@StillHustlin
- I agree that it goes both ways. But not on the scale of NAACP or La Raza. At least not with that as their publicly stated goal. Either way, I still find it racist by definition. Again, we can debate whether some racism is worthwhile or justified, but it doesn't change that you're excluding whites for the benefit of non-whites. Good intentions, I know. But still racist. Also, I had to look it up but Rhodes Scholars are not always white.
rac·ism
[rey-siz-uhm]
noun
1.
a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
2.
a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
3.
hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.
---
I guess based off of that you have a point. I still don't view it as such but I guess that means my belief is flawed then, if we go off each of the definitions, but most people view racism as definitions 1 and 3, we are mistaken if we leave out the second I suppose.
PEACE
Last edited:
Props:
Filthy_Rich and Filthy_Rich