OAK 6 BAL 28 Final

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Chree

Medicated
Dec 7, 2005
32,405
13,935
113
40
#21
lol how u figure?

Oaklands average points per game - 3
Oaklands average allowed points - 28

SFs average points per game - 23.5
SFs average allowed points per game -23.5

look @ the stats as well, like i said, how can u really say Oak will beat sf by the performances? Be logical......
 
Jan 4, 2003
4,549
5
0
#24
so you gona judge base on the past 2 games stats?? its sports homie..

one day your team can get blown out the next they can be the team to blow their opponent out........

we'll be 2-2 by the time we done with the niners

bank it.... aint shit to base it off rite now after we got smashed by 2 good teams..

we'll get the Ws against the browns and niners tho.. just watch
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#25
You either have a serious case of denial, or you don't pay any attention to the raider games. They're terrible. Don't try to pawn it off on the fact the Chargers and Ravens are 2-0. You clowns claimed you would handle the Chargers and the Ravens, look what happened. Now you're claiming you're gonna handle the Browns and Niners? Please.

Maybe, just maybe you'll be 1-3 after you play the Niners, but SF won't be the team you beat.
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#27
What you mean "this time around?" I never said they would win in preseason. I don't give a shit about what happened in preseason and neither should you. We all know preseason games are worthless. I don't understand why you guys are holding on to a preseason victory.
 
Jun 1, 2002
7,358
14
0
46
#30
FATAL NYGHTMARE said:
clowns claimed you would handle the Chargers and the Ravens, look what happened. Now you're claiming you're gonna handle the Browns and Niners? Please.

Maybe, just maybe you'll be 1-3 after you play the Niners, but SF won't be the team you beat.

I DON'T KNOW ABOUT ANYONE ELSE ON THIS FORUM, BUT I NEVER, NEVER CLAIMED THAT WE WOULD HANDLE EITHER OF THESE TEAMS.. I KNEW WE'D START OUT 0-2.. NOW THE BROWNS AND THE NINERS.. THOSE ARE TWO WINNABLE GAMES.. SAY WHAT YOU WANT..
 
May 14, 2006
1,262
4
0
49
#31
as of right now we aint contending for anything.ill keep it real
i hope we beat tha niners though cuz ill be there.but tha way we look
man.we look bad.our offensive line (what offensive line) cant
hold tha pass rush & if u cant do that thats bad.but im'a ride wit my team
regardless.& ill be at a few games this year.
 

Chree

Medicated
Dec 7, 2005
32,405
13,935
113
40
#32
CSIDERICHCITY said:
as of right now we aint contending for anything.ill keep it real
i hope we beat tha niners though cuz ill be there.but tha way we look
man.we look bad.our offensive line (what offensive line) cant
hold tha pass rush & if u cant do that thats bad.but im'a ride wit my team
regardless.& ill be at a few games this year.

Good shit homie, At least u keep it really real....
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#33
@ Solitary 1..

The Chargers game was a winnable game. The Ravens too.

Chargers were as one-dimensional as it gets in week 1 because of them not knowin how their QB would play. Later in the season when he gains confidence they'll probably lose that one-dimensional offense completely, but when you guys played them they weren't balanced at all and they were highly predictable. Raiders just couldn't handle it. You can blame it on their line, but that's not gonna change in the coming weeks, the line will still blow.

As for the Ravens.. they kept shooting themselves in the foot. Their offense was fuckin up left and right. McNair played one of the worst games of his entire career. The raiders couldn't take advantage. Don't expect that to change anytime soon.

I won't speak on the Browns because I don't pay much attention to their team.

But SF on the other hand.. That offense is developing very, very nicely. Frank Gore can shred your soft D up and Alex is starting to show how good he can be. Our D is inconsistant, but your offense is ass and you know it. All signs point toward SF, and if that weren't the case I wouldn't be in here talking shit. Face the facts folks, honestly.

If the raiders win, I will give them props. But if they don't I'ma clown to the 1,000,000th power because of all the shit these clowns have talked, especially after knowing their team is trash.
 
Jun 1, 2002
7,358
14
0
46
#36
FATAL NYGHTMARE said:
@ Solitary 1..

The Chargers game was a winnable game. The Ravens too.

CORRECTION: THEY WERE WINNABLE GAMES FOR A TEAM THAT'S OFFENSE IS IN SYNC. ALSO YOU AND I KNOW THAT IF OUR LINE WAS PLAYING ANYWHERE NEAR DECENT.. WE WOULD HAVE DONE A HELL OF A LOT BETTER. THE O LINE IS A HUGE PROBLEM..

SF IS A WINNABLE GAME. YES, RIGHT NOW THE 9ERS ARE PLAYING AT A HIGHER LEVEL THAN US.. BUT YOUR LAST 2 VICTORIES CAME AGAINST TEAMS THAT ARE NOT CONTENDERS. PLEASE DON'T TRY AND TELL ME THE RAVENS OR THE CHARGERS ARE NOT.
 
Jun 1, 2002
7,358
14
0
46
#39
KAH707KALI said:
so your sayin the cardinals and rams have no chance of makin the playoffs?
ONLY BECAUSE THAT DIVISION IS WEAK. THEY AINT ON THE LEVEL OF THE LAST TWO TEAMS WE PLAYED. THEY ARE NOT WELL-ROUNDED POWERHOUSE TEAMS.
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#40
Solitary 1 said:
CORRECTION: THEY WERE WINNABLE GAMES FOR A TEAM THAT'S OFFENSE IS IN SYNC. ALSO YOU AND I KNOW THAT IF OUR LINE WAS PLAYING ANYWHERE NEAR DECENT.. WE WOULD HAVE DONE A HELL OF A LOT BETTER. THE O LINE IS A HUGE PROBLEM..
So..?

In case you didn't know, the O-Line is part of your team. If it's not performing well, then your team is not performing well. Who's fault is it that the offense sucks? So basically what you're saying is those two were winnable games for teams that are decent, and that's something the raiders are not.

The Chargers and Ravens are good teams, but neither of them played good games against the raiders. The Chargers played decent, the Ravens played below par. But they both demolished oakland. If they played a decent team the way they played the raiders they would have lost.

And Arizona & STL would both stomp the raiders..