Actually, you are denying it. I proved that grammatically you type something, you pretty much disregarded my proof, maybe because you didn't understand it, but the point stands. You talked about your "safety levels." You never once mentioned seatbelts, and even in the context of what you said, you didn't imply that's what we were talking about. And although I know you're going to disagree you must remember one thing, before you try to argue or disagree with something that *YOU* *WROTE* learn the syntax of the language. That way you can keep up with me. Secondly I never assumed a damn thing. Must I etymologically prove that also?
No, it doesn't. I *KNOW* what you *WANTED* to say. But I also know what *ACTUALLY* said. Once again, one must use grammatical rules, if not what one originally says, turns into something totally different. Sorry.
Wrong. Remember that whole thing about the "defenitive article" and the usage of demonstratives? You only *IMPLIED* seatbelts in the firstpart of your little tirade. The rest, as I proved, was a grammatical error on *YOUR* part. I, once again, *KNOW* what you intended to say. But, unlike you, I also know what you *ACTUALLY* said. So once again, as in all previous posts, you are wrong. I AM *TELLING* you what were talking about because it's what you typed.
What the hell are you talking about? Or did you forget this?
Right THERE! Right there, you are in agreeance with me! We are talking about...drum roll por favor...the SEATBELT LAW! So you, not I, but *YOU* have just contradicted yourself. How can I *NOT* know what we are talking about when *YOU* agreed that I *KNEW* we were talking about the same fucking subject you are denying that I know? Jesus Christ, you're an idiot.
Once again. You are an idiot.
Prove it, chump. I understand your logic. Especially since what *YOU* stated is what I am using as the basis of *MY* arguement. The thing *YOU* don't understand is that *YOU* dug your own grave when you incorrectly said something. I am simply running off of what *YOU* said. Therefore I am using *YOUR* stated logic. Since I *DO* understand your logic, I guess that means you are wrong.
And you are too simple to see that I am right. But proceed.
Wow. Please kill yourself now. Matter of fact NEVER procreate...that mean's don't have babies, but being that you're a fag I guess no worries there.
Now, you just stated an improvised point. But here's the clincher. I ALWAYS KNEW THAT WAS YOUR POINT. I'm smarter than you, remember that, and even though your new and improved point, because it is ALOT different than what you originally posted, is what I already KNEW was your point it is very different than what you originally posted.
Here is another "faux-paradox." You are arguing with me about whether or not I have an argument. ARGUING whether or not I have an arguement. This in and of itself creates and arguement for me. Completely defeating *YOUR* stance.
Not true. I actually understand both sides of this quarrel better than you.
Now I am off to bed. Please come back tomorrow.
