can twist some stats around....fuck.... K-State beat Cal, Cal beat USC, K-State is ranked 5th in the Big 12....so does that mean USC would be ranked 6th or below in the Big 12? no, but with your rambling it sounds like it would be ...you can point out certain wins by certain teams in conferences all day long but that doesnt mean shit....how you like this one???? K-State beat Cal, Cal beat USC, Texas beat K-State and OU beat the fuck outta Texas....so does that mean OU beats the fuck outta USC by over 70 points.....you got to be realistic in your arguments....the shit you are talking isnt realistic at all...the rankings speak for themselves, teams earn them
VT got killed by a nobody, but who did yall get beat by??? a bigger nobody
thats just like me saying last year when yall lost to K-State that K-State beat the best team in your conference (Pac 10) but they finished 3rd or 4th in the Big 12...what does that say about the Pac 10???? or that Oklahoma beat the other first placed team in the Pac 10 Washington State last year???? But Colorado lost to USC and Colorado won the Big 12 North.....you see, all this who beat who arguments doesnt work
you are missing my point big time on the conference shit........everything else equal, 5 teams with 1 loss....you would give it to a team that has 2 ranked teams in their whole conference schedule or a team that has 4 or more ranked teams in their conference schedule.....thats all im tryin to point out here....the conference shit is just illustrating the fact.
VT got killed by a nobody, but who did yall get beat by??? a bigger nobody
thats just like me saying last year when yall lost to K-State that K-State beat the best team in your conference (Pac 10) but they finished 3rd or 4th in the Big 12...what does that say about the Pac 10???? or that Oklahoma beat the other first placed team in the Pac 10 Washington State last year???? But Colorado lost to USC and Colorado won the Big 12 North.....you see, all this who beat who arguments doesnt work
you are missing my point big time on the conference shit........everything else equal, 5 teams with 1 loss....you would give it to a team that has 2 ranked teams in their whole conference schedule or a team that has 4 or more ranked teams in their conference schedule.....thats all im tryin to point out here....the conference shit is just illustrating the fact.
I disagree, the pac 10 always comes with good teams, it is just the fact that they rarely play teams from some of the other conferences. but when they do play them, they definitly do not get ran every time, in fact they win a lot. the BCS fails to see this and when they have a team from the pac 10 and a team from the big ten, they will always pick the team from the big ten because of their bias, not because they are better
HAHAHA this is funny shit!!!!!!!! your theories are funny as hell about sc..........."we beat such an such, an they beat such an such, so thats makes us good" LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
pac 10 is booty any way you look at it, they have 1-2 good teams every year while the rest of the confrences are kickin out 5-6 good team yearly
pac 10 is booty any way you look at it, they have 1-2 good teams every year while the rest of the confrences are kickin out 5-6 good team yearly
my point is you will see a 2 loss team from the big 12 or big 10 ranked alot quicker then a pac 10 team. thats bias plain and fucking simple
usc got the 13th hardest rank scehdual this year. but i guess they must only play easy teams huh??????????
see the reason i had to go to that game by game thing is to show you how fucking ridiculous you sounded. usc got the #13 hardest ranked scehdual. now that will drop in the last 3 games.
but will most likly be higher then lsu, florida state and VT. so honestly, what does that say about the teams they played???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
you talk shit. fine. but usc is #2 not florida state not ohio state not lsu not miami and not VT
and there is a reason for that.
usc got the 13th hardest rank scehdual this year. but i guess they must only play easy teams huh??????????
see the reason i had to go to that game by game thing is to show you how fucking ridiculous you sounded. usc got the #13 hardest ranked scehdual. now that will drop in the last 3 games.
but will most likly be higher then lsu, florida state and VT. so honestly, what does that say about the teams they played???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
you talk shit. fine. but usc is #2 not florida state not ohio state not lsu not miami and not VT
and there is a reason for that.
i believe it's going to be oklahoma....beating whoever they match up against....even if it's USC....there is NO REASON to believe that oklahoma would get "ripped a new asshole" by USC...none.....texas was hyped....so they beat them by 42.....last week...another killing against what , #15?....it wasn't even a game....oklahoma isn't just beating teams and winning games...they are KILLLLLLLIIIING THEM
and the pac-10 is a weaker conference...just to throw that into the argument that somehow the pac-10 always gets screwed and that such
and somebody just mentioned that USC was number two..not miami, not VT, etc. etc etc. "and there is a reason for that"...yes, there is a reason....the reason is that miami JUST LOST to VT this past week.....and you LOST TO CAL-BERKELEY (the powerhouse) about 5 weeks ago....that is the reason...which those dates around and it's miami number 2....and USC sitting lower
Miami loses to VT
USC loses to CAL
but somehow in this pac-10 biased forum....losing to cal isn't as bad...hah
and the pac-10 is a weaker conference...just to throw that into the argument that somehow the pac-10 always gets screwed and that such
and somebody just mentioned that USC was number two..not miami, not VT, etc. etc etc. "and there is a reason for that"...yes, there is a reason....the reason is that miami JUST LOST to VT this past week.....and you LOST TO CAL-BERKELEY (the powerhouse) about 5 weeks ago....that is the reason...which those dates around and it's miami number 2....and USC sitting lower
Miami loses to VT
USC loses to CAL
but somehow in this pac-10 biased forum....losing to cal isn't as bad...hah
who said lossing to cal isnt bad???? its horrible.
but for miami to be blown away and embarrised by a team who its self got embarrised the week before by a nobody.
thats just as fucking sad. miami got dominated. usc lost in double ot. yea to a worse team. but at least they did get smashed.
usc can beat ok. well see what happens.
but for miami to be blown away and embarrised by a team who its self got embarrised the week before by a nobody.
thats just as fucking sad. miami got dominated. usc lost in double ot. yea to a worse team. but at least they did get smashed.
usc can beat ok. well see what happens.
damn did yall see the BCS??????? I change my mind on who yall gonna have to be worried about, I think yall gonna have to be worried about Miami.....USC has 7.02 and Miami has 10.25.....6.5 of those points are from the AP/Coaches poll, so it isnt far for Miami to have to move up to reduce those points, plus they have a few quality teams left to play that will earn quality points like Tennessee and maybe Pittsburgh depending on where they are at and Miami's schedule strength is going to be rising while yall's is lowering....LMAO, this has to be the funniest shit I have seen all day, I honestly feel sorry for yall now because I think you guys are gonna get screwed for the 2nd straight year and I do want to see yall in the Sugar Bowl, looks like you will have to settle for playing Florida State....
to move up, all that has to happen is either for Miami to have more impressive wins or LSU, Ohio State, Virginia Tech, Florida State....any time won of those teams losses, Miami will gain 1 or 1/2 point (only 1/2 point if Ohio State losses) every other team that if they loss Miami will gain a point....but at the same time, USC will be gaining a few points from the computer polls because some of the computers still have them ranked 6th, 5th, etc.....but those are only 1/7th fractions they are moving down/up...not that much
for anyone that doenst know exactly who the shit is calculated or know the shit that goes into it, peep the link below...please look at the shit below before coming back with a response, I think I am being pretty unbiasted with my thinking on this subject
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/abcsports/BCSRankings
to move up, all that has to happen is either for Miami to have more impressive wins or LSU, Ohio State, Virginia Tech, Florida State....any time won of those teams losses, Miami will gain 1 or 1/2 point (only 1/2 point if Ohio State losses) every other team that if they loss Miami will gain a point....but at the same time, USC will be gaining a few points from the computer polls because some of the computers still have them ranked 6th, 5th, etc.....but those are only 1/7th fractions they are moving down/up...not that much
for anyone that doenst know exactly who the shit is calculated or know the shit that goes into it, peep the link below...please look at the shit below before coming back with a response, I think I am being pretty unbiasted with my thinking on this subject
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/abcsports/BCSRankings
I think 16 teams would be hella straight....would be a 4 game playoff system....conferences could eliminate their conference title games to cut down on a game and elimate about 1 game from their regular season as well...since every year teams are playing more and more games.....the only thing that is gonna cause problems is, what about the other 44 teams that usually play in bowls??? i know its fuckin ridiculous in the first place that 60 teams go to bowl games but its about the money. I could give a fuck less about the other teams but certain people who have clout will.....if the playoff system ever gets installed, they will have to have a system for the other teams....maybe have them have a mini playoff as well and let the winner of that play their way into the other playoff.....fuck I dont know, they need to get some type of playoff though...that shit would be fun as fuck to watch...play in all neutral sites and shit