i wasnt sayin the pats were gonna play the colts in the superbowl, i was just showin the best records in the league in general. i didnt word it right. continue on with the topic
THe Pats played the best NFC team in Dallas and spanked their asses good...what makes you think a lesser team of that of the Packers will do any better?
Why do you say that? What is your logic? I mean, its not like they have won 3 Superbowls this decade and have argueably a BETTER team than ANY of those teams so far. And its not like they took out the SB champs from last year already.
Maybe, maybe not....Brady has more playoff experience than Peyton does, and if the Pats can stay ahead of the Colts, they will have home field advantage.
Not to mention, the Pats got over a major hurdle in their schedule by beating the Colts.
THe Pats played the best NFC team in Dallas and spanked their asses good...what makes you think a lesser team of that of the Packers will do any better?
No I don't think the Packers would get "spanked" by the Colts or Pats because they play pretty good defense. I think they'll be in the game but I don't think the Pack would get blown out if they were to make it to the SuperBowl to play the Colts or Pats. We'll see what happens though.
i agree with that, also the lack of a running game or lack of commitment to a running game by the pack Will catch up to them. also just as quickly as farve can win a game for them he can lose it too....