Obama Administration Announces Massive Piracy Crackdown

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Sep 24, 2002
2,016
3
0
41
#1
Obama Administration Announces Massive Piracy Crackdown
Jun 23 - Obama Administration Announces Massive Piracy Crackdown


DailyTech - Obama Administration Announces Massive Piracy Crackdown
"It's smash and grab, no different than a guy walking down Fifth Avenue and smashing the window at Tiffany's and reaching in and grabbing what's in the window." -- U.S. VP Joe Biden

While they may never be able to truly defeat piracy and drive it from the lurking depths of the internet, copyright protection attack-dog organizations like the RIAA and MPAA have long dreamed of the day when they would no longer have to pay for their own copyright enforcement. Now that dream is on the verge of coming true, thanks to the Obama administration.

After countless lobbyist dollars from the music and film industry and a brief "public review", the administration rolled out its vision to fight piracy yesterday afternoon. U.S. Vice President Joe Biden -- whose blunt speech has sometime left him in trouble -- did not mince words.

He states, "This is theft, clear and simple. It's smash and grab, no different than a guy walking down Fifth Avenue and smashing the window at Tiffany's and reaching in and grabbing what's in the window."

The sound-byte comparing downloads to stealing jewels from New York City's finest jeweler quickly lit up the web. Bob Pisano, interim chief executive officer at the Motion Picture Association of America praised the VP, "It is especially critical that the United States has an effective framework for protecting creative content online and enforcing intellectual property rights in the digital environment."

According to the Obama administration, the RIAA, and MPAA, the world economy is pretty much doomed if we don't start prosecuting pirates at home and abroad. Without such a crackdown, businesses will go bankrupt the coalition argues. Biden states, "Piracy hurts, it hurts our economy."

Interestingly, the statements seem to fly in the face of a recent Government Accountability Office study released to U.S. Congress earlier this year, which concluded that there is virtually no evidence for the claimed million dollar losses by the entertainment industry. That study suggested that piracy could even benefit the economy.

Another noteworthy study from three years back notes that virtually every citizen violates intellectual property laws in some way on a daily basis.

The White House press release was full of buzz phrases, but short on details. It did however indicate that the U.S. government may increasingly monitor filesharing networks and BitTorrent sites and assist media groups in their prosecution/threat letter efforts. It speaks of improved "law enforcement efforts at the Federal, state and local level."

The biggest effort, though, will be devoted to cracking down on piracy websites in the U.S. and overseas. The administration was short on details of how exactly it would convince piracy-loving nations like China to change their ways, but it did say it would try to do so by "being as public as we possibly can" about infringement.

The press release states, "As we shine the spotlight on foreign governments that have rogue actors doing illicit business within their borders, it's the government's responsibility to respond."

Such efforts have shown mild success. After lots of threats against the Swedish government by the U.S., the European Union nation finally tried admins with the nation's largest torrent site The Pirate Bay last year and found them guilty. The trial was later exposed to be a perversion of the justice system, with the judge who gave the verdict have multiple ties to copyright protection organizations. The verdict -- $3M USD in damages and a year of hard prison time for the admins -- is currently being appealed.

The White House's vision is perhaps a prelude to the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, which will go before Congress later this year. The bill would make P2P or BitTorrent client development a criminal offense if the distributed software was used for infringement. It also implements an interesting provision called "imminent infringement", which allows the government to charge people who they think might be about to infringe with a civil offense (for example if you searched "torrent daft punk"). This is among the first official "thought crime" provisions to be proposed by the U.S. government. The bill also makes it a criminal offense to bypass DRM.

Ultimately, it should be interesting to see how American taxpayers react to President Obama's decision to spend their money on efforts to prosecute them and try to choke out piracy at home and abroad, particularly when the current evidence is inconclusive of its effects. One thing's for sure, though. Top politicians on both sides of the aisle are firmly behind the music and movie industry anti-piracy and money-collection efforts.




for the slow . obama is nothing more than a figure head, a face of the people in control. he aint the one who had this idea. he aint the one forcing it hes just there . blame ALL politicians
 
Apr 21, 2010
362
0
0
#2
LOL @ "Piracy hurts, it hurts our economy."

You mean, it hurts the pockets of already incredibly rich producers and studio owners?
Like as if they really funnel that extra money made back into the economy, we all know that they store their money in off shore banks. Hello Cayman Islands!
 
Dec 3, 2009
2,421
48
0
43
#4
LOL ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR matey!

Yeah this is funny, I mean , the new shit like Drake sucks so much
i wouldn't even download it yet buy it.

I buy and support real and good movies!
and Also video games.
 
Jul 6, 2008
2,157
2
0
44
#5
oh ohhhhhhh, we are all gon get arressted and w/o jobs, cuz we in jail.

then without our tax revenue cuz we in jail, how is obama gonna be able to support al,l of his changes.

you need change to make change, obama.

i do not support any p[oliycal parties, freedo to all.
 
Aug 19, 2004
391
77
0
#6
So is everyone here against the methods, or against prosecuting internet piracy itself?

From what little I've read the RIAA is made up of some fucked up business and individuals. I remember not long ago they were trying to get more money from the radio stations.

But, I think that everyone stealing movies and songs off the internet is bad in general. How many record stores shut down because it was no longer profitable due to Napster and the rest of the file sharing programs started?

I feel bad for all the people involved in making movies and music, just so all their hard earned work to be downloaded for free by some asshole who's too cheap to spend $$$ and too lazy to go out and buy something.
 
Sep 25, 2005
1,148
1,075
0
43
#9
Maybe if people's motives for creating art aren't financial anymore, we'll start seeing some real shit. This may not be good for the industry but it will be good for the evolution of human kind.
 
Aug 19, 2004
391
77
0
#10
Maybe if people's motives for creating art aren't financial anymore, we'll start seeing some real shit. This may not be good for the industry but it will be good for the evolution of human kind.
I'm sure that most artists would like to just create whatever, but if they can't make money off their talent, that means they have to get some other kind of career to put food on the table, pay their rent, etc. Most will just kill their aspirations all together.

If they're doing a 9-5, atleast 5 days a week, that doesn't give much time, if any to hone your talent and spend time on creating new work. What little free time you do have, won't be enough to realize you're potential.
 
Apr 21, 2010
362
0
0
#12
I'm sure that most artists would like to just create whatever, but if they can't make money off their talent, that means they have to get some other kind of career to put food on the table, pay their rent, etc. Most will just kill their aspirations all together.

If they're doing a 9-5, atleast 5 days a week, that doesn't give much time, if any to hone your talent and spend time on creating new work. What little free time you do have, won't be enough to realize you're potential.
That explains why most people are truly unhappy. They cannot express what they really want to do in life because of an already setup structure of society that has be created to keep people from focusing on what they truly love in life.
 
Aug 19, 2004
391
77
0
#13
That explains why most people are truly unhappy. They cannot express what they really want to do in life because of an already setup structure of society that has be created to keep people from focusing on what they truly love in life.
That might fit with your argument if the majority of people in the united states were employed as artists.

I have a hard time believing that many successful writers, musicians, film directors, etc, are unhappy with their chosen profession.
I also have a hard time believing these same people chose their professions SOLELY because of money and not because of a genuine passion for their craft.



Or are you saying that the majority of people are unhappy because they aren't what they want to be, because that's something else entirely. Alot of different things play into that. Not everyone can have what they want.


World Values Survey of happiest countrys

^Don't know if that counts for anything.
 
Jan 31, 2008
2,764
3,359
113
44
#15
That might fit with your argument if the majority of people in the united states were employed as artists.

I have a hard time believing that many successful writers, musicians, film directors, etc, are unhappy with their chosen profession.
I also have a hard time believing these same people chose their professions SOLELY because of money and not because of a genuine passion for their craft.



Or are you saying that the majority of people are unhappy because they aren't what they want to be, because that's something else entirely. Alot of different things play into that. Not everyone can have what they want.


World Values Survey of happiest countrys

^Don't know if that counts for anything.
lol i think you missed the point of smiles reply.
what he said had nothin to do with artists but instead with people, so the second half of your paragraph is a little more relative, but even so, what smile said is that people arent happy not because they arent what they want to be as much as because they CANT be what they want to be or do what they want to do.

also, in my opinion, that world survey can only go so far and in this context so far isnt even scratching the surface.
 
Nov 24, 2003
6,307
3,639
113
#16
LOL @ "Piracy hurts, it hurts our economy."

You mean, it hurts the pockets of already incredibly rich producers and studio owners?

So you believe laws should be applied on a relative scale with enforcement based on wealth?


Ironic.


Isn't that one of the very same flaws in our current system that you are so against?
 
Jan 31, 2008
2,764
3,359
113
44
#19
So you believe laws should be applied on a relative scale with enforcement based on wealth?


Ironic.


Isn't that one of the very same flaws in our current system that you are so against?
i never knew smile said anything about enforcement being based on wealth or anything meaning the same thing?

my critical reading skills must be dull...

i must be asserting too much of my own conditioning into the words...
 
Nov 24, 2003
6,307
3,639
113
#20
I don't know about critical reading, but the comprehension and deduction ability might need some polishing. :)

No where in my post did I state "Smile you explicitly said....."

I read his/her original statement and then asked a related question in an attempt to better understand his/her POV.

The original statement seemed to allude to some sort of belief that there is a difference between stealing from "incredibly rich producers" and other people.

However, previous posts have led me to believe that Smile is critical of our current justice system because of it's inequitable treatment.

It struck me as ironic that someone who would champion equitable enforcement on one side, might decry it on another.

Not knowing if that was the truth, I posed my original question to better understand his/her position.

Comprende?