now its official...raiders are LOSERS!!!

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 22, 2003
578
0
0
43
www.dankmobb.com
#22
The whole point in a season is to win and to win a championship. If any bronco fan wants to talk about losers, lets talk about this. I'm not talking about, well the broncos are 13-5 in oakland when the wind is at 10 degrees nw, I'm talking about the superbowl championship. I know I posted this in another thread, but here it is, Raiders 3 superbowls in five tries, the Broncos 2 superbowls in six tries. Which franchise has lost the most and won the least superbowls? And thats your loser.

No Elway and Terrell=No championship
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
403
83
#23
P.K. Rippa said:
The whole point in a season is to win and to win a championship. If any bronco fan wants to talk about losers, lets talk about this. I'm not talking about, well the broncos are 13-5 in oakland when the wind is at 10 degrees nw, I'm talking about the superbowl championship. I know I posted this in another thread, but here it is, Raiders 3 superbowls in five tries, the Broncos 2 superbowls in six tries. Which franchise has lost the most and won the least superbowls? And thats your loser.

No Elway and Terrell=No championship

So you are saying in the past 20 years the Raiders are LOSERS and the Broncos are Champions?

Because in the past 20 years Broncos have won 2 Raiders 0...read that again 0!!!!!!!!!

Thanks for clearing that up.
 

VIC

Sicc OG
Oct 29, 2002
333
0
0
#24
THANKS FOR CLEARIN THAT UP P.K, ONE SUPERBOWL VISIT IN 20 YEARS. THE SUCK JUST PACKS ON HIGHER AND HIGHER IN GAYDERAID COUNTRY. WE HAVE WINNING SEASONS, IT BEATS TOTAL SUCK.
 
May 22, 2003
578
0
0
43
www.dankmobb.com
#26
thascary1 said:
So you are saying in the past 20 years the Raiders are LOSERS and the Broncos are Champions?

Because in the past 20 years Broncos have won 2 Raiders 0...read that again 0!!!!!!!!!

Thanks for clearing that up.
VIC said:
THANKS FOR CLEARIN THAT UP P.K, ONE SUPERBOWL VISIT IN 20 YEARS. THE SUCK JUST PACKS ON HIGHER AND HIGHER IN GAYDERAID COUNTRY. WE HAVE WINNING SEASONS, IT BEATS TOTAL SUCK.
No matter the way you look at it, the bronchos are still the losing franchise in the championship game.
 

EDJ

Sicc OG
May 3, 2002
11,608
234
63
www.myspace.com
#27
^RAIDERS EMBARASSED THEMSELVES IN THE LAST SUPERBOWL. YOU HAVE YOUR NERVE. THAT LOSS WAS WORSER THAN N-E BLOWOUT THE BRONCOS HAD IN N-E-SUPERBOWL.

SOME OF YOU RAIDER FANS MAKE ME LAUgH. YAW SEASON IS BASICALLY THRU, AND YAW CAN'T EVEN ADMIT THAT BUT gO TO ERA'S THAT ARE LONg gONE AND YOU PROBABLY WASN'T EVEN BORN YET. BUT IF IT'S N-E CONSOLATION, WHAT YOU gOT ON THE NEXT gAME? YOU SO PROUD OF YOUR RAIDERS AND WOULD DIE FOR THEM. BET $51 ON THE NEXT gAME.
 
May 22, 2003
578
0
0
43
www.dankmobb.com
#28
EDJ said:
^RAIDERS EMBARASSED THEMSELVES IN THE LAST SUPERBOWL. YOU HAVE YOUR NERVE. THAT LOSS WAS WORSER THAN N-E BLOWOUT THE BRONCOS HAD IN N-E-SUPERBOWL.

SOME OF YOU RAIDER FANS MAKE ME LAUgH. YAW SEASON IS BASICALLY THRU, AND YAW CAN'T EVEN ADMIT THAT BUT gO TO ERA'S THAT ARE LONg gONE AND YOU PROBABLY WASN'T EVEN BORN YET. BUT IF IT'S N-E CONSOLATION, WHAT YOU gOT ON THE NEXT gAME? YOU SO PROUD OF YOUR RAIDERS AND WOULD DIE FOR THEM. BET $51 ON THE NEXT gAME.
Nah, our season has been over since the second lose to the chiefs, and I was alive when the Raiders won a superbowl. So what they lost that bad, lose by 1 point or lose by 90 points, it's still a loss. Bad management has kept the Raiders from being a great franchise that they had a potential of being. I'll admit that our team is mediocre at best. We have the squad, just need a better qb and a coach with a sense of passion and leadership, we get those we have a great shot at a winning season next year. With Turner and Collins on the team, I don't see the Raiders winning anything anytime soon.
 
Sep 12, 2002
3,030
5
38
#29
WHAT DO U EXPECT WHEN RAIDERS UPGRADE THE OFFENSE WHEN DEFENSE IS THE PROBLEM, 8-8 WOULD BE GOOD SEASON FOR RAIDERS. RAIDERS FANS ARE EXPECTING TOO MUCH.
 

Arson

Long live the KING!!!!
May 7, 2002
15,795
10,860
113
#30
EDJ said:
^RAIDERS EMBARASSED THEMSELVES IN THE LAST SUPERBOWL. YOU HAVE YOUR NERVE. THAT LOSS WAS WORSER THAN N-E BLOWOUT THE BRONCOS HAD IN N-E-SUPERBOWL.

SOME OF YOU RAIDER FANS MAKE ME LAUgH. YAW SEASON IS BASICALLY THRU, AND YAW CAN'T EVEN ADMIT THAT BUT gO TO ERA'S THAT ARE LONg gONE AND YOU PROBABLY WASN'T EVEN BORN YET. BUT IF IT'S N-E CONSOLATION, WHAT YOU gOT ON THE NEXT gAME? YOU SO PROUD OF YOUR RAIDERS AND WOULD DIE FOR THEM. BET $51 ON THE NEXT gAME.
Did you forget the 55-10 ass fucking at the hands of the 49ers in 1989? i know your probley a crack baby with numerous documented and undocumented learning disablitys but 55-10=45 , and 49-28= 21 . 45>21 not only that but it DOUBLES it, worst loss in superbowl history.
 
May 22, 2003
578
0
0
43
www.dankmobb.com
#31
Mr Arson said:
Did you forget the 55-10 ass fucking at the hands of the 49ers in 1989? i know your probley a crack baby with numerous documented and undocumented learning disablitys but 55-10=45 , and 49-28= 21 . 45>21 not only that but it DOUBLES it, worst loss in superbowl history.
Ah yea, I forgot about that one. The broncos got their asses whooped in that game.. That was bad.
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
403
83
#32
P.K. Rippa said:
Nah, our season has been over since the second lose to the chiefs, and I was alive when the Raiders won a superbowl. So what they lost that bad, lose by 1 point or lose by 90 points, it's still a loss. Bad management has kept the Raiders from being a great franchise that they had a potential of being. I'll admit that our team is mediocre at best. We have the squad, just need a better qb and a coach with a sense of passion and leadership, we get those we have a great shot at a winning season next year. With Turner and Collins on the team, I don't see the Raiders winning anything anytime soon.
Finally making some sense.

I don't agree fully with what you're saying though. Turner is only doing what is told of him. Everyone knows Al runs that team from top to bottom. Get rid of Al and that team would be fine. Collins isn't has bad as he has showin this year. He has a strong arm and with Porter and Moss going downfield they should have a ton of 40 50 +yard td's but they don't throw it downfield. I think the orders are to try and spread the ball instead of run run play action deep!!!

I mean if Denver can do it with Anderson smith Lelie, Raiders should easily do it with Jordan Moss Porter. It comes doen to Al wanting the team doing whatever he wants. It is alot like Dallas was for a few years before the got Parcells. Jerry ran the team and they sucked. So he was smart hired a great coach and turned over reigns...and look they are a competitve team again. I just don't think Al is that smart to do that with a coach. I mean look what he did with Gruden. If you all would have kept Gruden you could be ruling the AFC West, but Al thought it was the TEAM HE ASSEMBLED not the coaching job, look what happend, Chucky torched him, and they haven't been the same since.
 
Sep 12, 2002
3,030
5
38
#33
COLLINS WOULDNT BE THROWING(LESS INT) SO MUCH IF THEY RAIDERS WERENT ALWAYS DOWN. IT ALL START WITH DEFENSE. BALL CONTROL IS WAY TO WIN. ANOTHER THING IS RAIDERS ARENT COMMITED TO RUN THE BALL, ALWAYS WHAT THE BIG PLAYS.
 

EDJ

Sicc OG
May 3, 2002
11,608
234
63
www.myspace.com
#34
ARSON,
IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY, THE SCORE WAS DIFFERENT THAN THAT CAUSE I REMEMBER WATCHIN' THE gAME, AND SAYIN, "WHOOO, ATLEAST THE BRONCOS AIN'T gOT THE WORST SUPERBOWL LOSS, THANKS RAIDERS". BUT I CAN BE WRONg. REgARDLESS, THAT AIN'T NO EXCUSE FOR YOU TO TRY TO CALL ME OUT AND CALL ME OUT MY NAME. FACE TO FACE YOU WOULDN'T DO THAT. YOU LUKY YOU HAVE THAT SIg WITH OLE' gIRL. I'LL POUND THAT.

P.K RIPPA,
MY HATS OFF TO YOU PLAYA.
 
Apr 25, 2002
1,617
30
48
#36
Arson is right........that was an still is the worst loss in superbowl history........55-10. it broke the old record that redskins set against us 2 years earlier.
 
Jun 5, 2004
21,357
22,474
0
38
#37
fairy collins needs to shape up next year, he aint horrible, but come on dude... wtf get some glasses. oh well though, raiders merch will be cheaper now. and to all yall fools talkin shit about our last super bowl, half the reason we lost is jon gruden's ass. and even that aint as bad as the "55-10 assfucking" LMMFAO!!!
 
Apr 7, 2005
13,696
161
63
53
www.myspace.com
#39
we need a QB and some DB's that can TACKLE.

Remember Raider DBs...it's TACKLE football, not TICKLE. Bucchannon was a bust, and so is this new crop of maricones. Collins is garbage...like his initals...KC..shake that mutha fucka!!

yeah...the Broncos did get taken to Winchell's by the Skins, who we happen to have smashed (thanks Marcus Allen) a couple of years prior.

bottom line is, I'd have to agree with Pk's asssessment.